Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

National Humanities Center

The NATIONAL HUMANITIES CENTER is the world's only independent institute dedicated exclusively to advanced study in all areas of the humanities.

$1.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$104k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$8.4MRecreation & Sports$60kArts & Culture$10k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 11 grants below total $676,011 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,770,494 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,094,483 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $596k
$57,500
Median grant
9
States reached
$97M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DUKE UNIVERSITY$103,500
CORNELL UNIVERSITY$80,000
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL$75,000
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY$60,500
ST MARY'S COLLEGE OF MARYLAND$59,511
UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO$57,500
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY$55,000
FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY$54,000
INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON$51,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ$40,000
YALE UNIVERSITY$40,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $117k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE: $65k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $120k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA: $59k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS: $61k → 16%STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY: $80k → 7%COLGATE UNIVERSITY: $80k → 11%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $80k → 16%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $70k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $113k → 10%PRAIRIE VIEW A & M UNIVERSITY: $80k → 14%HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $110k → 14%FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY: $59k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $68k → 14%OREGON STATE: $57k → 18%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $83k → 8%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $186k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $176k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $80k → 8%SPELMAN COLLEGE: $160k → 13%THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $73k → 15%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $60k → 14%MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY: $62k → 16%COLLEGE OF WILLIAM & MARY: $94k → 7%HAMPTON UNIVERSITY: $71k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO: $58k → 10%TULANE UNIVERSITY: $56k → 23%ST MARY'S COLLEGE OF MARYLAND: $60k → 8%BOWDOIN COLLEGE: $66k → 7%PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $105k → 16%HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $80k → 14%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $55k → 8%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $146k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $148k → 13%THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $60k → 14%XAVIER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA: $80k → 23%BOWDOIN COLLEGE: $65k → 7%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $122k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL: $142k → 13%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $114k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $127k → 13%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $112k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $91k → 13%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $104k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $75k → 13%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $57k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $60k → 13%NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY: $80k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $238k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions, $57k to organizations and $181k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Central America and the Caribbean$134k · 56% · 3 people

Stated purpose: FELLOWSHIP STIPENDS

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$104k · 44% · 1 grant · 2 people

Stated purpose: FELLOWSHIP STIPENDS

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.0M · 26 repeat orgs$3.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

26 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
62

Total granted

$5.0M
$2.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+16%

Still filing today

35%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $363k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $939k · revenue +51%
  • THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $190k · revenue +40%
  • BC
    Bowdoin College
    2× · 2019–2023 · $131k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • RU
    REGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2024 · $120k
  • PV
    PRAIRIE VIEW A&M UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $80k
  • XU
    XAVIER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA
    one grant, 2022 · $80k · revenue -2%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
3
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
4
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
7
Trustees of Clark University

Clark university's mission is to educate undergraduate and graduate students to be imaginative and contributing citizens of the world, and to advance the frontiers of knowledge and understanding through rigorous scholarship and creative…

Education
8
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
9
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
10
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
11
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
12
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trustees of Tufts College and the most unlike its peers is William Marsh Rice University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 75 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr16%7%20–35yr13%12%35–55yr16%76%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr16%4%20–35yr13%9%35–55yr16%84%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/99
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,466

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 99 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/49
Grantees still filing
36/49
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL — $1,003,918 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILLUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS — $282,435 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXASPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY — $222,000 · OtherNC STATE UNIVERSITY — $190,000 · Other+47 more — $2,970,199 · Other+47 moreDUKE UNIVERSITY — $938,600 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYSpelman College — $248,500 · EducationSpelman CollegeTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY — $190,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $131,500 · EducationBowdoin College — $130,500 · Education+42 more — $2,012,978 · Education+42 moreNorthwestern University — $111,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$4,668,552Education$3,652,078Recreation & Sports$111,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $938,600 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSpelman College — $248,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY — $190,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $131,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBowdoin College — $130,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University — $111,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND — $104,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $94,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $80,436 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetXAVIER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA — $80,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCornell University — $80,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLGATE UNIVERSITY — $80,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAMPTON UNIVERSITY — $70,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $70,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $61,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetVanderbilt University — $60,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $60,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOregon State University Foundation — $56,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $54,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $52,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS — $48,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY — $48,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMACALESTER COLLEGE — $47,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION — $47,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSWARTHMORE COLLEGE — $46,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBucknell University — $42,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARNARD COLLEGE — $42,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY — $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYale University — $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIndiana University Foundation — $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHEAST MISSOURI UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College — $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetClaremont Graduate University — $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $36,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKENYON COLLEGE — $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF GRINNELL COLLEGE — $31,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDavidson College — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern Methodist University — $28,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION — $27,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $24,292 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetClaremont McKenna College — $24,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWilliam Marsh Rice University — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNSON C SMITH UNIVERSITY — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Spelman College
  • Who funds THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac
  • Who funds Bowdoin College
  • Who funds Northwestern University
  • Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
  • Who funds University of Miami
  • Who funds XAVIER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA
  • Who funds Cornell University
  • Who funds COLGATE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds HAMPTON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
  • Who funds MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University
  • Who funds University of Chicago

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Collegiate Athletic AssociationIN23.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Collegiate Athletic Association · American Chemical Society · Tulsa Community Foundation · Howard Hughes Medical Institute · American Council of Learned Societies · Folds of Honor Foundation · Executive Leadership Council · Hispanic Scholarship Fund · Kpmg US Foundation Inc · President and Fellows of Harvard College · The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York · Us- Japan Council

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization National Humanities Center funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 8%
  • Delaware State University16% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College11% of income from government
  • Yale University9% of income from government
  • Brandeis University8% of income from government
  • University of Miami5% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College2% of income from government
  • Wesleyan University1% of income from government
  • Oregon State University Foundation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 99 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph