Skip to content
National Day Laborer Organizing Network at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

National Day Laborer Organizing Network

Improving the lives of day laborers in the united states.

$712k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Civil Rights$2.0MEmployment$1.2MHuman Services$705kCrime & Legal$198kCommunity Improvement$129kEducation$119kHealth$111kInternational$75kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 18 grants below total $345,367, the rows itemized in this filing. The $711,949 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $366,582 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $66k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $229k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$12,500
Median grant
9
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Chinese Affirmative Action$50,000
Arise Chicago$49,459
Operation Restoration$40,000
NEW LABOR$40,000
Immigrant Solidarity DuPage$23,195
South County Crosscultural Council$16,500
CARECEN$12,500
The Multicultural Intstitute (MI)$12,500
Community Action Board of Santa Cruz County$12,500
El Centro Cultural de Mexico$12,500
Asian American Futures$10,000
National Council for Occupational Safety$9,459
Tulane Law Clinic$9,459
Justice At Work$9,459
Arriba Las Vegas Worker Center$9,459
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $541k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Chelsea Collaborative Inc: $14k → 16%The Multicultural Intstitute (MI): $13k → 10%Community Resource Center: $52k → 9%Staten Island Community Job Center: $25k → 11%Houston's America for All: $30k → 16%EL Sol-Jupiter's Neighborhood Resource Center: $6k → 11%Community Resource Center: $13k → 9%El Centro del Inmigrante: $16k → 11%Houston's America for All: $24k → 16%Esperanza Community Center: $20k → 11%El Centro del Inmigrante: $15k → 11%Houston's America for All: $10k → 16%Esperanza Community Center: $12k → 11%TVN Red de Pueblos Trasnacionales: $27k → 17%Operation Restoration: $40k → 23%Staten Island Community Job Center: $15k → 11%TVN Red de Pueblos Trasnacionales: $8k → 17%Operation Restoration: $10k → 23%Neighbors Link: $6k → 9%CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER - CARECEN-: $99k → 14%CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER - CARECEN-: $70k → 14%CARECEN: $13k → 14%CARECEN: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
NV
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $293k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Central America and the Caribbean$293k · 100% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: Immigration corridor outreach and education · SUPPORT RADIO STATION

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.9M · 38 repeat orgs$916k to everyone else

38 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
40

Total granted

$3.9M
$825k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+41%

Still filing today

84%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $91k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCivil RightsEmploymentEducationCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AL
    Asian Law Caucus
    6× · 2017–2022 · $763k · revenue +180%
  • CALIFORNIA IMMIGRANT POLICY CENTER
    5× · 2017–2022 · $250k · revenue +58%
  • AL
    ARRIBA LAS VEGAS WORKER CENTER
    4× · 2021–2025 · $225k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • PH
    PUENTE HUMAN RIGHTS MOVEMENT
    one grant, 2018 · $165k · revenue -53%
  • LO
    LOS OLIVOS CIS
    one grant, 2020 · $75k · revenue -2%
  • AA
    ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +41%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fuerza LaboralPower of Workers

Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…

Education
2
Latino Union of Chicago

Latino Union works to defend the rights and dignity of contingent workers, including the right to immigrate, work, live free of oppression and violence, and provide for oneself and one's family.

Human Services
3
Centro Binacional Para El Desarrollo Indigena Oaxaqueno

Building Indigenous power through collective action to achieve economic, social and cultural development.

International
4
Colectiva Legal Del Pueblo

Colectiva Legal del Pueblo is a non-hierarchal collective organization founded for and by undocumented immigrants working to build community leadership and power for migrant justice through legal services, advocacy and education.

Civil Rights
5
Centro Comunitario De Trabajadores Incorporated

To advocate for immigrants rights in the workplace by providing workers with support in situations of workplace injustice.

Employment
6
Centro De Trabajadores Unidos

Educate workers on their rights,develope leadership in the immigrant community, organize and support al workers as they fight for their rights in the workplace and for changing policies policies that increase standards for all workers.

Human Services
7
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
8
La Raza Centro Legal - San Francisco

La Raza Centro Legal San Francisco provides high quality, highly trusted, free legal services to low-income or immigrant clients in the San Francisco Bay Area.

—
9
La Comunidad Inc

Legal, immigration and community organizing

—
10
Central Ohio Workers Center Inc

The Central Ohio Worker Center is a non-profit organization that educates, empowers, and advocates for and with low-wage and immigrant workers in Central Ohio.

Civil Rights
11
Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights

To advance the human & civil rights of immigrants & refugees in los angeles; promote harmonious multi-ethnic human relations.

Civil Rights
12
Centro Legal De La Raza

Centro Legal De La Raza is a comprehensive legal services agency protecting and advancing the rights of low-income immigrant communities throguh culturally competent bilingual legal representation, education, and advocacy.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centro De Los Derechos Del Migrante Inc; the most unlike its peers is Affordable Pasadena. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

76 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 76 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
26
Early backer (in before they grew)
73/76
Grantees still filing
48/76
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CALIFORNIA IMMIGRANT POLICY CENTER: $250,000 · Civil RightsCALIFORNIA IMMIGRANT…ARRIBA LAS VEGAS WORKER CENTER: $224,703 · Civil RightsARRIBA LAS VEGAS WOR…Chinese for Affirmative Action: $110,000 · Civil RightsChinese for Affirmat…WECOUNT: $103,000 · Civil RightsWECOUNTResistencia en Accion New Jersey: $51,150 · Civil RightsResistencia en Accio…COPAL-EDUCATION FUND COMMUNIDADES ORGANIZANDO EL PODER Y LA A: $35,000 · Civil RightsSOUTH COUNTY CROSS-CULTURAL COUNCIL: $29,000 · Civil Rights+5 more: $58,459 · Civil Rights+5 moreAsian Law Caucus: $763,000 · Crime & LegalAsian Law CaucusASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $50,000 · Crime & LegalASIAN AMERICANS ADV…+2 more: $15,800 · Crime & LegalLABORS TRAINING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE: $149,000 · OtherLABORS TRAINING AND COMMUNITY DE…DAY WORKER CENTER OF MOUNTAIN VIEW: $142,000 · OtherDAY WORKER CENTER OF MOUNTAIN VI…WORKPLACE PROJECT INC: $113,601 · OtherWORKPLACE PROJECT INCDON BOSCO WORKERS INC: $70,497 · OtherADELANTE ALABAMA WORKER CENTER: $50,150 · OtherIAJE: $80,000 · OtherIAJELOS OLIVOS CIS: $75,000 · OtherLOS OLIVOS CISStreet Level Health Project: $111,000 · OtherStreet Level Health ProjectUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER OF WESTCHESTER INC: $76,479 · OtherUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER OF WESTC…+25 more: $492,988 · Other+25 moreCentral American Resource Center - CARECEN - of California: $186,667 · Human ServicesCentral American …PUENTE HUMAN RIGHTS MOVEMENT: $165,000 · Human ServicesPUENTE HUMAN RIGH…HISPANIC RESOURCE CENTER OF LARCHMONT/MAMARONECK INC: $64,844 · Human ServicesHISPANIC RESOURCE…HOUSTON'S AMERICA FOR ALL: $63,786 · Human ServicesHOUSTON'S AMERICA…OPERATION RESTORATION: $50,000 · Human ServicesOPERATION RESTORA…LA COLMENA NYC INC DBA LA COLMENA F/K/A STATEN ISLAND COMMUNITY JOB CENTER: $40,000 · Human ServicesLA COLMENA NYC IN…TRANSNATIONAL VILLAGES NETWORK REDDE PUEBLOS TRASNACIONALES: $34,844 · Human ServicesESPERANZA COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $32,000 · Human ServicesCENTRO DEL INMIGRANTE INC: $31,090 · Human ServicesCENTREVILLE IMMIGRATION FORUM: $30,000 · Human Services+4 more: $37,814 · Human ServicesCommunity Action Board: $134,125 · EmploymentCommunity Ac…POMONA ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CENTER: $129,090 · EmploymentPOMONA ECONO…MONUMENT IMPACT: $114,000 · EmploymentMONUMENT IMP…ARISE CHICAGO: $79,459 · EmploymentARISE CHICAG…WORKERS' DIGNITY PROJECT: $35,665 · EmploymentWORKERS' DIG…+5 more: $47,387 · Employment+5 moreCentro Laboral de Graton: $155,650 · EducationTHE EDUCATION & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC: $40,000 · EducationTONATIERRA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE: $25,000 · EducationWORKERS DEFENSE PROJECT: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationSalva: $165,433 · Community ImprovementNorthern Manhattan Coalition For Immigrant Rights: $27,494 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $10,000 · Community ImprovementCHARITABLE VENTURES OF ORANGE COUNTY: $8,000 · Community Improvement+1 more: $5,000 · Community Improvement
Civil Rights$861,312Crime & Legal$828,800Other$1,360,715Human Services$736,045Employment$539,726Education$235,650Community Improvement$215,927

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAsian Law Caucus: $763,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetCALIFORNIA IMMIGRANT POLICY CENTER: $250,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetARRIBA LAS VEGAS WORKER CENTER: $224,703 over 4y, 18% of budgetCentral American Resource Center - CARECEN - of California: $186,667 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetSalva: $165,433 over 5y, 8.1% of budgetPUENTE HUMAN RIGHTS MOVEMENT: $165,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetCentro Laboral de Graton: $155,650 over 6y, 11% of budgetLABORS TRAINING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE: $149,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetDAY WORKER CENTER OF MOUNTAIN VIEW: $142,000 over 3y, 7.8% of budgetCommunity Action Board: $134,125 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetPOMONA ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CENTER: $129,090 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetMONUMENT IMPACT: $114,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetStreet Level Health Project: $111,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetChinese for Affirmative Action: $110,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWECOUNT: $103,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetIAJE: $80,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetARISE CHICAGO: $79,459 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER OF WESTCHESTER INC: $76,479 over 3y, 8.9% of budgetLOS OLIVOS CIS: $75,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetHISPANIC RESOURCE CENTER OF LARCHMONT/MAMARONECK INC: $64,844 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetHOUSTON'S AMERICA FOR ALL: $63,786 over 3y, 7.7% of budgetResistencia en Accion New Jersey: $51,150 over 3y, 11% of budgetOPERATION RESTORATION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBuilders of The Highway Foundation Inc: $45,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetLA COLMENA NYC INC DBA LA COLMENA F/K/A STATEN ISLAND COMMUNITY JOB CENTER: $40,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetTHE EDUCATION & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC: $40,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetWORKERS' DIGNITY PROJECT: $35,665 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetCOPAL-EDUCATION FUND COMMUNIDADES ORGANIZANDO EL PODER Y LA A: $35,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTRANSNATIONAL VILLAGES NETWORK REDDE PUEBLOS TRASNACIONALES: $34,844 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetIMMIGRANT SOLIDARITY DUPAGE: $33,195 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetESPERANZA COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $32,000 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetCENTRO DEL INMIGRANTE INC: $31,090 over 2y, 12% of budgetCENTREVILLE IMMIGRATION FORUM: $30,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetSOUTH COUNTY CROSS-CULTURAL COUNCIL: $29,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetNorthern Manhattan Coalition For Immigrant Rights: $27,494 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCOMITE DE APOYO A LOS TRABAJADORES AGRICOLAS INC: $25,500 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH: $25,459 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCENTRO DE LOS DERECHOS DEL MIGRANTE INC: $25,459 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTONATIERRA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE: $25,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetCENTRO CULTURAL DE MEXICO EN EL CONDADO DE ORANGE: $23,829 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetMISSION ACTION INC: $22,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWESPAC FOUNDATION INC: $22,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCENTRO HUMANITARIO PARA LOS TRABAJADORES: $20,223 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetMEDIA ARTS CENTER SAN DIEGO: $20,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetNEXTGEN EDUCATION FUND: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCouncil on Foundations Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLA COLABORATIVA INC: $13,750 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitabl…National Domestic Wor…Tides CenterThe California Endowm…NEO Philanthropy IncHispanics in Philanth…Solidago FoundationTides FoundationThe James Irvine Foun…Common Counsel Founda…The David and Lucile …Latino Community Foun…
Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC47.1× affinity29 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · National Domestic Workers Alliance Inc · Tides Center · The California Endowment · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Hispanics in Philanthropy · Solidago Foundation · Tides Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · Common Counsel Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Latino Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Day Laborer Organizing Network funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Day Laborer Organizing Network. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • La Colaborativa Inc: 34% of income from government
  • The Education & Training Institute Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Voz Workers Rights Education Project: 12% of income from government
  • Centro De Los Derechos Del Migrante Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Justice at Work Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
31report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 84 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on National Day Laborer Organizing Network’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home