Skip to content
National Charity League Inc - Monarch Chapter at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

National Charity League Inc - Monarch Chapter

To foster mother and daughter relationships through a philanthropic organization dedicated to community service, leadership development, and cultural experiences.

$33k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Human Services$19kHealth$14kCrime & Legal$6kFood & Nutrition$6kHousing & Shelter$4kReligion$3kYouth Development$2kCommunity Improvement$2k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $15,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $33,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $18,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$163k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES FAM$3,000
OCEAN INSTITUTE$3,000
BEYOND BLINDNESS$3,000
JF SHEA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER$3,000
HOMEFRONT AMERICA INC$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LAURAS HOUSE: $2k → 10%ILLUMINATION FOUNDATION: $4k → 10%Homefront America: $3k → 10%HOMEFRONT AMERICA INC: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

31%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$17k · 3 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
14

Total granted

$17k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+39%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’23’24
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionPhilanthropyCivil RightsRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HA
    HOMEFRONT AMERICA INC
    2× · 2019–2024 · $6k · revenue +88%
  • FAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES
    2× · 2019–2024 · $6k · revenue +24%
  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
    2× · 2020–2024 · $5k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • IH
    Illumination Health Home formerly The Illumination Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $4k · revenue +12%
  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $4k · revenue +6%
  • CA
    COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE OF ORANGE COUNTYgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $4k · revenue +39%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Laurel House Inc dba Hope Harbor

The mission of Laurel House (dba Hope Harbor) is providing a home for teens in crisis, transforming lives, and strengthening families. Laurel House has the only long-term youth shelters in Orange County, CA for runaway, homeless and…

—
2
Assistance League of Laguna Beach

Assistance League of Laguna Beach volunteers are focused on transforming lives and strengthening our community.

Human Services
3
Colette's Children's Home Inc

Colettes childrens home provides housing and supportive services to homeless women and children with nowhere to turn. we work to remove the barriers that cause displacement and provide the means for transition from homelessness to stable…

Housing & Shelter
4
Center for Community Solutions

The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…

Health
5
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
6
Family Care Network Inc

The mission of the Family Care Network is to enhance the wellbeing of children, adults, and families in partnership with our community.

—
7
Assistance League of Anaheim
Community Improvement
8
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
9
Casa de Esperanza

Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…

Human Services
10
National Charity League - Capistrano Coast Chapter

To foster mother-daughter relationships in a philanthropic organization committed to community service, leadership development, and cultural experiences.

—
11
Human Services Association

The principal mission of Human Services Association is to provide families with compassionate and comprehensive care to promote wellness and build strong communities.

Human Services
12
Mercy House Living Centers

Mercy house's most significant exempt activities focus on ending homelessness and providing comprehensive housing and support services. the organization offers homeless prevention, rapid rehousing, permanent supportive housing, and…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Seniorserv Inc; the most unlike its peers is Discovery Arts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOMEFRONT AMERICA INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesHOMEFRONT AMERICA INCIllumination Health Home formerly The Illumination Foundation: $4,000 · Human ServicesIllumination Health Home…LAURA'S HOUSE: $1,800 · Human ServicesLAURA'S HOUSERONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $4,800 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHE…DISCOVERY ARTS: $2,000 · OtherDISCOVERY ARTSBEYOND BLINDNESS: $2,000 · OtherBEYOND BLINDNESSNATIONAL CHARITY LEAGUE LAGUNA: $1,500 · OtherNATIONAL CHARITY LEAGUE LAGUNANATIONAL CHARITY LEAGUE INC NEWPORT CHAPTER: $1,500 · OtherNATIONAL CHARITY LEAGUE INC NEWPORT CHAPT…OCEAN INSTITUTE: $3,000 · OtherOCEAN INSTITUTEThe Collaborative Courts Foundation: $2,000 · OtherThe Collaborative Courts FoundationBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CAPISTRANO VALLEY: $2,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CAPISTRANO VALLEYNATIONAL CHARITY LEAGUE NORTH TUSTIN CHAPTER: $1,500 · OtherNATIONAL CHARITY LEAGUE NORTH TUSTIN CHAP…FAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $6,000 · PhilanthropyFAMILY ASSIS…SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $4,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVE…COMMUNITY SENIORSERV INC: $2,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY SE…COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE OF ORANGE COUNTY: $4,000 · Civil RightsSADDLES IN SERVICE: $2,000 · HealthExtraordinary Lives Foundation: $1,800 · HealthJF SHEA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC FKA FRAN JOSWICK THERAP RIDING CTR INC: $3,000 · Recreation & Sports
Human Services$11,800Other$20,300Philanthropy$6,000Food & Nutrition$6,000Civil Rights$4,000Health$3,800Recreation & Sports$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOMEFRONT AMERICA INC: $6,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetFAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $4,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIllumination Health Home formerly The Illumination Foundation: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE OF ORANGE COUNTY: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJF SHEA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC FKA FRAN JOSWICK THERAP RIDING CTR INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOCEAN INSTITUTE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDISCOVERY ARTS: $2,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetThe Collaborative Courts Foundation: $2,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CAPISTRANO VALLEY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBEYOND BLINDNESS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSADDLES IN SERVICE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY SENIORSERV INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetExtraordinary Lives Foundation: $1,800 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLAURA'S HOUSE: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CHARITY LEAGUE LAGUNA: $1,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNATIONAL CHARITY LEAGUE NORTH TUSTIN CHAPTER: $1,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNATIONAL CHARITY LEAGUE INC NEWPORT CHAPTER: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Communi…McBETH FOUNDATIONO L Halsell FoundationOneocSisters of St Joseph …Sempra FoundationEnterprise Holdings F…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Network for GoodAmerican Endowment Fo…National Philanthropi…Natl Christian Charit…
Orange County Community FoundationCA19.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · McBETH FOUNDATION · O L Halsell Foundation · Oneoc · Sisters of St Joseph Healthcare Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Charity League Inc - Monarch Chapter funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Charity League Inc - Monarch Chapter. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $21k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on National Charity League Inc - Monarch Chapter’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home