Loading…
· Public charity
NATIONAL CHARITY LEAGUE INC - MONARCH CHAPTER
To foster mother and daughter relationships through a philanthropic organization dedicated to community service, leadership development, and cultural experiences.
$33k
Granted FY2024
5
Grants
1
Communities
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
0179% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Human Services$12kPhilanthropy$6kFood & Nutrition$6kCivil Rights$4kHealth$4kReligion$3kRecreation & Sports$3kCrime & Legal$2kYouth Development$2kOther$13k
02FY2024 · 5 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$165k
Total assets
Largest grants
- HOMEFRONT AMERICA INC$3,000
- BEYOND BLINDNESS$3,000
- FAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES FAM$3,000
- JF SHEA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER$3,000
- OCEAN INSTITUTE$3,000
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
31%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$17k · 3 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +69% since the first grant, against +49% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
3
14
Total granted
$17k
$32k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+69%
+49%
Still filing today
100%
100%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionPhilanthropyCivil RightsReligionOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HAHomefront America2× · 2019–2024 · $6k · revenue +108%
Family Assistance Ministries2× · 2019–2024 · $6k · revenue +69%- RMRONALD MCDONALD FAMILY ROOM2× · 2020–2024 · $5k · revenue +17%
Funded once
- COCASA OF ORANGE COUNTYone grant, 2023 · $4k · revenue +12%
- SHSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF OCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $4k · revenue +45%
- IFILLUMINATION FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $4k · revenue +273%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Laurel House Inc dba Hope Harbor
The mission of Laurel House (dba Hope Harbor) is providing a home for teens in crisis, transforming lives, and strengthening families. Laurel House has the only long-term youth shelters in Orange County, CA for runaway, homeless and…
—
2
Human Services Association
(See Schedule O)Provide families with compassionate & comprehensive care to promote wellness & build strong communities.
Human Services
3
Court Appointed Special Advocates of
Recruit, train and supervise volunteers to advocate for abused, neglected and abandoned children placed in foster homes. CASA volunteers ensure children's best interests remain the priority and their needs met while working to establish a…
—
4
National Court Appointed Special
The Association supports state and local CASA and GAL programs which recruit, train, deploy and supervise volunteers to advocate for abused or neglected children.
Civil Rights
5
National Charity League - Capistrano Coast Chapter
To foster mother-daughter relationships in a philanthropic organization committed to community service, leadership development, and cultural experiences.
—
6
California Clubhouse
The mission of California Clubhouse is to provide its members whose lives have been disrupted by mental illness with a daytime place to stay and programs to participatein social activities, engage in meaningful work, enjoy healthy meals,…
Health
7
Children's Village Family Service
To provide permanent support for the activities and programs of the Village Family Service Center.
Human Services
8
My Sisters House Inc
Services for abused women & their children
—
9
Our House Therapy Collective
Mental health services family and group therapy
Health
10
California Court Appointed Special
The mission of california casa is to ensure that children and youth in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems have both a voice and the services they need to thrive. we achieve this by strengthening and empowering californias…
Civil Rights
11
Child Advocates of Contra Costa
The court appointed special advocates (casa) program recruits, trains, and supports volunteer advocates to support abused and neglected children during the court process, to help every child find a permanent home and complete their…
Civil Rights
12
Neighborhood Legal Services
A steadfast advocate for individuals, families, and communities throughout LA County.
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Charity League Inc and the most unlike its peers is Laura's House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Human Services$11,800Other$20,300Philanthropy$6,000Food & Nutrition$6,000Civil Rights$4,000Health$3,800Religion$3,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Homefront America ↗
- Who funds Family Assistance Ministries ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD FAMILY ROOM ↗
- Who funds CASA OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF OC ↗
- Who funds ILLUMINATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OCEAN INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds JF SHEA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER ↗
- Who funds The Blind Childrens Learning Center of Orange County ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Discovery Arts ↗
- Who funds The Collaborative Courts Foundation ↗
- Who funds SADDLES IN SERVICE ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SJC ↗
- Who funds LAURAS HOUSE ↗
- Who funds EXTRAORDINARY LIVES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds National Charity League - Laguna Chapter ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CHARITY LEAGUE NEWPORT ↗
- Who funds North Tustin Chapter - NCL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Orange County Community FoundationCA21.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · O L Halsell Foundation · The Devto Support Foundation · Oneoc · Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · Linda I Smith Foundation · Employees Community Fund of Boeing · Schlinger Family Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation NATIONAL CHARITY LEAGUE INC - MONARCH CHAPTER funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: The Collaborative Courts Foundation.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.3× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 223941228 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on The Collaborative Courts Foundation, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 3% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to National Charity League Inc - Monarch Chapter?
Find your warmest path to National Charity League Inc - Monarch Chapter through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines