· Public charity
National Association of Police Athletic Activities Leagues Inc
Serving members and promoting and putting on programs for the youths.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 61 grants below total $1,252,663 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,671,415 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,418,752 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $29k
- $10k–50k56 grants · $1.2M
- $50k–250k1 grant · $68k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Sheriffs Youth Foundation | $68,400 |
| ICENET PAL | $45,900 |
| Nashua PAL | $36,000 |
| Hollywood PAL | $36,000 |
| Oxnard Police Activities League Inc | $34,200 |
| San Mateo County Sheriff's Activities League | $34,200 |
| Seat Pleasant Police DPT | $31,500 |
| Marietta PAL | $31,500 |
| Police Athletic League of North Miami | $27,000 |
| North Miami Beach PAL | $27,000 |
| STAR PAL | $24,300 |
| Oklahoma City Police Athletic League | $24,300 |
| Prince George's County PAL | $24,300 |
| Albany PAL | $24,300 |
| Police Activities League of Massena | $24,300 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $653k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.
122 repeat relationships — 49 still active in FY2024, 73 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $203k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HPHENRICO POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE7× · 2017–2023 · $753k · revenue +138%
- HPHOLLYWOOD POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE8× · 2017–2024 · $579k · revenue +44% · 33% of their budget
- NPNashua Police Athletic League8× · 2017–2024 · $423k · revenue +159%
Funded once
- KCKing County Sheriffs Office Foundationone grant, 2018 · $47k · revenue -93%
- PHPAL - HALLANDALE BEACHone grant, 2022 · $42k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $40k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Youth & Police Positive Relatio
Juvenile crime prevention program
the organization's mission is the prevention of juvenile delinquency in kern county.
The Police Athletic League of Jacksonville, Inc. is a youth service organization providing the youth of Jacksonville, Florida with an alternative to crime, violence, and drug abuse; provide a comunication link between youth and police…
Supported by Erie Police Department and Erie County Sheriff Department, this organization assists and inspires Erie area youth to realize their full potential as productive members of society and to avoid criminal activity.
A positive alternative to delinquincy
Teaching youth discipline, teamwork, and concentration through sports. benefiting participating children.
To reduce juvinile crime and violence by using police officers and community members as coaches and mentors for the inner city youth.
Youth services activities - Sports and social programs. Programs for the Trenton, NJ area youth consisting of social and recreational activities, after school activities, tutoring and mentoring, baseball, soccr and college tuition…
The police activities league is a youth crime prevention program that relies on educational athletic and other recreational activities to cement a bond between police officers and the youth in our community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Miami Police Athletic League Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Community Resource Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
122 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 122 of the 196 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SHERIFFS YOUTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HENRICO POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds HOLLYWOOD POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds DMV PAL INC ↗
- Who funds Nashua Police Athletic League ↗
- Who funds HOWELL TOWNSHIP POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds MARIETTA POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AND POLICE ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE OF DAVIE INC ↗
- Who funds OXNARD POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds Palatka Police Athletic League Inc ↗
- Who funds Memphis Bears Inc Police Activities League ↗
- Who funds MIAMI BEACH POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds PALM BEACH COUNTY PAL INC ↗
- Who funds Tehama County Police Activities League ↗
- Who funds STURGIS POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE (PAL) ↗
- Who funds DUNN POLICE ATHL & ACT LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE OF WILMINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds STARPAL ↗
- Who funds POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds POLICE-ATHLETIC LEAGUE OF DELAWARE INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUEINC ↗
- Who funds ALBANY POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON DC POLICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MARTIN COUNTY POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGU ↗
- Who funds MEDINA COUNTY POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds POSITIVITY AND LOVE MENTORING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds PINELLAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds SAFE FAMILY JUSTICE CENTERS ↗
- Who funds MONMOUTH OCEAN POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds Richmond Police Activities League ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Good Sports Inc · Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation · Cal Ripken Sr Foundation Inc · National Recreation and Park Association · Boys & Girls Clubs of America · The Wawa Foundation Inc · AT&T Foundation · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Boys & Girls Clubs of America (Group Return) · The Gap Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization National Association of Police Athletic Activities Leagues Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Edadvance — 41% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.