Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Florida · Nonprofit

GREATER MELBOURNE POLICE ATHLETIC L

GREATER MELBOURNE POLICE ATHLETIC L (Florida) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $138,495 to it, the largest being NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POLICE ATHLETIC/ACTIVITIES LEAGUES INC ($130,495). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$196k
Revenue FY2025
5
Funders on record
$138k
Grants received
$29k
Net assets
2/5 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 21%

Against its field

GREATER MELBOURNE POLICE ATHLETIC L's revenue grew 45% between 2017 and 2025.

Operating margin−5% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve1.6mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)5% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,185 youth development nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($135k) Expenses 100 ($166k) Net assets -441 ($-22709)2018 Revenue 121 ($164k) Expenses 102 ($169k) Net assets -548 ($-28205)2019 Revenue 131 ($177k) Expenses 91 ($151k) Net assets -38 ($-1954)2020 Revenue 81 ($109k) Expenses 61 ($102k) Net assets 100 ($5k)2021 Revenue 88 ($119k) Expenses 75 ($125k) Net assets -25 ($-1268)2022 Revenue 160 ($216k) Expenses 96 ($159k) Net assets 1095 ($56k)2023 Revenue 146 ($198k) Expenses 117 ($194k) Net assets 1167 ($60k)2024 Revenue 143 ($194k) Expenses 131 ($217k) Net assets 716 ($37k)2025 Revenue 145 ($196k) Expenses 124 ($206k) Net assets 557 ($29k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (145)Expenses (124)Net assets (557)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 16% · 2018 30% · 2022 35% · 2023 40% · 2024 26% · 2025 14%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

28% of GREATER MELBOURNE POLICE ATHLETIC L’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (83% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 6,375 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$31k
17
$5k
18
$26k
19
$7k
20
$6k
21
$58k
22
$4k
23
$23k
24
$9k
25
1.6
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2022: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $23k → $7k.

From the IRS filings of GREATER MELBOURNE POLICE ATHLETIC L’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 4 of 5 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

GREATER MELBOURNE POLICE ATHLETIC L leans on a few funders — its largest provides 94% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

94% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund GREATER MELBOURNE POLICE ATHLETIC L.

94%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 79% · 2020 84% · 2021 100% · 2022 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

GREATER MELBOURNE POLICE ATHLETIC L draws 95% of its grant income from funders outside Florida, across 3 states in all.

PA
NC
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
Florida out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like GREATER MELBOURNE POLICE ATHLETIC L

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Florida

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

73% of spending goes to programs.

Program 73%Management 27%Fundraising 0%

Governance

9
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for GREATER MELBOURNE POLICE ATHLETIC L: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds GREATER MELBOURNE POLICE ATHLETIC L?
GREATER MELBOURNE POLICE ATHLETIC L (Florida) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $138,495 to it, the largest being NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POLICE ATHLETIC/ACTIVITIES LEAGUES INC ($130,495). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does GREATER MELBOURNE POLICE ATHLETIC L have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $138,495 in grants to GREATER MELBOURNE POLICE ATHLETIC L, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of GREATER MELBOURNE POLICE ATHLETIC L?
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POLICE ATHLETIC/ACTIVITIES LEAGUES INC is the largest funder on record, with $130,495 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like GREATER MELBOURNE POLICE ATHLETIC L find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Florida. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 5funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing