Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nancy-Carroll Draper Char Fdn

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$472k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$1.6MAnimals$1.3MEnvironment$1.3MInternational$5k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $95k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.0M
$30,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DRAPER NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM$471,748
AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION$300,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY IN WYOMING$250,000
FRIENDS OF A LEGACY (FOAL)$30,000
BIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA$30,000
THE ANNE K TAYLOR FUND$25,000
WILD ANIMAL HEALTH FUND$10,000
WILD WELFARE US$7,500
TETON RAPTOR CENTER$6,032
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 58% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%THE ANNE K TAYLOR FUND: $25k → 9%LIVINGSTON DEPOT FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%ELEPHANT FAMILY USA: $5k → 17%WILD WELFARE US: $8k → 16%AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $300k → 14%WILD ANIMAL HEALTH FUND: $10k → 14%THE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE: $5k → 14%ELEPHANT AID INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 23%TETON RAPTOR CENTER: $23k → 5%DRAPER NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM: $472k → 11%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY IN WYOMING: $250k → 17%THE ANNE K TAYLOR FUND: $25k → 9%AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $300k → 14%WILD ANIMAL HEALTH FUND: $6k → 14%WYOMING WILDLIFE ADVOCATES: $7k → 5%DRAPER NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM: $310k → 11%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY IN WYOMING: $250k → 17%THE ANNE K TAYLOR FUND: $20k → 9%AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $200k → 14%WILD ANIMAL HEALTH FUND: $5k → 14%TETON RAPTOR CENTER: $6k → 5%DRAPER NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM: $264k → 11%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY IN WYOMING: $250k → 17%THE ANNE K TAYLOR FUND: $20k → 9%AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $200k → 14%WILD ANIMAL HEALTH FUND: $5k → 14%TETON RAPTOR CENTER: $6k → 5%BUFFALO BILL CENTER OF THE WEST: $195k → 11%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY IN WYOMING: $250k → 17%THE ANNE K TAYLOR FUND: $20k → 9%AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $200k → 14%DRAPER NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM: $162k → 11%WYOMING PBS FOUNDATION: $30k → 17%FRIENDS OF A LEGACY (FOAL): $50k → 11%WYOMING PBS FOUNDATION: $20k → 17%FRIENDS OF A LEGACY (FOAL): $30k → 11%PARK COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER: $15k → 11%FRIENDS OF A LEGACY (FOAL): $10k → 11%PARK COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER: $10k → 11%PARK COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER: $10k → 11%PARK COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
NY
WY
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 9 repeat orgs$235k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
6

Total granted

$2.9M
$227k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+98%
+249%

Still filing today

67%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AW
    AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +20%
  • BL
    BIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA
    5× · 2020–2024 · $140k · revenue +101%
  • AK
    ANNE K TAYLOR FUND
    5× · 2020–2024 · $110k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • BB
    BUFFALO BILL CENTER OF THE WEST
    one grant, 2020 · $195k
  • LD
    LIVINGSTON DEPOT FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +249%
  • WW
    WYOMING WILDLIFE ADVOCATESgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue +82%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wilderness Conservation Foundation
Environment
2
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
3
Panthera Corporation

Panthera's mission is the conservation of the world's 40 wild cat species, many of which are endangered or threatened. panthera develops, implements and oversees wild cat conservation strategies on a global scale.

Animals
4
Wildlife Conservation Society

The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

Animals
5
Wildlife Alliance Inc

Wildlife alliance is the leader in direct protection of forests and wildlife in tropical asia. our mission is to combat deforestation, biodiversity loss, climate change, and poverty by partnering with local communities and governments.…

Animals
6
Predator Defense

Protecting vital native predators & ending war on wildlife.

Animals
7
Wild Landscapes Inc

Wild landscapes, inc. (wli) is dedicated to conserving large and connected landscapes globally significant to wildlife and crucial to local communities. our environmental conservation strategy is to empower communities, conservationists,…

Animals
8
Livewilder Foundation
—
9
Dazzle Africa

Dazzle africa's mission is to partner with local organizations to provide programs in conservation, education and community development. the organization aims to ensure that future generations are self-sufficient and iconic african…

Animals
10
Gallatin Wildlife Association

Promote research and actions to save wildlife.

Animals
11
International Snow Leopard Trust

The international snow leopard trust aims to ethically conserve snow leopards and their high mountain ecosystems through partnerships with indigenous peoples and local communities, and through research to improve the understanding of snow…

Animals
12
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Life Foundation Usa; the most unlike its peers is Livingston Depot Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DRAPER NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM: $1,208,133 · OtherDRAPER NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUMTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,000,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYBUFFALO BILL CENTER OF THE WEST: $195,261 · OtherBUFFALO BILL CENTER OF THE WESTFRIENDS OF A LEGACY (FOAL): $90,000 · Other+3 more: $65,953 · OtherAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $1,200,000 · AnimalsAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INCBIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA: $140,000 · AnimalsBIG LIFE FOUNDATION USAANNE K TAYLOR FUND: $110,000 · AnimalsANNE K TAYLOR FUND+5 more: $64,500 · AnimalsWYOMING PBS FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Arts & CultureLIVINGSTON DEPOT FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,559,347Animals$1,514,500Arts & Culture$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $1,200,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,000,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA: $140,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetANNE K TAYLOR FUND: $110,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetWYOMING PBS FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetPARK COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER: $40,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetTETON RAPTOR CENTER: $34,953 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetLIVINGSTON DEPOT FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetWILD WELFARE US: $7,500 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetWYOMING WILDLIFE ADVOCATES: $7,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCOEXISTENCE STORY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds BIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA ↗
  • Who funds ANNE K TAYLOR FUND ↗
  • Who funds WYOMING PBS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PARK COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds TETON RAPTOR CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LIVINGSTON DEPOT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WILD WELFARE US ↗
  • Who funds WYOMING WILDLIFE ADVOCATES ↗
  • Who funds COEXISTENCE STORY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nancy-Carroll Draper Char Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nancy-Carroll Draper Char Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Nancy-Carroll Draper Char Fdn?

    Find your warmest path to Nancy-Carroll Draper Char Fdn through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nancy-Carroll Draper Char Fdn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph