Skip to content

Texas · Nonprofit

WILD WELFARE US

WILD WELFARE US (Texas) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $30,313 to it, the largest being CONSERVATION SOCIETY OF CALIFORNIA ($15,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$413k
Funders on record
3
Grants received
$30k
Net assets
$159k
1/3 repeat funders
01What it does

What Wild Welfare US does

Mission

To end the suffering of captive wild animals around the world, by uniting the world's leading animal welfare organizations and captive wildlife facilities in providing expert, practical, and sustainable solutions to improve animal welfare.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Lok Kawi Wildlife Park in Sabah, Malaysia: training staff to train elephants, consulting on design and construction of new elephant barns and assisting, coordinating elephant moves to new barn.

    $62,579 spentof which $82,500 as grants
    15% of program spending
  2. Public Education: Auditor training (for auditing animal welfare standards), workshops, presentations at animal care facilities and sanctuaries.

    $35,799 spent$35,023 earned by the program
    9% of program spending
  3. Gave presentations at several animal association conferences on topics of animal wellness and animal welfare auditing and assessements.

    $3,274 spent
    1% of program spending
  4. Grants given for either research or conducting welfare assessments, audits, or workshops.

    $290,000 spent
    71% of program spending
  5. Program administration fees

    $16,544 spent
    4% of program spending

The 5 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $408,196.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2022, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2022, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20222022 Revenue 100 ($165k) Expenses 100 ($73k) Net assets 100 ($92k)2023 Revenue 311 ($513k) Expenses 455 ($333k) Net assets 407 ($375k)2024 Revenue 208 ($343k) Expenses 354 ($259k) Net assets 231 ($212k)2025 Revenue 250 ($413k) Expenses 637 ($466k) Net assets 173 ($159k)
2022202320242025
Revenue (250)Expenses (637)Net assets (173)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $92k to $375k (+307%).

$92k
$375k
$212k
$159k
2022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

90% of WILD WELFARE US’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (86% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 7,042 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 4 reported years ran a deficit.

$92k
’22
$180k
’23
$84k
’24
−$53k
’25
4.0
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Margaret Whittaker

Executive Director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

202320242025
Listed699
Joined·+3+1
No longer listed·01
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.

1 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 26% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of WILD WELFARE US’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

WILD WELFARE US leans on a few funders — its largest provides 49% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

75% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund WILD WELFARE US.

49%
largest funder
100%
top three
~3
effective funders

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

WILD WELFARE US draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Texas, across 2 states in all.

MA
CA

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $8k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

WILD WELFARE US has grown faster than three-quarters of the 3,693 animals nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−13% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve4.0mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)36% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,693 animals nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like WILD WELFARE US

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

88% of spending goes to programs.

Program 88%Management 11%Fundraising 1%

Governance

6
board members
33%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

TX

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WILD WELFARE US: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds WILD WELFARE US?
WILD WELFARE US (Texas) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $30,313 to it, the largest being CONSERVATION SOCIETY OF CALIFORNIA ($15,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does WILD WELFARE US have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $30,313 in grants to WILD WELFARE US, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of WILD WELFARE US?
CONSERVATION SOCIETY OF CALIFORNIA is the largest funder on record, with $15,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like WILD WELFARE US find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Wild Welfare US →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2022–2025), and the filings of 3 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing