· Public charity
NADA Foundation
The NADA Foundation operates exclusively for charitable and educational purposes.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 2 grants below total $161,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $677,565 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $516,565 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $136k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Canine Companions for Independence | $136,000 |
| Vehicles for Change | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $187k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.
The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.
Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…
Dunwoody college changes lives by building opportunities for graduates to have successful careers, to develop into leaders and entrepreneurs, and to engage in "the better performance of life's duties." quote is from the last will and…
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
St. francis college is an independent, coeducational institution of higher education chartered by an act of the regents of the university of the state of new york on april 10, 1957.
Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…
Empowering learners to achieve excellence by linking knowledge to practice.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mary Bridge Children's Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Shau-Wai & Marie Lam Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
71 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 71 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds Northwood University ↗
- Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF LOUISIANA ↗
- Who funds THE EMERIL LAGASSE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VEHICLES FOR CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR AUTOMOTIVE EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds SADD INC ↗
- Who funds ASE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE SHAU-WAI & MARIE LAM FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HAZELWILD FARM EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INDEPENDENT COLLEGES OF WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY COLLEGE ENDOWMENT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE BRIDGE MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds REGIS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds CHINATOWN MANPOWER PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHSTAR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEW JERSEY CHINESE AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC ↗
- Who funds PARTICULAR COUNCIL OF TACOMA SOCIETY OF SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL ↗
- Who funds SAINT MARTIN'S UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CAMP H-TOWN ↗
- Who funds TEAMMATES MENTORING PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds Leukemia Research Foundation of DE ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF DELAWARE ↗
- Who funds SOUTHSIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL OF THE UPSTATE ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds MARY BRIDGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds PENNSYLVANIA AUTOMOTIVE ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds CEDAR SINAI PARK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CAMPBELL UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Honor Flight Maine Inc ↗
- Who funds Life Support ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds NH AUTOMOTIVE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · Wells Fargo Foundation · Truist Foundation Inc · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · AbbVie Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization NADA Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- United Way of Delaware — 58% of income from government
- Vehicles for Change Inc — 16% of income from government
- Bayhealth Foundation Corporation — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.