Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nabholz Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$593k
Granted FY2025still arriving
49
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$72k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.9MHealth$1.7MReligion$677kAnimals$527kPhilanthropy$450kHuman Services$413kArts & Culture$199kHousing & Shelter$193kOther$0
02FY2025 · 49 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k32 grants · $85k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $303k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $204k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$962k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONWAY REGIONAL HEALTH FOUND INC$71,580
ARK MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS$70,000
CARTI FOUNDATION INC$62,500
DRURY UNIVERSITY$40,000
OUR HOUSE INC$32,500
WOMEN & CHILDREN FIRST THE CENTER A$32,500
JONESBORO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT$22,000
CITY OF HOPE OUTREACH$20,500
ST JOSEPH SCHOOL$20,500
UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS$20,000
NORTHWEST ARKANSAS FOOD BANK$20,000
HEARTLAND FORWARD INC$20,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$20,000
PHILANDER SMITH UNIVERSITY$17,500
UNIVERSITY OF ARK LR$14,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $142k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RENEWAL RANCH: $6k → 16%YMCA OF GREATER TULSA: $33k → 15%ARVAC INC: $5k → 15%RENEWAL RANCH: $3k → 16%RENEWAL RANCH: $1k → 16%YMCA OF GREATER TULSA: $13k → 15%RENEWAL RANCH: $500 → 16%THE GAINES HOUSE: $1k → 17%CROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT: $25k → 15%OKLAHOMA METHODIST MANOR: $10k → 15%INDEPENDENT LIVING SERVICES INC: $1k → 15%INDEPENDENT LIVING SERVICES: $500 → 15%INDEPENDENT LIVING SERVICES INC: $250 → 15%INDEPENDENT LIVING SERVICES INC: $200 → 15%INDEPENDENT LIVING SERVICES INC: $200 → 15%ARKANSAS MISSION OF MERCY: $5k → 15%BETHLEHEM HOUSE: $3k → 15%BETHLEHEM HOUSE: $3k → 15%WORLD SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $12k → 17%COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS: $1k → 15%WORLD SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 17%CENTERS FOR YOUTH & FAMILIES: $3k → 17%CENTERS FOR YOUTH & FAMILIES: $3k → 17%BETHLEHEM HOUSE INC: $1k → 15%CENTERS FOR YOUTH & FAMILIES: $3k → 17%COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS: $1k → 15%CENTERS FOR YOUTH & FAMILIES: $500 → 17%COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS: $1k → 15%BETHLEHEM HOUSE: $1k → 15%COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS: $500 → 15%BETHLEHEM HOUSE: $250 → 15%COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS: $250 → 15%VERA LLOYD PRESBYTERIAN FAMILY SVS: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
IA
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
MD
KS
AR
TN
DC
OK
LA
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.8M · 120 repeat orgs$717k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

120 repeat relationships: 42 still active in FY2025, 78 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

120
147

Total granted

$5.8M
$697k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+20%

Still filing today

38%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL AR FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $592k · revenue +50%
  • CR
    Conway Regional Health Foundation Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $334k · revenue +22%
  • CF
    CARTI Foundation Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $208k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • AW
    AR WATERFOWL ASSOC CENTER FOR YOUTH
    one grant, 2018 · $30k
  • AC
    AR COMMUNITY FDNFAULKNER CTY
    one grant, 2017 · $26k
  • OS
    Oklahoma State University Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +43%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arkansas Foundation for Medical Care Inc

To promote excellence in health care through evaluation and education

Health
2
Opportunity Arkansas Foundation

Renewing the land of opportunity by simplifying government and solving generational problems for the next generation.

Philanthropy
3
Foundation of the Arkansas Sports Hall of Fame

To honor the legacy of Arkansas sports history

Arts & Culture
4
Arkansas Hospice Inc

To enhance the quality of life for those facing serious illness and loss by surrounding them with love and embracing them with the best in physical, emotional and spiritual care programs and services, and to help donors meet their…

Human Services
5
Arkansas Pharmacy Foundation

Promote profession of pharmacy in the state of arkansas.

Health
6
Disability Rights Arkansas Inc

To vigorously advocate for and enforce the legal rights of people with disabilities in arkansas.

Civil Rights
7
Arkansas Bankers Association Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Arkansas Hunger Relief Alliance Inc

The alliance is a collaborative organization that works on behalf of arkansans facing hunger.

Food & Nutrition
9
Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families

Advocating for the development and implementation of data-driven public policy that improves child well-being in arkansas, with a focus on economic security, education, health, early childhood, child welfare, juvenile justice, and racial…

Human Services
10
Arkansas Coalition Against Domestic Violence

Provide help to domestic violence victims and encourage community efforts to promote domestic peace.

—
11
Arkansas Nonprofit News Network

Producing journalism that matters to Arkansans.

Arts & Culture
12
The Arkansas Center for Independence

Habilitation and residential services for adults with developmental disabilities

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pepper Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

100 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 100 of the 276 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
23
Early backer (in before they grew)
97/100
Grantees still filing
66/100
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JOHNNY MORRIS WONDERS OF WILDLIFE: $500,000 · OtherJOHNNY MORRIS WONDERS OF WILDLIFEAR CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $471,350 · OtherAR CHILDREN'S HOSPITALHENDRIX COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $287,600 · OtherHENDRIX COLLEGE FOUNDATIONST JOSEPH CHURCH: $276,350 · OtherST JOSEPH CHURCHACH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $244,000 · OtherACH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION+143 more: $2,514,865 · Other+143 moreUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL AR FOUNDATION INC: $591,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CENT…JOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY: $161,000 · EducationJOHN BROWN UNIVERS…Drury University: $160,000 · EducationDrury UniversityPhilander Smith College: $37,500 · Education+8 more: $102,500 · Education+8 moreConway Regional Health Foundation Inc: $334,080 · HealthConway Regio…CARTI Foundation Inc: $208,100 · HealthCARTI Founda…RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ARKANSAS & NORTH LOUISIANA INC: $78,500 · HealthRONALD MCDON…CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $45,250 · HealthCHILDREN'S T…+7 more: $72,200 · Health+7 moreCONWAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $45,500 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER TULSA: $45,000 · Human ServicesCROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesWORLD SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $17,200 · Human ServicesTRINITY WOODS INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesRENEWAL RANCH: $9,500 · Human ServicesCENTERS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesBETHLEHEM HOUSE INC: $7,250 · Human Services+9 more: $28,100 · Human ServicesArkansas Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc: $64,200 · Housing & ShelterDEPAUL USA INC: $13,500 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterOKPOP FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF BERRYVILLE LIBRARY INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MUSEUM OF AUTOMOBILES INC: $12,500 · Arts & CultureThe Muses Inc: $4,900 · Arts & CultureBLACKBIRD ACADEMY OF ARTS INC: $4,000 · Arts & CultureARGENTA ARTS FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $3,800 · Arts & CultureHeartland Forward Inc: $60,000 · Community Improvement
Other$4,294,165Education$1,052,500Health$738,130Human Services$195,550Housing & Shelter$78,700Arts & Culture$67,700Community Improvement$60,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL AR FOUNDATION INC: $591,500 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetConway Regional Health Foundation Inc: $334,080 over 9y, 3.3% of budgetCARTI Foundation Inc: $208,100 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetJOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY: $161,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetDrury University: $160,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOUR HOUSE INC: $92,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ARKANSAS & NORTH LOUISIANA INC: $78,500 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetJONESBORO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP: $66,000 over 3y, 29% of budgetArkansas Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc: $64,200 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetNORTHWEST ARKANSAS FOOD BANK: $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHeartland Forward Inc: $60,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetARKANSAS FOODBANK: $49,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL STATE COUNCIL: $46,215 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetCONWAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $45,500 over 5y, 9.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $45,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER TULSA: $45,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPhilander Smith College: $37,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CITY OF HOPE OUTREACH: $32,500 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOKPOP FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetEQUITABLE FACILITIES FUND INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAST ARKANSAS BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetST VINCENT FOUNDATION: $19,600 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetTHE STEVE AZAR ST CECILIA FOUNDATION: $17,500 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetWORLD SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $17,200 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHays Medical Center Foundation: $16,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBaptist Health Foundation Inc: $15,100 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetARKANSAS STATE POLICE FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF BERRYVILLE LIBRARY INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE ROTARY CLUB 99 FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetLIFE CHOICES INC: $14,500 over 9y, 2.4% of budgetDEPAUL USA INC: $13,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS INC: $12,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF AUTOMOBILES INC: $12,500 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetLYON COLLEGE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONWAY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetNEW COVENANT ACADEMY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCIVITAN CENTER: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINTEGRIS Health INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY WOODS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREBOOT RECOVERY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRENEWAL RANCH: $9,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetARKANSAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $9,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTERS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBETHLEHEM HOUSE INC: $7,250 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetGreater Kansas City Community Foundation: $5,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARVAC INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL AR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Conway Regional Health Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CARTI Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds JOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Drury University ↗
  • Who funds OUR HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ARKANSAS & NORTH LOUISIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds JONESBORO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
  • Who funds Arkansas Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST ARKANSAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Heartland Forward Inc ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS FOODBANK ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL STATE COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds CONWAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER TULSA ↗
  • Who funds Philander Smith College ↗
  • Who funds THE CITY OF HOPE OUTREACH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arkansas Community Foundation IncAR95.3× affinity57 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Arvest Foundation · Riggs Benevolent Fund · Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable And · Adcock Family Foundation · Windgate Charitable Foundation Inc · Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc · Brown Foundation · Heart of Arkansas United Way · Delta Dental of Arkansas Foundation Inc · Walton Family Foundation Inc · C Louis and Mary C Cabe Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nabholz Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nabholz Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Nabholz Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Nabholz Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 276 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nabholz’s filings →

More from the funding graph