· Private foundation
Adcock Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $8k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $128k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST JOSEPH SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| RENEWAL RANCH | $50,000 |
| BETHLEHEM HOUSE INC | $42,656 |
| CITY OF HOPE OUTREACH | $25,000 |
| YOUTH ADVOCATE & RESOURCE NETWORK I | $18,672 |
| SOUL FOOD CAFE MISSION | $16,120 |
| CENTRAL BAPTIST COLLEGE | $16,050 |
| CARTI FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| CREATIVE INSTITIUTE OF CENTRAL ARKA | $3,900 |
| CONWAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS | $1,386 |
| UNITED WAY OF FAULKNER COUNTY | $1,000 |
| HAVEN | $1,000 |
| HENDRIX COLLEGE | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $403k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +49% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $83k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RRRENEWAL RANCH8× · 2017–2025 · $355k · revenue +96%
- TCTHE CITY OF HOPE OUTREACH8× · 2018–2025 · $210k · revenue +215%
- CRConway Regional Health Foundation Inc5× · 2019–2023 · $50k · revenue +20%
Funded once
- CFCONWAY FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -86% · 35% of their budget
- FFFRIENDSHIP FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -55% · 34% of their budget
- GSGREENBRIER SCHOOL - FFAone grant, 2024 · $23k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Educational institution for primary and secondary age students in a non- public christian curriculum and environment
The organization and its volunteers serve as advocates for abused and neglected children.
To honor the legacy of Arkansas sports history
Nurturing hope, encouraging health, and promoting healing in troubled families through community collaboration, communication and cooperation
The organization promotes educational activities which foster entrepreneurial development in arkansas with the goal of increasing business startup creation and leadership development.
The organization provides a therapeutic shelter and care for homeless and/or abused children.
The mission of conway cancer foundation is to provide education and support for cancer patients and their families.
To provide care for needy children and young adults.
To accept, hold, invest, reinvest and administer gifts, bequests, devises, benefits of trust (but not to act as trustee of any trust), and property of any sort, without limitation as to amount of value, and to use, disburse or donate the…
The primary purpose of the University of Arkansas Hope - Texarkana Foundation is to advance higher education by securing private financial support for all units and activities of the University of Arkansas Hope Texarkana.
To provide assistance to victims of domestic abuse and to educate the community to work toward the prevention of family violence.
Arkansas baptist assembly, inc. is a christian summer camp for children and teenagers, and an all year retreat and conference center for churches and other organizations. it is an agency of the arkansas baptist state convention.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Central Ar Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Alex Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RENEWAL RANCH ↗
- Who funds THE CITY OF HOPE OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds CONWAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Conway Regional Health Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds FRIENDSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BETHLEHEM HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL AR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HENDRIX COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds BLACKBIRD ACADEMY OF ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds CARTI Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds SOARING WINGS RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH ADVOCATE RESOURCE NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds RAZORBACK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COMPASS ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds Baptist Health Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds DELIVER HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds THE CALL ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF FAULKNER COU ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds ALEX FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATURAL STATE COUNCIL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Nabholz Charitable Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Windgate Charitable Foundation Inc · Riggs Benevolent Fund · Simmons First Foundation Inc · The Sunderland Foundation · C Louis and Mary C Cabe Foundation · Delta Dental of Arkansas Foundation Inc · Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable And · United Way of Central Arkansas Inc · Central Arkansas Planning & Development District Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Adcock Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.