How much did MOSES CONE - WESLEY LONG COMMUNITY grant in FY2024?

MOSES CONE - WESLEY LONG COMMUNITY reported 32 grants totaling $4,817,755 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is MOSES CONE - WESLEY LONG COMMUNITY based?

MOSES CONE - WESLEY LONG COMMUNITY is based in NC.

MOSES CONE - WESLEY LONG COMMUNITY

Foundation Dossiers

· Public charity

MOSES CONE - WESLEY LONG COMMUNITY

To invest in the development and support of activities, programs and organizations that measurably improve the health of people in the greater greensboro area.

$4.8M

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$701k

Largest

01What you fund

0167% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.

Health$9.3MHuman Services$6.2MEducation$1.5MCommunity Improvement$1.3MCrime & Legal$1.3MPhilanthropy$971kArts & Culture$194kHousing & Shelter$50kFood & Nutrition$45kOther$11M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

access healthcaremental wellnesswellness outreachexceptionaladolescent pregnancypregnancy preventionfree hiv

2020

living hivhiv aidsaccess healthcareadolescent pregnancypregnancy preventionwellness outreachexceptional

2021

access healthcarewellness outreachmental wellnessexceptionaladolescent pregnancypregnancy preventionfree hiv

2022

special situationsoutreach wellnesssituations wellnessaccess healthcarewellness outreachmental wellnessadolescent pregnancy

2023

responsechurchintegratedprogrammingyouthsimpleevery

2024

responselegalhealthyinnovativeabortiongfmfoods

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k3 grants · $21k
$10k–50k7 grants · $121k
$50k–250k15 grants · $1.5M
$250k+7 grants · $2.7M

$55,000

Median grant

States reached

$124M

Total assets

Largest grants

EAST MARKET STREET DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$701,000
FAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC$407,994
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL$358,711
KELLIN FOUNDATION$343,355
GUILFORD ADULT HEALTH$341,358
LEGAL AID OF NORTH CAROLINA$286,679
CODE THE DREAM INC$250,000
ALCOHOL AND DRUG SERVICES OF GUILFORD INC$219,461
CONE HEALTH CONGREGATIONAL & COMMUNITY NURSE PROGR$204,036
PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC$175,000
TRIAD HEALTH PROJECT$161,000
NCDHHS - DIVISION OF CHILD AND FAMILY WELL-BEING$125,000
GUILFORD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH PHARMA$112,000
GREENSBORO HOUSING COALITION$101,500
ACTION GREENSBORO$75,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $5.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$30M · 40 repeat orgs$2.0M to everyone else

40 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$30M

$856k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%

+66%

Still filing today

85%

67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

FS
Family Service of the Piedmont Inc
7× · 2018–2024 · $3.8M · revenue +25%
CH
Cone Health Regional Center for Infectious Disease
7× · 2018–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +80%
TH
Triad Health Project
7× · 2018–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +155%

Funded once

PF
Partnership for Community Care
one grant, 2018 · $141k · revenue -100%
YO
YMCA of Greensboro
one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -8%
CH
Community Housing Solutions of Guilford Incgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +206%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Carolina Family Health Centers Inc

Provide quality healthcare to the people of edgecombe, nash and wilson counties.

—

Housing for New Hope

Ending homelessness in durham, north carolina

Housing & Shelter

Triad Adult & Pediatric Medicine Inc

Triad Adult and Pediatric Medicine provides the residents of Guilford County, NC with exceptional healthcare that is comprehensive and delivered with compassion and respect.

Health

Carteret County General Hospital Foundation

For promotion and support of carteret general hospital

Philanthropy

Wnc Health Network Inc

WNC Health Network, Inc supports people and organizations to improve community health and wellbeing across Western North Carolina.

Health

North Carolina Community Health Center Assoc Inc

To promote community based primary health care systems in medically underserved areas.

Health

Granville Health Inc

To provide medical services to the community of granville county north carolina.

Health

Carolinas Center for Medical Excellence Found

Health

Forward Justice Action Network

Forward Justice Action Network is a nonprofit with the purpose to engage in educati onal and advocacy activities to promote political and grassroots support for publi c policies that advance racial social and economic justice in North…

Human Services

One Charlotte Health Alliance Llc

The ONE Charlotte Health Alliance Mission is to convene and align partnerships to improve health in under served communities

—

First Choice Community Health Ctrs

Providing healthcare to the underserved population of Harnett County NC and the surrounding area.

Health

Equality Nc

Securing equality and justice for lgbtq north carolinians.

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foundation for Health Leadership and and the most unlike its peers is East Market Street Development. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

1%1/99

the rest of the field

13%

1,247/9,505

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

77 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

75/77

Grantees still filing

58/77

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$10,897,838Health$9,308,585Human Services$6,169,974Education$1,541,163Community Improvement$1,344,750Crime & Legal$1,335,008Philanthropy$970,758

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of GreaterNC85.2× affinity41 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater · Tannenbaum-Sternberger Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Greensboro Inc · Weaver Foundation Inc · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · The Foundation for a Healthy High Point · David and Claudia Babb Reich · The Mary Lynn Richardson Fund · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital · Well-Spring Retirement Community Inc · Truist Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation MOSES CONE - WESLEY LONG COMMUNITY funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Guilford Adult Health Inc.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~18 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 043726317 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Guilford Adult Health Inc, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 18 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 67% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Moses Cone - Wesley Long Community?

Find your warmest path to Moses Cone - Wesley Long Community through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

MOSES CONE - WESLEY LONG COMMUNITY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

77 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Moses Cone - Wesley Long Community?

More from the funding graph

MOSES CONE - WESLEY LONG COMMUNITY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

77 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Moses Cone - Wesley Long Community?

More from the funding graph