Skip to content

· Private foundation

Morton & Sophia Macht Foundation Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$824k
Granted FY2026still arriving
17
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$713k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Youth Development$1.2MHuman Services$307kEducation$207kReligion$61kInternational$11kRecreation & Sports$6kHealth$3kEnvironment$3kOther$0
02FY2026 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k13 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $95k
  • $250k+1 grant · $713k
$500
Median grant
1
States reached
$738k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARTS FOR LEARNING MARYLAND (FUNDED THROUGH COMMUNITY PROGRAM CENTERS LLC)$713,076
THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION - THE SHRIVER CENTER AT UMBC$38,085
COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC$32,259
THE Y OF CENTRAL MARYLAND$25,000
NEW CREATION CHRISTIAN CHURCH$8,500
MOROVIA PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$2,500
VANGUARD COLLEGIATE MIDDLE SCHOOL$1,000
FRANCISCAN CENTER INC$500
PRESERVATION MARYLAND$500
CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC$500
FRIENDS OF MARYLAND'S OLMSTEAD PARKS AND LANDSCAPES INC$250
SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF MARYLAND$250
TURN AROUND FAMILY SERVICES INC$250
IT'S ABOUT THE KIDS EDUCATION ORGANIZATION INC$250
TOWSON ELKS 469 CHARITY FUND INC$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–26, $366k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HELPING ORPHANS PROSPER EVERYWHERE INC: $500 → 11%HELPING ORPHANS PROSPER EVERYWHERE INC: $500 → 11%HELPING ORPHANS PROSPER EVERYWHERE (HOPE): $250 → 11%THE Y OF CENTRAL MARYLAND: $25k → 11%YMCA OF CENTRAL MARYLAND: $25k → 11%TURNAROUND: $250 → 11%TURNAROUND INC: $250 → 11%SANTA CLAUS ANONYMOUS: $250 → 11%SANTA CLAUS ANONYMOUS: $250 → 11%SANTA CLAUS ANONYMOUS: $250 → 11%FRANCISCAN CENTER: $500 → 19%FRANCISCAN CENTER INC: $500 → 19%FRANCISCAN CENTER: $300 → 19%FRANCISCAN CENTER: $300 → 19%FRANCISCAN CENTER: $300 → 19%FRANCISCAN CENTER: $300 → 19%COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE NETWORK: $107k → 19%COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE NETWORK: $79k → 19%COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE NETWORK: $45k → 19%COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE NETWORK: $35k → 19%COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC: $32k → 19%COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE NETWORK: $13k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 23 repeat orgs$186k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2026, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
13

Total granted

$2.4M
$144k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+32%

Still filing today

61%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YM
    Young Men's Christian Association of Central Maryland Inc
    2× · 2023–2026 · $50k · revenue +12%
  • CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2021–2026 · $3k · revenue +16%
  • FC
    FRANCISCAN CENTER INC
    6× · 2021–2026 · $2k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • YG
    YMCA GOODNOW (FUNDED THROUGH COMMUNITY PROGRAM CENTERS LLC)
    one grant, 2022 · $36k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION - SHRIVER PEACEWORKER PROGRAM
    one grant, 2021 · $33k
  • YC
    YMCA COLLEGE (FUNDED THROUGH COMMUNITY PROGRAM CENTERS LLC)
    one grant, 2022 · $31k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Economic Alliance of Greater Baltimore Foundation
—
2
Ywca of Annapolis & Anne Arundel County Maryland Inc

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all with an emphasis on domestic violence and crisis intervention services.

—
3
Maryland Center On Economic Policy Inc

The maryland center on economic policy advances innovative policy ideas to foster broad prosperity and help our state be the standard-bearer for responsible public policy.

Social Science
4
Community Law Center Inc

Community law center is maryland's only legal services organization dedicated solely to strengthening neighborhoods and the nonprofit sector. for over 30 years, community law center's attorneys have been providing learning opportunities…

Crime & Legal
5
Hopeworks of Howard County Inc

Hopeworks mission is to provide support and advocacy for people in howard county affected by sexual and intimate partner violence and engage the community in creating the change required for prevention.

Human Services
6
Somebody Cares Baltimore Inc

Community based nonprofit organization

Religion
7
Manna House Inc

To offer assistance and support to the homeless, poor and needy of baltimore with services contributing toward their independence and stability.

—
8
Family and Children's Services of Centra

To transform the lives of children and adults by providing opportunities to build self-confidence, resilience and hope.

Human Services
9
Health Care for the Homeless Inc

Health care for the homeless works to end homelessness through racially equitable health care, housing and advocacy in partnership with those of us who have experienced it.

—
10
Maryland Works Inc

To promote economic and workforce development strategies that assure full inclusion of individuals with disabilities and other barriers to employment.

Employment
11
The Women's Law Center of Md Inc

Our mission is to ensure the physical safety, economic security, and autonomy of women throughout the state. the women's law center of md works towards this goal by providing direct legal representation, information and referral services,…

—
12
Community Mediation Program Inc

To provide free mediation services in the baltimore metropolitan area for the purposes of reducing interpersonal and community violence. the program also provides community education and conflict resolution training.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Men's Christian Association of Central Maryland Inc; the most unlike its peers is Helping Orphans Prosper Everywhere. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARTS FOR LEARNING MARYLAND (FUNDED THROUGH COMMUNITY PROGRAM CENTERS LLC): $1,816,575 · OtherARTS FOR LEARNING MARYLAND (FUNDED THROUGH COMMUNITY PROGRAM CENTERS LLC)UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION - SHRIVER PEACEWORKS: $141,650 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION - SHRIVER PEACEWORKS+28 more: $273,622 · Other+28 moreCOMMUNITY ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC: $311,393 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ASSIS…Young Men's Christian Association of Central Maryland Inc: $50,000 · Human ServicesYoung Men's Chr…+4 more: $4,700 · Human ServicesCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · EnvironmentSOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF MARYLAND ANTIQUITIES INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureGREATER BALTIMORE CULTURAL ALLIANCE INC: $750 · Arts & CultureTOWSON ELKS #469 CHARITY FUND INC: $1,250 · Community ImprovementSPECIAL OLYMPICS MARYLAND INC: $1,250 · Recreation & SportsNAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC: $1,000 · Civil Rights
Other$2,231,847Human Services$366,093Environment$3,000Arts & Culture$2,750Community Improvement$1,250Recreation & Sports$1,250Civil Rights$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC: $311,393 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Central Maryland Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFRANCISCAN CENTER INC: $2,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF MARYLAND ANTIQUITIES INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTOWSON ELKS #469 CHARITY FUND INC: $1,250 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetHELPING ORPHANS PROSPER EVERYWHERE: $1,250 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MARYLAND INC: $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING UP MISSION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEGAL MOMENTUM: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BALTIMORE CULTURAL ALLIANCE INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA CLAUS ANONYMOUS INC: $750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTURNAROUND INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEXUALITY INFORMATION AND EDUCATION COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INC: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Central Maryland Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRANCISCAN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF MARYLAND ANTIQUITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds TOWSON ELKS #469 CHARITY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds HELPING ORPHANS PROSPER EVERYWHERE ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MARYLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds HELPING UP MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL MOMENTUM ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BALTIMORE CULTURAL ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds SANTA CLAUS ANONYMOUS INC ↗
  • Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF THE CHESAPEAKE INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNAROUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SEXUALITY INFORMATION AND EDUCATION COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

France-Merrick Foundation IncMD19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: France-Merrick Foundation Inc · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · The John J Leidy Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Foundation · The Abell Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Morton & Sophia Macht Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Morton & Sophia Macht Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Society for the Preservation of Maryland Antiquities Inc: 50% of income from government
  • Young Men's Christian Association of Central Maryland Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Turnaround Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Goodwill Industries of the Chesapeake Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Community Assistance Network Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Helping Up Mission Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Greater Baltimore Cultural Alliance Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Franciscan Center Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Morton & Sophia Macht Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Morton & Sophia Macht Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Morton & Sophia Macht’s filings →

More from the funding graph