How much did MORTON & SOPHIA MACHT FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 84% of MORTON & SOPHIA MACHT FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2021

shriver peaceworkerchesapeake

2022

baltimorefundedshriver peaceworksadvocacy civic

2023

advocacy civicshriver peaceworks

2024

greater baltimoreshriver peaceworks

2025

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k9 grants · $4k
$10k–50k1 grant · $17k
$50k–250k2 grants · $138k
$250k+1 grant · $507k

$500

Median grant

States reached

$1.7M

Total assets

Largest grants

ARTS FOR LEARNING MARYLAND (FUNDED THROUGH COMMUNITY PROGRAM CENTERS LLC)$507,077
COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE NETWORK$79,259
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION - SHRIVER PEACEWORKS$59,150
NEW CREATION CHRISTIAN CHURCH$17,000
ARCHBISHOP CURLEY HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF THE CHESAPEAKE INC$500
CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION$500
FRANCISCAN CENTER$500
TOWSON ELKS CHARITY FUND$250
TALITHA CUMI SAFE HAVEN$250
IT'S ABOUT THE KIDS EDUCATION ORGANIZATION$250
TURNAROUND INC$250
BRIGHT FOCUS - ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH$150

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $283k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.6M · 23 repeat orgs$169k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against -50% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.6M

$168k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%

-50%

Still filing today

39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEnvironmentCivil RightsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CA
COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE NETWORK
5× · 2021–2025 · $279k · revenue +50%
CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION
5× · 2021–2025 · $3k · revenue +1%
FC
FRANCISCAN CENTER
5× · 2021–2025 · $2k · revenue +172%

Funded once

YG
YMCA GOODNOW (FUNDED THROUGH COMMUNITY PROGRAM CENTERS LLC)
one grant, 2022 · $36k
UO
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION - SHRIVER PEACEWORKER PROGRAM
one grant, 2021 · $33k
YC
YMCA COLLEGE (FUNDED THROUGH COMMUNITY PROGRAM CENTERS LLC)
one grant, 2022 · $31k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Baltimore Outreach Services Inc

Baltimore Outreach Services, Inc. is a 24-hour, 7 day per week shelter for women and their children, providing wrap around case management services and assistance with moving them to independent housing.

Human Services

Economic Alliance of Greater Baltimore

—

Somebody Cares Baltimore Inc

The mission of Somebody Cares Baltimore is to connect people to opportunities to serve their community, and connect organizations to work together.

Religion

Baltimore Museum of Art

The baltimore museum of art connects art to baltimore and baltimore to the world, (see sch. o) embodying a commitment to artistic excellence and social equity in every decision from art presentation, interpretation, and collecting, to the…

Arts & Culture

Maryland-Delaware-Dc Press

Education

Cash Campaign of Maryland Inc

The cash campaign of maryland promotes economic advancement for low-to-moderate income individuals and families in baltimore and across maryland. cash accomplishes its mission through operating a portfolio of direct service programs,…

Human Services

City of Refuge Baltimore Inc

Through supportive services fueled by innovation and a collective impact approach, city of refuge baltimore seeks to lead individuals and families on a journey to self-sufficiency for generations to come. we do that by focusing on five key…

Human Services

Community Mediation Program Inc

To provide free mediation services in the baltimore metropolitan area for the purposes of reducing interpersonal and community violence. the program also provides community education and conflict resolution training.

Human Services

Manna House Inc

To offer assistance and support to the homeless, poor and needy of baltimore with services contributing toward their independence and stability.

—

Baltimore Wedding Initiative Inc

—

Baltimore Corps Inc

To enlist talent to accelerate social innovation in baltimore and advance a citywide agenda for equity and racial justice.

Employment

Civil Justice Inc

Civil justice is a non-profit organization dedicated to expanding legal services for low and moderate-income marylanders facing life-altering legal issues, using innovative solutions that create positive change.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Helping Up Mission Inc and the most unlike its peers is Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

11/11

Grantees still filing

9/11

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,496,286Human Services$283,084Environment$2,500Civil Rights$1,000Arts & Culture$750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The John J Leidy Foundation IncMD16× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The John J Leidy Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · The Abell Foundation Inc · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation MORTON & SOPHIA MACHT FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: HELPING ORPHANS PROSPER EVERYWHERE INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~0 months of operating runway; revenue held over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 043851212 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on HELPING ORPHANS PROSPER EVERYWHERE INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 0 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue held over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 2% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Morton & Sophia Macht Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Morton & Sophia Macht Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

MORTON & SOPHIA MACHT FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Morton & Sophia Macht Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

MORTON & SOPHIA MACHT FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Morton & Sophia Macht Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph