Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Mortimer and Mimi Levitt Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
91
Grants FY2024still arriving
35
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Arts & Culture$8.5MRecreation & Sports$1.1MCommunity Improvement$807kHuman Services$357kEnvironment$350kHousing & Shelter$266kEducation$95kPhilanthropy$67kOther$0
02FY2024 · 91 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k27 grants · $82k
  • $10k–50k55 grants · $1.3M
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $1.0M
  • $250k+2 grants · $500k
$25,000
Median grant
35
States reached
$199M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF LEVITT PAVILION DENVER$250,000
FRIENDS OF LEVITT PAVILION DAYTON$250,000
FRIENDS OF LEVITT PAVILION CITY OF ANGELS$238,000
FRIENDS OF LEVITT PAVILION ARLINGTON$225,000
FRIENDS OF LEVITT SHELL SIOUX FALLS$200,000
FRIENDS OF LEVITT PAVILION STEELSTACKS$200,000
IMAGINE LOS ANGELES INC$65,000
FRIENDS OF LEVITT PAVILION SAN JOSE$60,000
MY FRIEND'S PLACE$50,000
INTERNATIONAL LATINO CULTURAL CENTER$40,000
LOWNDES-VALDOSTA ARTS COMMISSION INC$35,000
CATAMOUNT FILM & ARTS CO$35,000
BREWERY ARTS CENTER$30,000
CREATE PORTAGE COUNTY INC$30,000
HANA ARTS$30,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $377k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE POTTER'S HOUSE FAMILY SERVICE CENTER: $25k → 22%BLINKNOW FOUNDATION: $25k → 4%COWAN COMMUNITY ACTION GROUP INC: $30k → 29%VISION SOLDOTNA: $25k → 11%COWAN COMMUNITY ACTION GROUP INC: $30k → 29%VOLUNTEER COLLECTIVE: $250 → 14%VISION SOLDOTNA: $25k → 11%COWAN COMMUNITY ACTION GROUP INC: $20k → 29%COWAN COMMUNITY ACTION GROUP INC: $15k → 29%THE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION: $300 → 14%COWAN COMMUNITY ACTION GROUP INC: $9k → 29%VOLUNTEER COLLECTIVE: $200 → 14%COWAN COMMUNITY ACTION GROUP INC: $8k → 29%IMAGINE LOS ANGELES INC: $57k → 14%Cowan Community Action Group Inc: $5k → 29%IMAGINE LOS ANGELES INC: $14k → 14%Vision Soldotna: $5k → 11%IMAGINE LOS ANGELES INC: $4k → 14%IMAGINE LOS ANGELES INC: $65k → 14%BE AN ELF: $250 → 14%SCOPE: $4k → 14%BE AN ELF: $150 → 14%PATH: $500 → 14%PATH: $250 → 14%ONE VOICE: $500 → 14%PETS ARE WONDERFUL SUPPORTLOS ANGELES: $10k → 14%VOLUNTEER COLLECTIVE: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
VT
NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$11M · 80 repeat orgs$614k to everyone else

80 repeat relationships — 55 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

80
65

Total granted

$11M
$252k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+36%

Still filing today

83%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $362k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEducationHuman ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MUSIC ARTS AND COMMUNITY LOS ANGELES
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +164% · 66% of their budget
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF LEVITT PAVILION DAYTON
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +156% · 32% of their budget
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF LEVITT SHELL SIOUX FALLS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +217% · 28% of their budget

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER MANAGER OF
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • AA
    AFRICAN AMERICAN CULTURAL COLLABORATIVE
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
  • PH
    POTTER'S HOUSE FAMILY SERVICE CENTEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +48%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Latino Theater Company

The latino theater company operates the los angeles theatre center, whose mission is to provide a world class arts center for those pursuing artistic excellence; a laboratory where both tradition and innovation are honored and honed; a…

Arts & Culture
2
The Bronx Council On the Arts Incorporated

A pioneering advocate for cultural equity, the bronx council on the arts nurtures the development of diverse artists and arts organizations and build strong cultural connections in and beyond the bronx.

Arts & Culture
3
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
4
Performance Space 122 Inc

See schedule operformance space new york is committed to promoting the arts (including performance, visual and all other contemporary arts), fostering artistic development (including through direct grants), advancing diversity in the field…

Arts & Culture
5
New York City Center Inc

The mission of new york city center is to be new york city's leading center for dance and musical theater. dedicated to making the arts accessible to the broadest possible audience, city center seeks to create a welcoming environment and…

Arts & Culture
6
District of Columbia Arts Center

The District of Columbia Arts Center serves the Washington DC area by presenting high caliber and challenging works. It encourages professionalism among artists by providing a forum for educational and cultural exchange. DCAC was founded…

Arts & Culture
7
The Arts Council Inc

The organizational mission is to support and advance the legacy of innovation in and access to the arts as a core community value, by providing grants and venues for artists and art organizations to practice and execute their art form in…

—
8
Los Angeles Performance Practice

As creative producers, we are devoted to the production and presentation of groundbreaking experiences in contemporary performance that use innovative approaches to collaboration, technology, and social engagement. As a service…

Arts & Culture
9
United States Artists Inc

To invest in america's finest artists and illuminate the value of artists to society.

Arts & Culture
10
(402) Arts Collective

Cultivating a vibrant network of artists who create community and impact culture.

Arts & Culture
11
Artists Space Inc

A contemporary art space that provides direct support to artists through exhibition opportunities, live commissions, and public programs. in recent years, the exhibition program has grown to present six major exhibitions per year…

Arts & Culture
12
Arts and Business Council of Greater Nashville Inc

Arts & business council of greater nashville supports and promotes the arts by driving collaboration between arts and business that contribute to the creativity, vitality, and prosperity of greater nashville/the regions/the city.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dance Downtown La Inc La Dance Project and the most unlike its peers is Ashland for Change Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Arts CentersCommunity FoundationsYouth Development ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Women & Girls Leadership De…Animal Rescue and ShelterEnvironmental Conservation …Food Banks and PantriesCancer Support ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Local Food System Organizat…Jewish Community Organizati…Health Access Advocacy and …Military Veterans SupportDance Arts OrganizationsPregnancy Support ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyIndependent K-12 SchoolsFaith-Based Social ServicesOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%14%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%28%5–10yr19%46%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr13%10%35–55yr16%3%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%2/154
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,411

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

143 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 143 of the 182 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

11
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
32
Early backer (in before they grew)
141/143
Grantees still filing
86/143
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MUSIC ARTS AND COMMUNITY LOS ANGELES — $2,008,256 · Arts & CultureMUSIC ARTS AND COMMUNITY LOS ANGELESFRIENDS OF LEVITT PAVILION DAYTON — $1,025,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF LEVITT PAVILION DAYTONFRIENDS OF LEVITT PAVILION DENVER — $975,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF LEVITT PAVILION DENVER+49 more — $1,640,000 · Arts & Culture+49 moreFRIENDS OF LEVITT PAVILION ARLINGTON — $1,045,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF LEVITT PAVILION ARLINGTO…FRIENDS OF LEVITT PAVILION STEELSTACKS — $925,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF LEVITT PAVILION STEELSTA…FRIENDS OF LEVITT SHELL MEMPHIS — $350,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF LEVITT SHELL MEMPHISMY FRIEND'S PLACE — $148,900 · Other+81 more — $1,166,105 · Other+81 moreFRIENDS OF LEVITT SHELL SIOUX FALLS — $1,024,957 · EducationFRIENDS OF …UTICA MONDAY NITE CORPORATION — $115,000 · EducationUTICA MONDA…CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION — $40,500 · Education+9 more — $32,600 · EducationEARLHAM CHICKS WITH CHECKS INC — $115,000 · Community ImprovementMAIN STREET FORT SMITH — $115,000 · Community ImprovementGALLUP MAINSTREET ARTS & CULTURAL DISTRICT — $85,000 · Community ImprovementHARRISONBURG DOWNTOWN RENAISSANCE — $61,500 · Community ImprovementMAIN STREET BATESVILLE — $61,500 · Community ImprovementON BROADWAY INC — $61,500 · Community ImprovementMOUNTAIN ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INC — $50,000 · Community ImprovementBLACK CULTURAL ZONE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $28,000 · Community Improvement+5 more — $11,000 · Community ImprovementImagine Los Angeles Inc — $139,200 · Human ServicesCOWAN COMMUNITY ACTION GROUP INC — $116,000 · Human ServicesVISION SOLDOTNA INC — $55,000 · Human ServicesBLINKNOW FOUNDATION A NJ NONPROFIT — $25,000 · Human ServicesPOTTER'S HOUSE FAMILY SERVICE CENTE — $25,000 · Human Services+7 more — $16,500 · Human ServicesWOONSOCKET NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $115,000 · Housing & ShelterOPERATION HOPE OF FAIRFIELD INC — $10,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more — $1,500 · Housing & ShelterTHE BLACK BELT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $66,500 · PhilanthropyLIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION — $45,500 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY CHEST OF ENGLEWOOD — $5,000 · Philanthropy+2 more — $650 · Philanthropy
Arts & Culture$5,648,256Other$3,635,005Education$1,213,057Community Improvement$588,500Human Services$376,700Housing & Shelter$126,500Philanthropy$117,650

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMUSIC ARTS AND COMMUNITY LOS ANGELES — $2,008,256 over 5y, 66% of budgetFRIENDS OF LEVITT PAVILION DAYTON — $1,025,000 over 5y, 32% of budgetFRIENDS OF LEVITT SHELL SIOUX FALLS — $1,024,957 over 5y, 28% of budgetFRIENDS OF LEVITT PAVILION DENVER — $975,000 over 5y, 32% of budgetFRIENDS OF LEVITT PAVILION SAN JOSE — $150,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetImagine Los Angeles Inc — $139,200 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetCatamount Film & Arts Company — $125,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetCOWAN COMMUNITY ACTION GROUP INC — $116,000 over 5y, 6.3% of budgetCREATE PORTAGE COUNTY INC — $115,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetBREWERY ARTS CENTER — $115,000 over 5y, 77% of budgetEARLHAM CHICKS WITH CHECKS INC — $115,000 over 5y, 33% of budgetDISCOVER DOWNTOWN MIDDLESBORO INC — $115,000 over 5y, 7.7% of budgetUTICA MONDAY NITE CORPORATION — $115,000 over 5y, 37% of budgetDowntown Springfield Heritage Foundation Inc — $115,000 over 5y, 18% of budgetWOONSOCKET NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $115,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetMAIN STREET FORT SMITH — $115,000 over 5y, 17% of budgetMARION CULTURAL ALLIANCE INC — $100,000 over 5y, 9.2% of budgetJOHN MICHAEL KOHLER ARTS CENTER INC — $95,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetGALLUP MAINSTREET ARTS & CULTURAL DISTRICT — $85,000 over 5y, 25% of budgetHANA ARTS INC — $71,500 over 3y, 7.4% of budgetLOWNDES-VALDOSTA ARTS COMMISSION I — $66,500 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetTHE BLACK BELT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $66,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHARRISONBURG DOWNTOWN RENAISSANCE — $61,500 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetCOLUSA COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL — $61,500 over 3y, 16% of budgetALLEGANY ARTS COUNCIL — $61,500 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetCITYFEST INC — $61,500 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetMAIN STREET BATESVILLE — $61,500 over 3y, 50% of budgetScissortail Productions Inc — $61,500 over 3y, 21% of budgetARTS & CULTURAL ALLIANCE OF ST LUCIE INC — $61,500 over 3y, 10% of budgetON BROADWAY INC — $61,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetFirst Friday Berea Inc — $60,000 over 2y, 53% of budgetVISION SOLDOTNA INC — $55,000 over 3y, 47% of budgetMOUNTAIN ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION — $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCREATIVE WACO — $46,500 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetLIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION — $45,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCATALYST CALIFORNIA — $42,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION — $40,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL LATINO CULTURAL CENTER OF CHICAGO — $40,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetLAKELAND CULTURAL ARTS CENTER — $31,500 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetFILM INDEPENDENT — $31,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRISE CHATTANOOGA — $30,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetTrenton Downtown Association Inc — $30,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetBLACK CULTURAL ZONE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $28,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBIG CAR MEDIA INC — $28,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBLINKNOW FOUNDATION A NJ NONPROFIT — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPOTTER'S HOUSE FAMILY SERVICE CENTE — $25,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MUSIC ARTS AND COMMUNITY LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF LEVITT PAVILION DAYTON ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF LEVITT SHELL SIOUX FALLS ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF LEVITT PAVILION DENVER ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF LEVITT PAVILION SAN JOSE ↗
  • Who funds Imagine Los Angeles Inc ↗
  • Who funds Catamount Film & Arts Company ↗
  • Who funds COWAN COMMUNITY ACTION GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds CREATE PORTAGE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds GALVA ARTS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds BREWERY ARTS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds EARLHAM CHICKS WITH CHECKS INC ↗
  • Who funds DISCOVER DOWNTOWN MIDDLESBORO INC ↗
  • Who funds UTICA MONDAY NITE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Downtown Springfield Heritage Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOONSOCKET NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MAIN STREET FORT SMITH ↗
  • Who funds MARION CULTURAL ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHN MICHAEL KOHLER ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GALLUP MAINSTREET ARTS & CULTURAL DISTRICT ↗
  • Who funds HANA ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds LOWNDES-VALDOSTA ARTS COMMISSION I ↗
  • Who funds THE BLACK BELT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HARRISONBURG DOWNTOWN RENAISSANCE ↗
  • Who funds COLUSA COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds ALLEGANY ARTS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds CITYFEST INC ↗
  • Who funds MAIN STREET BATESVILLE ↗
  • Who funds Scissortail Productions Inc ↗
  • Who funds ARTS & CULTURAL ALLIANCE OF ST LUCIE INC ↗
  • Who funds ON BROADWAY INC ↗
  • Who funds First Friday Berea Inc ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ralph M Parsons F…The Annenberg Foundat…The Ahmanson Foundati…Weingart FoundationLiberty Hill Foundati…The Rose Hills Founda…The Rosalinde and Art…Mid Atlantic Arts IncCalifornia Community …Johnny Carson Foundat…Jewish Community Foun…S Mark Taper Foundati…
The Ralph M Parsons FoundationCA31.7× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Rosalinde and Arthur Gilbert Foundation · Mid Atlantic Arts Inc · California Community Foundation · Johnny Carson Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · S Mark Taper Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mortimer and Mimi Levitt Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Allegany Arts Council — 37% of income from government
  • Trenton Downtown Association Inc — 33% of income from government
  • Catamount Film & Arts Company — 27% of income from government
  • Operation Hope of Fairfield Inc — 15% of income from government
  • Marion Cultural Alliance Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Cityfest Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Our House Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Bams Fest Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
44report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mortimer and Mimi Levitt Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Mortimer and Mimi Levitt Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 182 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines