Skip to content

· Private foundation

Monaghan Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$124k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$220kReligion$206kHealth$151kEnvironment$70kInternational$67kHuman Services$25kArts & Culture$16kPhilanthropy$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $82k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MARY'S ACADEMY$22,000
REGIS JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL$20,000
ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER CAMPAIGN ST JOHN VIANNEY SEMINARY$15,000
COLORADO OPEN LANDS$15,000
CHRIST THE KING ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
SAMARITAN HOUSE$5,000
ST JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$5,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY STUDENTS$5,000
ORDER OF MALTA$5,000
LABOURE SOCIETY$5,000
RISEN CHRIST CATHOLIC CHURCH$2,000
THE WOMEN'S LIBRARY ASSOCIATION$2,000
ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY$2,000
CHILD FUND INTERNATIONAL$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SAMARITAN HOUSECATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER: $5k → 12%SAMARITAN HOUSECATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER: $5k → 12%SAMARITAN HOUSECATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER: $5k → 12%SAMARITAN HOUSECATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of Monaghan Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 84% of the giving stays in CO; by stated purpose, 73%.

Monaghan Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$901k · 30 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
7

Total granted

$901k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+993%

Still filing today

30%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentHealthInternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    COLORADO OPEN LANDS
    8× · 2017–2025 · $84k · revenue +215%
  • CI
    CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $69k · revenue +3%
  • OO
    Order of Malta Clinic of Northern California
    8× · 2018–2025 · $41k · revenue +246%

Funded once

  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH HOSPITAL CARDIAC CAMPAIGN
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • CF
    CATHOLIC FOUNDATION ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • SF
    ST FRANCIS OF ASSISI FRIARY
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Loma Linda University

Loma linda university, a seventh-day adventist christian health sciences institution, seeks to further the healing and teaching ministry of jesus christ "to make man whole" by: - educating ethical and proficient christian health…

Education
2
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
3
La Roche University

La roche university advances learning informed by ethical and service-oriented values, reflecting its catholic heritage and the charism of the sisters of divine providence.

Education
4
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
5
Our Lady of the Lake University of San Antonio

As a catholic university sponsored by the sisters of divine providence, our lady of the lake university is a community whose members are committed to serve students by: (continued on schedule o).

Education
6
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
7
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
8
Claremont Lincoln University

Delivers affordable, accessible, and relevant higher education programs.

Education
9
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
10
Mount Mary University Inc

Mount mary university, an urban catholic university for women sponsored by the school sisters of notre dame, provides an environment for the development of the whole person. the university encourages leadership, integrity, and a deep sense…

—
11
Loma Linda University Shared Services Inc

To participate in christ's ministry of health, healing, and wholeness for: education, healthcare, and research by providing support to the lluh entities.

—
12
University of Dayton

The university of dayton is a top-tier independent, catholic research educational institution founded in 1850. the primary exempt purpose is providing post secondary education through undergraduate, graduate, doctoral and continuing…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities & Community Serv of the Archdiocese of Denver; the most unlike its peers is Order of Malta Clinic of Northern California. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MARY'S ACADEMY: $122,000 · OtherST MARY'S ACADEMYST JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $110,000 · OtherST JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONREGIS JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $79,500 · OtherREGIS JESUIT HIGH SCHOOLMISSIONARY SISTERS OF THE SACRED HEART: $50,000 · OtherMISSIONARY SISTERS OF THE SACRED HEARTARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER CAMPAIGN ST JOHN VIANNEY SEMINARY: $50,000 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER CAMPAIGN ST JOHN VIANNEY SEMINARYARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER CAMPAIGNTHE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN COLORADO: $35,000 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER CAMPAIGNTHE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN COLORADOCHRIST THE KING ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH: $31,000 · OtherFELLOWSHIP OF CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY STUDENTS: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $27,500 · Other+18 more: $116,500 · Other+18 moreCOLORADO OPEN LANDS: $84,000 · EnvironmentCOLORADO O…+1 more: $1,000 · EnvironmentCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $69,000 · InternationalUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $41,000 · EducationST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $8,000 · EducationLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · EducationOrder of Malta Clinic of Northern California: $41,450 · Health+1 more: $250 · HealthCATHOLIC CHARITIES & COMMUNITY SERV OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE LABOURE SOCIETY INC: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$651,500Environment$85,000International$69,000Education$51,000Health$41,700Human Services$20,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOLORADO OPEN LANDS: $84,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $69,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOrder of Malta Clinic of Northern California: $41,450 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $41,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES & COMMUNITY SERV OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROUNDUP RIDERS OF THE ROCKIES HERITAGE AND TRAILS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetTHE LABOURE SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $8,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO WATER TRUST: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLORADO OPEN LANDS ↗
  • Who funds CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA ↗
  • Who funds Order of Malta Clinic of Northern California ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES & COMMUNITY SERV OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER ↗
  • Who funds ROUNDUP RIDERS OF THE ROCKIES HERITAGE AND TRAILS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE LABOURE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO WATER TRUST ↗
  • Who funds GoochlandCares ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Catholic Foundation No ColoradoCO13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Catholic Foundation No Colorado · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Monaghan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Monaghan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Monaghan Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Monaghan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Monaghan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph