Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Monaghan Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$144k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$220kReligion$206kHealth$151kEnvironment$70kInternational$67kHuman Services$25kArts & Culture$16kPhilanthropy$16kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $100k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER CAMPAIGN ST JOHN VIANNEY SEMINARY$25,000
ST MARY'S ACADEMY$20,000
REGIS JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL$20,000
COLORADO OPEN LANDS$15,000
MOTHER CABRINI SHRINE$10,000
CHRIST THE KING ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH$10,000
Individual grant recipient$7,500
ORDER OF MALTA$6,000
ST JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$5,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY STUDENTS$5,000
LABOURE SOCIETY$5,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES SAMARITAN HOUSE$5,000
CHILD FUND INTERNATIONAL$2,000
ROUNDUP RIDERS OF THE ROCKIES HERITAGE & TRAILS FOUNDATION$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF DENVER$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–21, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SAMARITAN HOUSECATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER: $5k → 12%SAMARITAN HOUSECATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER: $5k → 12%SAMARITAN HOUSECATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER: $5k → 12%SAMARITAN HOUSECATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 11% of Monaghan Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 84% of the giving stays in CO; read by stated purpose it is 73% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Monaghan Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$772k · 29 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
7

Total granted

$772k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+993%

Still filing today

28%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationEnvironmentHealthInternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    COLORADO OPEN LANDS
    7× · 2017–2024 · $69k · revenue +215%
  • CI
    CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $67k · revenue +3%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF DENVER
    6× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • CF
    CATHOLIC FOUNDATION ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH HOSPITAL CARDIAC CAMPAIGN
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • SF
    ST FRANCIS OF ASSISI FRIARY
    one grant, 2018 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
2
Loma Linda University

Loma linda university, a seventh-day adventist christian health sciences institution, seeks to further the healing and teaching ministry of jesus christ "to make man whole" by: - educating ethical and proficient christian health…

Education
3
La Roche University

La roche university advances learning informed by ethical and service-oriented values, reflecting its catholic heritage and the charism of the sisters of divine providence.

Education
4
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
5
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
6
Claremont Lincoln University

Delivers affordable, accessible, and relevant higher education programs.

Education
7
Our Lady of the Lake University of San Antonio

As a catholic university sponsored by the sisters of divine providence, our lady of the lake university is a community whose members are committed to serve students by: (continued on schedule o).

Education
8
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
9
University of La Verne

The university of la verne offers a distinctive and relevant educational experience to a diverse population of traditional-age, adult, and graduate learners, preparing them for successful careers and a commitment to lifelong learning…

Education
10
Loma Linda University Shared Services Inc

To participate in christ's ministry of health, healing, and wholeness for: education, healthcare, and research by providing support to the lluh entities.

11
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…

Science & Tech
12
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities & Community Serv of the Archdiocese of Denver and the most unlike its peers is Order of Malta Clinic of Northern California. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $105,000 · OtherST JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONST MARY'S ACADEMY — $100,000 · OtherST MARY'S ACADEMYREGIS JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL — $59,500 · OtherREGIS JESUIT HIGH SCHOOLMISSIONARY SISTERS OF THE SACRED HEART — $50,000 · OtherMISSIONARY SISTERS OF THE SACRED HEARTARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER CAMPAIGN ST JOHN VIANNEY SEMINARY — $35,000 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER CAMPAIGN ST JOHN VIANNEY SEMINARYARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER CAMPAIGNTHE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN COLORADO — $35,000 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER CAMPAIGNTHE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN COLORADOFELLOWSHIP OF CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY STUDENTS — $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $22,500 · OtherCHRIST THE KING ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH — $21,000 · Other+18 more — $104,500 · Other+18 moreCOLORADO OPEN LANDS — $69,000 · EnvironmentCOLORADO …+1 more — $1,000 · EnvironmentCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA — $67,000 · InternationalCHILDFUND…UNIVERSITY OF DENVER — $40,000 · EducationST LOUIS UNIVERSITY — $6,000 · EducationLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY — $2,000 · EducationOrder of Malta Clinic of Northern California — $36,450 · Health+1 more — $250 · HealthCATHOLIC CHARITIES & COMMUNITY SERV OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER — $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE LABOURE SOCIETY INC — $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$557,500Environment$70,000International$67,000Education$48,000Health$36,700Human Services$20,000Philanthropy$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOLORADO OPEN LANDS — $69,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA — $67,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER — $40,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOrder of Malta Clinic of Northern California — $36,450 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES & COMMUNITY SERV OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROUNDUP RIDERS OF THE ROCKIES HERITAGE AND TRAILS FOUNDATION — $9,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY — $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LABOURE SOCIETY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO WATER TRUST — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLORADO OPEN LANDS
  • Who funds CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER
  • Who funds Order of Malta Clinic of Northern California
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES & COMMUNITY SERV OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER
  • Who funds ROUNDUP RIDERS OF THE ROCKIES HERITAGE AND TRAILS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds THE LABOURE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds COLORADO WATER TRUST
  • Who funds GoochlandCares

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Catholic Foundation No ColoradoCO13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Catholic Foundation No Colorado · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Monaghan Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Monaghan Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Monaghan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph