Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

ModivCare Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$58k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.

Health$254kHousing & Shelter$181kFood & Nutrition$169kPublic Safety & Disaster$56kHuman Services$44kYouth Development$23kCommunity Improvement$17kEducation$16kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$1,195
Median grant
10
States reached
$65k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Colorado Coalition for the Homeless$25,000
Leukemia & Lymphoma Society Denver Visionaries of the Year$7,500
Monroe Harding$7,500
Jake's Place$5,000
Compass to Care$5,000
Envision You$2,500
HIS House Childrens Home$1,500
Shriners Hospitals for Children$1,195
Heart Hand Outreach Ministries$1,000
Applewood Centers Inc$750
Asian Mental Health Collective$500
Alzheimer's Association$330
Habitat for Humanity International$290
Wounded Warrior Project$250
ASPCA$120
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $81k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Boston Chinatown Neighborhood Center Inc: $5k → 16%Travelers Aid Society of Philadelphia: $1k → 22%Homeless Period Project Inc: $2k → 10%Wounded Warrior Project: $250 → 14%Lost N Found Youth Inc: $2k → 13%Helping Heroes Colorado: $1k → 7%Houses for Warriors Inc: $4k → 7%Access Opportunity: $5k → 12%Good Works Farm: $1k → 6%BOGG MINISTRIES: $10k → 14%The Oasis Haven for Women & Children Inc: $5k → 12%ACT NOW FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%Buffalo Urban League Inc: $500 → 13%Atlanta Union Mission Corporation Hcsr: $2k → 13%Down Syndrome Network of West Virginia: $500 → 18%Warriors for Freedom Foundation: $3k → 16%American Red Cross: $15k → 14%HEIGHTENED INDEPENDENCE AND PROGRESS INC: $2k → 7%American Red Cross: $10k → 14%American Red Cross: $5k → 14%American Red Cross: $5k → 14%Mountain Empire Older Citizens: $2k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
KY
WV
VA
MD
TN
SC
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$377k · 10 repeat orgs$442k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
105

Total granted

$377k
$422k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+14%

Still filing today

80%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureFood & NutritionEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES
    2× · 2022–2023 · $150k · revenue +17%
  • CT
    COMPASS TO CARE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $25k · revenue +15%
  • OV
    OUR VIEW
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION - PEDIATRIC MENTAL HEALTH
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +62%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    one grant, 2023 · $35k · revenue +22%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Coalition for the Homeless

The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…

Human Services
2
Authoracare Collective

Authoracare collective empowers people to be active participants in their care journey, enabling them to live on their own terms through personalized support for mind, body, and spirit.

Human Services
3
Center for Improving Value in Health Care

To equip partners and communities in colorado and across the nation with the resources, services and unbiased data needed to improve health and health care. we help communities, organizations and individuals identify opportunities to…

Health
4
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
5
Abilities Network Inc

Cultivating inclusive communities through relationships, innovation and high-quality services.

Health
6
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
7
Health Care for the Homeless Inc

Health care for the homeless works to end homelessness through racially equitable health care, housing and advocacy in partnership with those of us who have experienced it.

—
8
The Asian Americans for Community Involvement of Santa Clara County Inc

To strengthen the resilience and hope of our diverse community members by improving their health and well-being.

Health
9
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
10
Marrakech Inc

Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…

Employment
11
Copa Health Inc

Copa health is a nonprofit organization that provides exceptional healthcare services, guided by its six core values: people first, compassion, integrity, perseverance, accountability, and innovation. they offer integrated healthcare,…

Health
12
Neighborhealth Corporation

Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Union Mission Corporation and the most unlike its peers is P H S Choral Parents Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Cancer Support ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Community Food PantriesIndependent K-12 SchoolsMilitary Veterans SupportFaith-Based Social ServicesDomestic Violence ServicesElementary Literacy TutoringAffordable Housing Construc…Local Food System Organizat…Developmental Disabilities …Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Policy Research and AdvocacyAnimal Rescue and ShelterSenior Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsFood Banks and Pantries
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%9%<5yr15%9%5–10yr21%21%10–20yr17%18%20–35yr12%23%35–55yr13%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%3%<5yr15%2%5–10yr21%15%10–20yr17%8%20–35yr12%47%35–55yr13%25%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/101
the rest of the field
13%
4,367/33,316

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

91 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 91 of the 126 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
90/91
Grantees still filing
63/91
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COLORADO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS — $175,000 · OtherCOLORADO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESSCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION - PEDIATRIC MENTAL HEALTH — $100,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION - PEDIATRIC MENTAL HEALTHAMERICAN RED CROSS — $20,000 · Other+72 more — $162,834 · Other+72 moreFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $150,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF THE ROC…+2 more — $1,500 · Food & NutritionTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'…COMPASS TO CARE — $25,000 · HealthCOMPASS TO CA…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $7,600 · HealthAMERICAN CANC…American Diabetes Association — $5,000 · Health+13 more — $13,025 · Health+13 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $35,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Na…BOGG MINISTRIES INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesBOGG MINIST…ACCESS OPPORTUNITY — $5,000 · Human ServicesACCESS OPPO…OASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesOASIS - A H…BOSTON CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesBOSTON CHIN…Houses for Warriors — $3,500 · Human Services+14 more — $18,250 · Human Services+14 moreCOLORADO NONPROFIT ASSOCIATION — $10,000 · Community ImprovementPROJECT ANGEL HEART — $5,000 · Community ImprovementGROW HEALTHY KIDS INC — $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOLIN F KENNEDY FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentSHINE IN DARKNESS FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentKATIES SOLES — $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentREACH OUT AND READ COLORADO — $1,000 · Youth Development+1 more — $300 · Youth DevelopmentRose Community Foundation — $10,000 · PhilanthropyMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $1,000 · PhilanthropyThe Hadnott Foundation Inc co Danielle Hadnott — $500 · Philanthropy
Other$457,834Food & Nutrition$151,500Health$100,625Human Services$81,750Community Improvement$15,000Youth Development$11,800Philanthropy$11,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $150,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASS TO CARE — $25,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetOUR VIEW — $10,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetRose Community Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA FOUNDATION FOR HOME CARE AND HOSPICE — $10,000 over 1y, 62% of budgetBOGG MINISTRIES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCOLORADO NONPROFIT ASSOCIATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $7,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONROE HARDING INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBRING SMILES TO SENIORS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE HUNGRY PROJECT — $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetACCESS OPPORTUNITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOSTON CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGILBERT ALBERT COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetGREATER LYNN SENIOR SERVICES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT ANGEL HEART — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLS — $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChinese for Affirmative Action — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIS HOUSE INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHouses for Warriors — $3,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetGROW HEALTHY KIDS INC — $3,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCOLIN F KENNEDY FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetEnvision You — $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS COLORADO — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHINE IN DARKNESS FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWARRIORS FOR FREEDOM — $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBOSTON NORTH CANCER ASSOCIATION — $2,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLost-N-Found Youth Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNTAIN EMPIRE OLDER CITIZENS INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKATIES SOLES — $2,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetAPPLEWOOD CENTERS INC — $1,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetACT NOW FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOUR RESCUE — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEIGHTENED INDEPENDENCE AND PROGRESS INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HOMELESS PERIOD PROJECT INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $1,195 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - CHICAGO — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORK OPTIONS FOR WOMEN DBA WORK OPTIONS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRAVELERS AID SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSERVING SENIORS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rose Community Founda…Colorado Gives Founda…Assurant FoundationWilliam G McGowan Cha…The Janus Henderson F…Daniels FundThe Denver FoundationCarmax FoundationCharity Bridge FundEnterprise Holdings F…Td Charitable Foundat…The Allstate Foundati…
Rose Community FoundationCO15.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rose Community Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Assurant Foundation · William G McGowan Charitable Fund · The Janus Henderson Foundation · Daniels Fund · The Denver Foundation · Carmax Foundation · Charity Bridge Fund · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation · The Allstate Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization ModivCare Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 18%
  • His House Inc — 75% of income from government
  • Hopes Community Action Partnership — 47% of income from government
  • Boston Chinatown Neighborhood Center Inc — 38% of income from government
  • Inspirica Inc — 30% of income from government
  • Heightened Independence and Progress Inc — 30% of income from government
  • Citizens Inn Inc — 18% of income from government
  • Care Dimensions Inc — 14% of income from government
  • Act Now Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
  • New Concepts for Living Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
25report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 126 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines