· Public charity
Mobile Health Clinics Association
To promote and serve the mobile healthcare sector through advocacy of the benefits of delivering health care using mobile platforms, education, and research in order to increase access to care for all.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 19 grants below total $191,130 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $216,387 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $25,257 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $79k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $113k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LA CLINICA DE LOS CAMPESINOS INC | $12,500 |
| OHIO HEALTH FOUNDATION INC | $12,500 |
| BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE | $12,500 |
| PROJECT VISION HAWAII | $12,500 |
| COMMUNITY HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF SPOKANE | $12,500 |
| THE PALMETTO PLACE | $12,500 |
| THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY | $12,500 |
| HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE PEDIATRIC MOBILE HEALTH | $12,500 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA | $12,500 |
| FORT DEFIANCE INDIAN HOSPITAL BOARD | $8,000 |
| VANDALIA HEALTH NETWORK | $8,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA | $8,000 |
| CORNELL SCOTT HILL HEALTH CORPORATION | $8,000 |
| HEALTHCARE EDUCATION RESEARCH AND INNOVATION FOUNDATION | $8,000 |
| LAHAI HEALTH | $8,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 40% of Mobile Health Clinics Association’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $88k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TFTHE FORT DEFIANCE INDIAN HOSPITAL BOARD INCORPORATION2× · 2022–2024 · $33k
- WVWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC2× · 2022–2024 · $28k · revenue -31%
- LCLA CLINICA DE LOS CAMPESINOS INC2× · 2023–2024 · $25k · revenue -14%
Funded once
- CHCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $33k · revenue +6%
- SUSTATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTONone grant, 2022 · $25k
- POPANCARE OF FLORIDA INCone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +18%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.
Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…
Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time. vision we, the novant health team, will deliver the most remarkable patient experience, in every dimension, every time. values -compassion: we…
To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
To partner with individuals and families so they can thrive and lead healthier lives by delivering the comprehensive, integrated, and equitable primary healthcare that matters most to them.
To deliver the highest value patient experience through quality, safety, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness, enhanced by medical education and research in collaboration with Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).
To provide culturally sensitive, coordinated primary care services emphasizing education, prevention, and advocacy, regardless of one's ability to pay.
Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.
The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.
Kapi'olani medical specialists (dba hawai'i pacific health medical group) is a multispecialty provider group dedicated to providing world-class care for adults and children across hawai'i and the pacific region working in partnership with…
To be a successful physician led, professionally managed medical practice that benefits our patients and our community, while supporting the UT Health Science Center's mission through clinical excellence, financial responsibility and a…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids Doc On Wheels and the most unlike its peers is The Palmetto Palace. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Yale University ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LA CLINICA DE LOS CAMPESINOS INC ↗
- Who funds THE PALMETTO PALACE ↗
- Who funds PANCARE OF FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds MOBILE CARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Community Health Association of Spokane ↗
- Who funds PROJECT VISION HAWAII ↗
- Who funds DURHAM TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds Texas Children's Hospital ↗
- Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
- Who funds CHEROKEE HEALTH SYSTEMS ↗
- Who funds INTERCAMBIOS PUERTO RICO INC ↗
- Who funds HENNEPIN HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PREMIER MOBILE HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds KIDS DOC ON WHEELS ↗
- Who funds NEAR VISION INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds HEALTHCARE EDUCATION RESEARCH AND INNOVATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
- Who funds EVANGELICAL COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds BETHESDA COMMUNITY CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds CORNELL SCOTT-HILL HEALTH CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds PLAN A HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds THE TOOTH TRUCK INC ↗
- Who funds BREAST CARE FOR WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds PROJECT RENEWAL INC ↗
- Who funds LAHAI HEALTH ↗
- Who funds EYE THRIVE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Direct Relief · Americares Foundation Inc · American Cancer Society Inc · American Heart Association Inc · Heart to Heart International Inc · Reach Out and Read Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mobile Health Clinics Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Pancare of Florida Inc — 15% of income from government
- Medical Teams International — 14% of income from government
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- Cornell Scott-Hill Health Corporation — 12% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Mobile Health Clinics Association?
Find your warmest path to Mobile Health Clinics Association through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.