· Public charity
Mission Hospital Regional Medical Center
As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $1,403,548 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,433,488 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $29,940 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k3 grants · $79k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $325k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CAMINO HEALTH CENTER | $1,000,000 |
| ORANGE COUNTY UNITED WAY | $175,000 |
| FAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES | $150,000 |
| ST JUDE NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTERS | $48,048 |
| FRIENDSHIP SHELTER INC | $18,000 |
| RSM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE | $12,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $500k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +85% since the first grant, against +64% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCAMINO HEALTH CENTER5× · 2017–2024 · $6.4M · revenue +69%
LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY CLINIC3× · 2018–2023 · $754k · revenue +162%- FSFRIENDSHIP SHELTER INC7× · 2017–2024 · $630k · revenue +215%
Funded once
Human Options Incgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +33%- NCNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM AND DRUG DEPENDENCE ORANGE COUNTY CALIFgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $88k · revenue +40%
- CLCOMMUNITY LEGAL AID SOCALgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $83k · revenue +96%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.
To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.
To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…
To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.
The primary exempt purpose of children's healthcare of california includes without limitation the receipt of distributions and grants for the making of distributions and grants to children's hospital of orange county (choc) and to…
Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.
To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.
We are servants who provide care and assistance to those in need and act as advocates for systemic change.
La clinica provides primary and preventive medical, dental, behavioral health, and other health promotion services to underserved and low-income patients.
To provide quality primary health care to people in need.
To provide access to affordable quality medical, dental, behavioral, and other health care services to all residents of southern california communities, especially vulnerable populations.
Our mission is to improve the health of our patients and the community and advocate the feminist goals of social, political, & economic equality.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Families Forward and the most unlike its peers is National Council On Alcoholism and Drug Dependence Orange County Calif. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ST JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CAMINO HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY CLINIC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDSHIP SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds ORANGE COUNTY'S UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LAGUNA BEACH ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds Illumination Health Home formerly The Illumination Foundation ↗
- Who funds Human Options Inc ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTERS ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM AND DRUG DEPENDENCE ORANGE COUNTY CALIF ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY LEGAL AID SOCAL ↗
- Who funds WELLNESS AND PREVENTION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Western Youth Services ↗
- Who funds WE ARE GROUNDSWELL ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds COALITION OF OC COMMUNITY CLINICS ↗
- Who funds CHOC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH INITIATIVE OF OC ↗
- Who funds UNIDOS South OC Inc ↗
- Who funds LAGUNA BEACH SENIORS INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILIES FORWARD ↗
- Who funds SOUTH COUNTY OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds CREER COMMUNIDAD Y FAMILIA ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH HOME CARE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds RSM Chamber of Commerce ↗
- Who funds TALLER SAN JOSE HOPE BUILDERS ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds LAGUNA ART MUSEUM ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Orange County's United Way · Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian · Sisters of St Joseph Healthcare Foundation · Farmers & Merchants Bank Foundation · Oneoc · Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · O L Halsell Foundation · Weingart Foundation · St Joseph Health System Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Macgillivray Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mission Hospital Regional Medical Center funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.