Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mill-Rose Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$22kEducation$22kPhilanthropy$9kHuman Services$7kHealth$6kRecreation & Sports$3kArts & Culture$2kEnvironment$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$800
Median grant
2
States reached
$12k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTERN RESERVE HISTORICAL SOCIETY$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
KIRTLAND HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC DEPARTMENT$800
SUB ZERO MISSION$742
UNITED WAY$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 62% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EMMAUS COMMUNITY OF PITTSBURGH: $100 → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 14%SUB ZERO MISSION: $742 → 9%EMMAUS COMMUNITY OF PITTSBURGH: $50 → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $965 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
IL
NY
OH
PA
CO
MD
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$67k · 23 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +71% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
21

Total granted

$67k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
0%

Still filing today

17%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyRecreation & SportsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SI
    ST IGNATIUS HIGH SCHOOL OF CLEVELAND
    3× · 2017–2019 · $19k
  • AF
    ABMA FOUNDATION
    5× · 2018–2022 · $7k
  • SR
    ST ROSE OF LIMA CHURCH
    3× · 2017–2019 · $7k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
2
University Circle Incorporated

University circle is one of the most extraordinary cultural districts in the world. within one square mile, it is home to world-class arts, educational, and medical institutions and public spaces that welcome millions of residents,…

Community Improvement
3
Akron Art Museum

To enrich lives through modern and contemporary art.

Arts & Culture
4
The Ohio Environmental Council

To protect the environment and health of all ohio communities through legal and policy advocacy, decision-maker accountability, and civic engagement.

Environment
5
Dunham Tavern Museum & Gardens

To preserve, develop, and share historic dunham tavern and its campus as an educational and cultural resource. we aspire for dunham tavern as an institution to provide an urban green space in midtown cleveland, and to return the tavern to…

Arts & Culture
6
Ohio History Connection

Identify, authenticate, collect, preserve, and interpret ohio's history.

Arts & Culture
7
America's River Roots Experience

America's river roots' mission is a quest to forge deeper connections to america's inland river waterways, aiming to highlight the pivotal role the ohio river played in shaping our nation. sparked by america's 250th anniversary, this…

Arts & Culture
8
The City Club of Cleveland

The city club of cleveland's mission is to create conversations of consequence that help democracy thrive. we do this in pursuit of our vision of strong, informed individuals and communities that prize freedom of speech and civil, civic…

Education
9
West Creek Conservancy

Our mission is to enrich the lives of all people in northeast ohio by conserving natural habitats, restoring the ecological value of our region's lands and waters, and expanding opportunities to connect people from all cultures to…

Environment
10
United Way of Summit and Medina

United way of summit & medina works to transform our community to make it easier for people to get help and build fulfilling, healthy lives.

Philanthropy
11
Lake Erie Nature and Science Center

Lake erie nature & science center educates and inspires each of us to understand, appreciate, and take responsibility for our natural world. serving more than 100,000 people each year with animal exhibits and programs, planetarium shows,…

Arts & Culture
12
Museum of Contemporary Art Cleveland

Moca's mission- art now, in progress - embodies our nature as a living, adaptive platform for artistic experimentation, public exchange, and civic connection. our vision - artists & art lead us to the unfamiliar, where we open and connect…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Lake County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dance Stop Boosters Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
6/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST IGNATIUS HIGH SCHOOL OF CLEVELAND: $19,300 · OtherST IGNATIUS HIGH SCHOOL OF CLEVELANDABMA FOUNDATION: $7,000 · OtherABMA FOUNDATIONST ROSE OF LIMA CHURCH: $6,800 · OtherST ROSE OF LIMA CHURCHLAKE COUNTY YMCA: $5,000 · OtherLAKE COUNTY YMCACATHOLIC DIOCESE OF CLEVELAND: $3,800 · OtherCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF CLEVELANDIndividual grant recipient: $2,500 · Other+28 more: $23,705 · Other+28 moreAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $4,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 · Health+1 more: $160 · HealthCATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION: $965 · Human ServicesTHE SUB ZERO MISSION: $742 · Human ServicesEMMAUS COMMUNITY OF PITTSBURGH INC: $150 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 · Human ServicesWESTERN RESERVE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1,000 · Arts & CultureCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART: $750 · Arts & CultureUNITED WAY OF LAKE COUNTY INC: $1,200 · PhilanthropyPOCONO MOUNTAINS UNITED WAY: $100 · PhilanthropyDance Stop Boosters Club Inc: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE HOLDEN ARBORETUM: $1,000 · Environment
Other$68,105Health$5,160Human Services$1,957Arts & Culture$1,750Philanthropy$1,300Recreation & Sports$1,000Environment$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF LAKE COUNTY INC: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN RESERVE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDance Stop Boosters Club Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE HOLDEN ARBORETUM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION: $965 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SUB ZERO MISSION: $742 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetECUMENICAL SHELTER NETWORK OF LAKE COUNTY INC: $375 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KIRTLAND COUNTRY CLUB SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEMMAUS COMMUNITY OF PITTSBURGH INC: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOCONO MOUNTAINS UNITED WAY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF LAKE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN RESERVE HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Dance Stop Boosters Club Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE HOLDEN ARBORETUM ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds THE SUB ZERO MISSION ↗
  • Who funds ECUMENICAL SHELTER NETWORK OF LAKE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE KIRTLAND COUNTRY CLUB SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA11.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mill-Rose Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mill-Rose Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mill-Rose Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Mill-Rose Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mill-Rose’s filings →

More from the funding graph