Skip to content
Mental Health and Addiction Network Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Mental Health and Addiction Network Inc

We work with not-for-profit organizations focused on mental health, addiction and intellectual disability to help them increase their participation and success in public-sector workplace charitable fund drives.

$88k
Granted FY2022
7
Grants FY2022
4
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Health$585kCrime & Legal$21k
02FY2022 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $59,154, the rows itemized in this filing. The $87,755 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $28,601 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k4 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $34k
$8,632
Median grant
4
States reached
$65k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOUNDATION FOR COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH$13,110
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH$11,013
ACTIVE MINDS INC$10,238
THE ASPERGER-AUTISM NETWORK INC$8,632
INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR CLUBHOUSE DEVELOPMENT INC$6,043
JUDGE DAVID L BAZELON CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH LAW$5,116
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR BIPOLAR DISORDERS INC$5,002
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FAMILIES FOR DEPRESSION AWARENESS: $9k → 8%FAMILIES FOR DEPRESSION AWARENESS: $7k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$592k · 13 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2022, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
1

Total granted

$592k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+106%

Still filing today

85%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
HealthSocial SciencePhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    Foundation for Cognitive Therapy and Research
    6× · 2017–2022 · $130k · revenue +133%
  • AF
    ASSOCIATION FOR AUTISM AND NEURODIVERSITY INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $82k · revenue +160%
  • NC
    NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
    6× · 2017–2022 · $77k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • AS
    AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ADDICTION MEDICINEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +106%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
2
American Psychiatric Association

The american psychiatric association (apa) was incorporated in 2000 as a 501(c)(6) trade association. its 38,000 u.s. and international physician members specialize in the diagnosis and treatment of mental health and disorders, including…

Community Improvement
3
Rise Above the Disorder

Rise Above The Disorder is a non-profit centered on making mental health care accessible and affordable to everyone. Our cause was founded in 2012 as a team of volunteers helping people find local therapists and crowd-funding the cost of…

Health
4
National Alliance for Research On Schizophrenia and Depression

National alliance for research on schizophrenia and depression (narsad) d/b/a the brain & behavior research foundation is committed to alleviating the suffering of mental illness by awarding grants that will lead to advances and…

—
5
National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors

The National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD) is organized to reflect and advocate for the collective interest of state mental health authorities and their directors at the national level. NASMHPD analyzes…

Health
6
National Alliance On Mental Illness of Massachusetts Inc

We seek to improve the quality of life for people living with mental health conditions, their families, and their caregivers. we work to ensure that all people impacted by a mental health condition receive the support they need when they…

Health
7
Anxiety and Depression Association of America

To promote the prevention, treatment, and cure of anxiety, depression, ocd, ptsd, and related disorders and to improve the lives of all people who suffer from them through education, practice, and research.

Health
8
The American Psychoanalytic Association Inc

The purpose of the association to study and advance psychoanalysis; to advocate and maintain standards for the training of psychoanalysts and for the practice of psychoanalysis; to foster the integration of psychoanalysis with other…

—
9
Inseparable Inc

Inseparable Inc is focused on creating a world where mental health is treated as a critical and equal piece of overall health, and where systems are designed with their impact on mental health in mind. Inseparable, Inc. is a growing…

Health
10
National Alliance On Mental Illness of New York City Inc

To help individuals and families affected by mental illness build better lives through education, support, and advocacy.

—
11
Michigan Assoc of Community Mental Health Boards

Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.

—
12
The American Neurological Association

Advancing science, education, and careers to improve neurologic health for all.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Association On Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities; the most unlike its peers is Juvenile Bipolar Research Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASSOCIATION FOR AUTISM AND NEURODIVERSITY INC: $81,727 · HealthASSOCIATION FOR AUTISM AND NEURODIVERSITY INCNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $76,842 · HealthNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTHActive Minds Inc: $75,210 · HealthActive Minds IncINTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR BIPOLAR DISORDERS: $37,735 · HealthINTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR BIPOLAR DISORDERSPARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTION: $21,390 · HealthPARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTIONAMERICAN MUSIC THERAPY ASSOCIATION: $12,576 · Health+2 more: $14,005 · HealthFoundation for Cognitive Therapy and Research: $129,844 · OtherFoundation for Cognitive Therapy …JUDGE DAVID L BAZELON CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH LAW: $21,047 · OtherJUDGE DAVID L BAZELON CENTER FOR …AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION: $16,948 · OtherAMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION …AMERICAN ASSOCIATION ON INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES: $12,067 · OtherAMERICAN ASSOCIATION ON INTELLECT…THE GLENDON ASSOCIATION: $53,088 · Social ScienceTHE GLEND…JUVENILE BIPOLAR RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $37,702 · PhilanthropyFamilies for Depression Awareness Inc: $16,113 · Human Services
Health$319,485Other$179,906Social Science$53,088Philanthropy$37,702Human Services$16,113

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFoundation for Cognitive Therapy and Research: $129,844 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR AUTISM AND NEURODIVERSITY INC: $81,727 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $76,842 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetActive Minds Inc: $75,210 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetTHE GLENDON ASSOCIATION: $53,088 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetINTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR BIPOLAR DISORDERS: $37,735 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetJUVENILE BIPOLAR RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $37,702 over 2y, 63% of budgetPARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTION: $21,390 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJUDGE DAVID L BAZELON CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH LAW: $21,047 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetFamilies for Depression Awareness Inc: $16,113 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetAMERICAN MUSIC THERAPY ASSOCIATION: $12,576 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION ON INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES: $12,067 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF ADDICTION MEDICINE: $7,962 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR CLUBHOUSE DEVELOPMENT INC: $6,043 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodMorgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Network for GoodDC7.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mental Health and Addiction Network Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mental Health and Addiction Network Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Association for Autism and Neurodiversity Inc: 24% of income from government
  • American Society of Addiction Medicine: 9% of income from government
  • Families for Depression Awareness Inc: 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mental Health and Addiction Network Inc?

Find your warmest path to Mental Health and Addiction Network Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mental Health and Addiction Network’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home