Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Melvin & Betty Fine Foundation Inc

To promote zionism, jewish education and the us - israel relationship

$140k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$78k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$605kHealth$67kArts & Culture$51kRecreation & Sports$47kEducation$33kHuman Services$25kInternational$17k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 6 grants below total $115,146 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $139,646 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $24,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $78k
$6,800
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BALTIMORE ZIONIST DISTRICT INC$78,246
BAT YAM$10,000
JEWISH MUSEUM OF MARYLAND$6,800
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$6,800
FRIENDS OF THE IDF$6,800
TEMPLE JUDEA$6,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JAFCO: $1k → 13%JEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $5k → 8%JEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $5k → 8%GREEN AGAIN FUND: $6k → 14%SHALOM TIKVAH: $3k → 11%SHALOM TIKVAH: $3k → 11%SHALOM TIKVAH: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$795k · 17 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
9

Total granted

$795k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+31%

Still filing today

76%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureRecreation & SportsEducationReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BZ
    BALTIMORE ZIONIST DISTRICT INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $452k · revenue +20% · 58% of their budget
  • TJ
    THE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL
    4× · 2017–2021 · $47k · revenue +58%
  • TC
    THE CAMP AIRY & CAMP LOUISE FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2018–2023 · $35k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • IL
    ISRAEL LACROSSE ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $12k · revenue +31%
  • GA
    GREEN AGAIN FUND INC
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
  • GF
    GBMC FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
3
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

4
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
5
The Jerusalem Connection
6
University of Judaism Foundation
7
National Jewish Health

National Jewish Health's mission since 1899 is to heal, discover and educate as a preeminent healthcare institution. We serve by providing the best integrated and innovative care for patients and their families; by understanding and…

Health
8
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
9
Greater Miami Hillel Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate and graduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

10
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
11
Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History

The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…

Arts & Culture
12
Sherit Isroel

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Museum of Maryland Inc and the most unlike its peers is Israel Lacrosse Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community FederationsYouth Sports Booster Organi…Community Health CentersCancer Support OrganizationsPublic University Foundatio…Hospice Care Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr16%4%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr11%39%35–55yr16%31%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr16%1%5–10yr19%1%10–20yr16%4%20–35yr11%78%35–55yr16%16%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
14%
5,903/41,823

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BALTIMORE ZIONIST DISTRICT INC — $451,589 · OtherBALTIMORE ZIONIST DISTRICT INCBETH AM SYNAGOGUE — $82,175 · OtherBETH AM SYNAGOGUETEMPLE BAT YAM — $49,125 · OtherTEMPLE BAT YAM+8 more — $47,200 · Other+8 moreTHE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL — $47,000 · HealthTHE JOHNS…Boca Raton Regional Hospital Inc — $12,000 · HealthBoca Rato…NATIONAL GAUCHER FOUNDATION INC — $4,500 · HealthNATIONAL …SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE INC — $3,250 · HealthGBMC FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 · HealthThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $31,500 · Arts & CultureJEWISH MUSEUM OF MARYLAND INC — $19,850 · Arts & CultureTHE CAMP AIRY & CAMP LOUISE FOUNDATION INC — $34,700 · Recreation & SportsISRAEL LACROSSE ASSOCIATION INC — $11,850 · Recreation & SportsJEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesShalom Tikvah Inc — $7,500 · Human ServicesGREEN AGAIN FUND INC — $5,925 · Human ServicesJewish Adoption and Foster Care Options Inc — $1,400 · Human ServicesFLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $9,000 · EducationUniversity of Maryland Medical System Foundation Inc — $2,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $6,800 · InternationalNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOVIET JEWRY — $2,000 · ReligionHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $1,400 · Religion
Other$630,089Health$69,750Arts & Culture$51,350Recreation & Sports$46,550Human Services$24,825Education$11,000International$6,800Religion$3,400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBALTIMORE ZIONIST DISTRICT INC — $451,589 over 8y, 58% of budgetTHE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL — $47,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CAMP AIRY & CAMP LOUISE FOUNDATION INC — $34,700 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $31,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH MUSEUM OF MARYLAND INC — $19,850 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetGILCHRIST HOSPICE CARE INC — $18,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc — $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL LACROSSE ASSOCIATION INC — $11,850 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE CONFERENCE OF PRESIDENTS OF MAJOR AMERICAN JEWISH ORGANIZATIONS FUND — $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetShalom Tikvah Inc — $7,500 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $6,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF BALTIMORE INC — $6,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN AGAIN FUND INC — $5,925 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetNATIONAL GAUCHER FOUNDATION INC — $4,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE INC — $3,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Maryland Medical System Foundation Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOVIET JEWRY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $1,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Adoption and Foster Care Options Inc — $1,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Associated Jewish Charities of BaltimoreMD17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Melvin & Betty Fine Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Jewish Community Center of Baltimore Inc2% of income from government
  • Jewish Museum of Maryland Inc2% of income from government
  • The Camp Airy & Camp Louise Foundation Inc0% of income from government
  • Sinai Hospital of Baltimore Inc0% of income from government
  • Gilchrist Hospice Care Inc0% of income from government
  • The Johns Hopkins Hospital0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Melvin & Betty Fine Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Melvin & Betty Fine Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph