Skip to content
Mdwise Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Mdwise Inc

To provide high-quality, affordable healthcare and improve the well-being of our members by engaging exceptional associates, community leaders and healthcare professionals.

$374k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$97k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.0MEducation$100kAnimals$53kEmployment$50kPublic Benefit$45kFood & Nutrition$39kArts & Culture$28kHuman Services$26kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $306,917, the rows itemized in this filing. The $374,146 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $67,229 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $46k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $233k
$18,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$666M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INDIANA FAMILY TO FAMILY$97,300
HEALTH & HOSPITAL CORP OF MARION COUNTY$86,000
MIDWEST URBAN STRATEGIES$50,000
INDIANAPOLIS ZOO$27,500
HEALTHY BIRTH DAY INC$18,000
FAMILY ENTERTAINMENT TELEVISION INC$7,000
NAMI INDIANA INC$6,000
GA FOOD SERVICES OF PINELLAS COUNTY LLC$5,117
UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC$5,000
HOOSIERS FOR OPPORTUNITY PROSPERITY AND$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $216k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TRANS SOLUTIONS RESEARCH AND RESEARCH: $10k → 16%TRANS SOLUTIONS RESEARCH AND RESOURCE: $10k → 16%TRANS SOLUTIONS RESEARCH AND RESOURCE: $10k → 16%DAMIEN CENTER INC: $15k → 16%DAMIEN CENTER INC: $8k → 16%COVERING KIDS AND FAMILIES OF INDIANA: $100k → 16%COVERING KIDS AND FAMILIES OF INDIANA: $55k → 16%COVERING KIDS & FAMILIES OF INDIANA INC: $8k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 17 repeat orgs$137k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
13

Total granted

$1.6M
$101k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+8%

Still filing today

76%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IF
    INDIANA FAMILY TO FAMILY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $381k · revenue +105%
  • IZ
    Indianapolis Zoological Society Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $80k · revenue +15%
  • MH
    MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IN INDIANA INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $47k · revenue +453%

Funded once

  • CC
    CHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2021 · $13k · revenue -9%
  • HM
    HEALTHVISIONS MIDWEST INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $11k · revenue +30%
  • WA
    WARREN ARTS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
2
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
3
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
4
Independent Insurance Agents of Indiana

To enhance the competitive position and fulfill business requirements of independent agents and brokers, advocating buyer interest, and continually striving to be the premier trade association.

—
5
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
6
Indiana University Health Bloomington Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
7
Healthlinc Incorporated

Coordinate health care information by providing a community-wide clinical data and information exchange to the health care community.

—
8
Indiana University Health Care Associates Inc

To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…

Health
9
Indiana University Health Jay Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
10
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
11
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
12
Indiana University Health Ball Memorial Physicians Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Indiana Primary Health Care Assoc Inc; the most unlike its peers is Warren Arts Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
17/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INDIANA FAMILY TO FAMILY: $381,000 · OtherINDIANA FAMILY TO FAMILYHEALTH AND HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $377,000 · OtherHEALTH AND HOSPITAL CORPORATIONSTATE OF INDIANA: $66,250 · OtherSTATE OF INDIANAMINORITY HEALTH COALITION OF MARION COUNTY: $48,265 · OtherGA FOOD SERVICE INC: $44,004 · Other+11 more: $80,630 · Other+11 moreCOVERING KIDS & FAMILIES OF INDIANA INC: $163,000 · Human ServicesCOVERING KIDS …COMMUNITY RESEARCH & RESOURCE CENT fka TransSolutions Rsrch & Res Ctr: $30,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY RESE…THE DAMIEN CENTER: $22,500 · Human ServicesTHE DAMIEN CEN…MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IN INDIANA INC: $47,000 · HealthMENTAL HE…SHALOM HEALTH CARE CENTER INC: $44,750 · HealthSHALOM HE…HEALTHY BIRTH DAY INC: $18,000 · HealthHEALTHY B…INDIANA PRIMARY HEALTH CARE ASSOC INC: $16,805 · HealthINDIANA P…Super Shot Inc: $6,329 · HealthEskenazi Health Foundation Inc: $6,000 · HealthMERIDIAN HEALTH SERVICES CORP: $5,700 · HealthMIDWEST URBAN STRATEGIES: $100,000 · EmploymentWarren Arts and Education Foundation Inc: $40,000 · EducationINDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · EducationIndiana University Foundation: $20,000 · EducationIndianapolis Zoological Society Inc: $80,000 · AnimalsUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $30,000 · PhilanthropyWARREN ARTS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureINDIANA LATINO EXPO: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$997,149Human Services$215,500Health$144,584Employment$100,000Education$100,000Animals$80,000Philanthropy$30,000Arts & Culture$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINDIANA FAMILY TO FAMILY: $381,000 over 6y, 13% of budgetCOVERING KIDS & FAMILIES OF INDIANA INC: $163,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetMIDWEST URBAN STRATEGIES: $100,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetIndianapolis Zoological Society Inc: $80,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IN INDIANA INC: $47,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSHALOM HEALTH CARE CENTER INC: $44,750 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWarren Arts and Education Foundation Inc: $40,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetINDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESEARCH & RESOURCE CENT fka TransSolutions Rsrch & Res Ctr: $30,000 over 3y, 35% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DAMIEN CENTER: $22,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetIndiana University Foundation: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA PRIMARY HEALTH CARE ASSOC INC: $16,805 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $13,200 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHEALTHVISIONS MIDWEST INC: $10,600 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWARREN ARTS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetINDIANA LATINO EXPO: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetSuper Shot Inc: $6,329 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNAMI INDIANA INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEskenazi Health Foundation Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINDIANA COUNCIL OF COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTERS INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMERIDIAN HEALTH SERVICES CORP: $5,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Indianapolis Foun…The Health Foundation…United Way of Central…Central Indiana Commu…Richard M Fairbanks F…Lumina Foundation for…Lilly Endowment IncJpmorgan Chase Founda…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Indianapolis Foundation IncIN23.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · The Health Foundation of Greater Indianapolis Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Richard M Fairbanks Foundation Inc · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mdwise Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mdwise Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mdwise’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home