· Private foundation
McLaughlin Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k5 grants · $130k
- $50k–250k14 grants · $1.4M
- $250k+4 grants · $1.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FIELDS AND FUTURES FOUNDATION | $675,000 |
| OKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $500,000 |
| PIVOT | $325,000 |
| BECAUSE WE CARE PHILANTHROPY INC | $299,000 |
| OKLAHOMA CENTER FOR NON PROFTS | $200,000 |
| CLEATS FOR KIDS | $200,000 |
| OKLAHOMA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION | $130,000 |
| CENTRAL OKLAHOMA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $125,000 |
| ANGELS FOSTER FAMILY NETWORK OKC | $100,000 |
| OKLAHOMA CITY POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE | $100,000 |
| HALO PROJECT | $100,000 |
| PARENT PROMISE | $90,000 |
| REMERGE | $75,000 |
| SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES | $75,000 |
| PALOMAR | $70,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
54 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 35 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $115k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
CLEATS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION7× · 2017–2024 · $638k · revenue +37%- UWUnited Way of Central Oklahoma Inc3× · 2019–2023 · $503k · revenue +8%
- ESEnid Sports Association2× · 2019–2020 · $500k · revenue +256%
Funded once
- VCVariety Care Incgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $500k · revenue +137%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2019 · $80k · revenue -121%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $55k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.
The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.
The oklahoma hall of fame preserves oklahomas unique history while promoting pride in our great state through each of its programs and the gaylord-pickens museum. the association honors our states rich tradition by telling oklahomas story…
To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.
The purpose of the organization is to provide hope-centered, trauma-informed, child-first services that unite law enforcement, child protective services (state and tribal), prosecutors, mental health professionals, and medical…
To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.
To provide a statewide voice for children by enhancing & sustaining the growth of local casa programs which provide trained community volunteers to represent the best interests of abused & neglected children.
Leadership oklahoma was organized to create, inspire, and support a dynamic network of leaders whose increased awareness and commitement to service will energize oklahomans to shape oklahoma's future.
To promote the self-sufficiency of the socially, economically, and culturally disadvantaged citizens of oklahoma and canadian counties and to eliminate the paradox of poverty among these citizens by opening to everyone the opportunity to…
The CARE Center exists to reduce trauma for child abuse victims and their families, coordinate a multidisciplinary approach to child abuse investigations, and provide free, effective child abuse prevention resources and education.
The mission of the oklahoma community service commission is to engage oklahomans of all ages and backgrounds in community-based service which supports americorps programs in oklahoma communities. services may include assisting with…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Potts Family Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
70 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 70 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA ↗
- Who funds FIELDS & FUTURES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BECAUSE WE CARE PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
- Who funds CLEATS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Enid Sports Association ↗
- Who funds Variety Care Inc ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds PIVOT INC ↗
- Who funds EXCHANGE CLUB CENTER FOR THE PREVENTION OF CHILD ABUSE OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
- Who funds REMERGE INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL OKLAHOMA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds ANGELS FOSTER FAMILY NETWORK OKC INC ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA CENTER FOR NONPROFITS INC ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HONESTLY INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST SERVE OKC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PALOMAR HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WES WELKER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KIPP OKC PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM CITY INC ↗
- Who funds TEEN EMPOWER INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION AT SAINT FRANCIS ↗
- Who funds SCISSORTAIL PARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds City Center Outreach Inc ↗
- Who funds Girl Scouts Western Oklahoma Inc ↗
- Who funds RESTOREOKC INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Inasmuch Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Love Meyer Family Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc · Sarkeys Foundation · The Merrick Foundation · Kirkpatrick Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc · Rainbolt Family Foundation · Fred Jones Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization McLaughlin Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Sunbeam Family Services Inc — 52% of income from government
- Oklahoma City Family Justice Center Inc — 14% of income from government
- Variety Care Inc — 9% of income from government
- Remerge Inc — 7% of income from government
- Pivot Inc — 2% of income from government
- Community Development Support Associatio — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to McLaughlin Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to McLaughlin Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.