Skip to content
McKenna Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

McKenna Foundation

MCKENNA FOUNDATION actively provides services to enhance the health and well-being of the greater new barunfels community, serving as a partner and resource to others who share our goals-now and for future generations.

$1.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
41
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$213k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$8.8MHuman Services$3.7MHousing & Shelter$1.8MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.4MFood & Nutrition$1.2MCrime & Legal$913kRecreation & Sports$633kEducation$348kOther$0
02FY2024 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $443k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.1M
$22,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$84M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MCKENNA HEALTH MANAGEMENT$212,606
NB HOUSING PARTNERS$120,000
HILL COUNTRY MHDD CENTERS$120,000
SALVATION ARMY OF COMAL COUNT$85,000
SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK$81,900
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS$75,000
CRRC OF CANYON LAKE$73,000
NEW BRAUNFELS YOUTH COLLAB$67,745
COMAL COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS$65,300
CONNECTIONS INDIVIDUAL & FAMI$65,000
NEW BRAUNFELS CHRISTIAN MINIS$65,000
RECOVERYWERKS$50,000
COMAL COUNTY FAMILY VIOLENCE$50,000
HELPING HANDS FOOD PANTRY$43,000
RIVER CITY ADVOCACY & COUNSEL$40,648
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SJRC: $450k → 7%ST JUDES RANCH FOR CHILDREN TEXAS REGION: $40k → 7%COMAL IDD CENTER: $300k → 10%1HOPE FOR KIDS: $15k → 16%1HOPE FOR KIDS: $10k → 16%SJRC: $20k → 7%PROJECT 1027 INC: $10k → 16%PROJECT 1027 INC: $8k → 16%SAN ANTONIO NONPROFIT COUNCIL: $29k → 16%SAN ANTONIO NONPROFIT COUNCIL: $28k → 16%SAN ANTONIO NONPROFIT COUNCIL: $18k → 16%THE NONPROFIT COUNCIL: $10k → 16%ANY BABY CAN: $70k → 10%ANY BABY CAN: $66k → 10%COMAL COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $65k → 10%ANY BABY CAN: $61k → 10%ANY BABY CAN: $60k → 10%ANY BABY CAN: $60k → 10%CHOSEN: $60k → 10%ANY BABY CAN: $55k → 10%ANY BABY CAN: $50k → 10%CHOSEN: $50k → 10%COMAL COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $50k → 10%COMAL COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $50k → 10%CHOSEN: $45k → 10%CHOSEN: $44k → 10%FAMILY LIFE CENTER OF NEW BRA: $40k → 10%FAMILY LIFE CENTER OF NEW BRA: $40k → 10%CHOSEN: $39k → 10%FAMILY LIFE CENTER OF NEW BRAUNFELS: $35k → 10%FAMILY LIFE CENTER OF NEW BRA: $35k → 10%FAMILY LIFE CENTER OF NEW BRAUNFELS: $35k → 10%FAMILY LIFE CENTER OF NEW BRAUNFELS: $35k → 10%COMAL COUNTY SENIOR CITIZEN'S FOUNDATION: $35k → 10%CHOSEN: $33k → 10%ANY BABY CAN: $31k → 10%COMAL COUNTY SENIOR CITIZEN'S FOUNDATION: $30k → 10%COMAL COUNTY SENIOR CITIZEN'S FOUNDATION: $30k → 10%FAMILY LIFE CENTER OF NEW BRAUNFELS: $25k → 10%CHOSEN: $25k → 10%FAMILY LIFE CENTER OF NEW BRAUNFELS: $25k → 10%HOPE HOSPICE: $20k → 10%HOPE HOSPICE: $20k → 10%HOPE HOSPICE: $20k → 10%ROCK HAUS FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%COMAL COUNTY SENIOR CITIZEN'S FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%NEW BRAUNFELS ANGELS: $15k → 10%CHOSEN: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of McKenna Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 92%.

McKenna Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$18M · 47 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

47 repeat relationships: 38 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
14

Total granted

$18M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+25%

Still filing today

91%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterEducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MCKENNA HEALTH MANAGEMENT
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3.1M · revenue +0% · 29% of their budget
  • CI
    CONNECTIONS INDIVIDUAL AND FAMILY SERVICES INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +38%
  • NB
    NEW BRAUNFELS CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • HC
    HIS CENTREgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $750k · revenue +29% · 45% of their budget
  • NB
    NEW BRAUNFELS PROFESSIONAL FIRE FIGHTERS CHARITIES ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $79k · revenue +117%
  • TF
    THE FOUNDATION OF THE BULVERDE AREA RURAL LIBRARY DISTRICT
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue -97%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
2
Guadalupe County Children's Advocacy Center

To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…

Crime & Legal
3
Bluebonnet Childrens Center

To protect and enhance the quality of life for abused and neglected children in Medina, Real and Uvalde Counties of Texas.

Crime & Legal
4
Behavioral Health Solutions of South Texas

To develop and implement effective age-appropriate, consumer-driven, evidence-based services to prevent and reduce substance use and strengthen mental wellness across the southernmost Texas communities.

Human Services
5
Texas Community Counseling

When care is within reach, lives change. Texas Community Counseling is a faith-based nonprofit committed to bringing hope and healing through mental health care to the communities that need it the most. We empower individuals to heal,…

Human Services
6
Novelty Behavioral Health

Our mission is to provide Accessible and Affordable Holistic-Based mental-health care to the communities we serve without without regard to their background or insurance status in a caring environment.

Health
7
Ft Bend County Child Advocates Inc

Fort Bend County Child Advocates, Inc. provides a voice, heals the hurt and breaks the cycle of abuse and neglect for children in Fort Bend County.

Civil Rights
8
Fredericksburg Community Health Center

The mission of the Good Samaritan Center is to provide a safe, Christ- Centered environment that gives our patients quality, coordinated and affordable healthcare.

Health
9
Casa of South Texas Inc

Child Advocacy

Human Services
10
Community Action Corporation of South Texas

To continuously improve the lives of South Texans by providing high quality health care, education, housing and economic opportunities to reduce poverty through services and partnerships.

Human Services
11
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Hidalgo Count

To provide services for the protection of abused and neglected children that are in the custody of the State of Texas.

Civil Rights
12
Comal County Child Welfare Board

Provide support to foster children and at risk families in Comal County Texas. Provide emergency support to victims of child abuse.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Brothers Big Sisters of South Texas Inc; the most unlike its peers is Spring Branch Tennis Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

9
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
23
Early backer (in before they grew)
51/51
Grantees still filing
44/51
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MCKENNA HEALTH MANAGEMENT: $3,086,633 · HealthMCKENNA HEALTH MANAGEMENTNEW BRAUNFELS CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $1,127,819 · HealthNEW BRAUNFELS CHRISTIAN MINISTRIESRIVER CITY ADVOCACY: $844,803 · HealthRIVER CITY ADVOCACYHIS CENTRE: $750,000 · HealthHIS CENTRERECOVERYWERKS: $679,325 · HealthRECOVERYWERKSFriends of Santa Rosa Foundation: $296,852 · Health+5 more: $167,500 · HealthHILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY MHMR CENTER: $1,300,242 · OtherHILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY MHMR CENTE…SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $944,690 · OtherSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANKTHE SALVATION ARMY: $796,578 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTL COMAL COUNTY: $438,281 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTL COMAL C…COMAL COUNTY FAMILY VIOLENCE SHELTER: $412,253 · OtherCOMAL COUNTY FAMILY VIOLENCE SHEL…CASA of Central Texas Inc: $347,015 · OtherCASA of Central Texas IncCANINE CLASSMATES: $250,672 · Other+24 more: $1,395,572 · Other+24 moreCONNECTIONS INDIVIDUAL AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $1,241,602 · Human ServicesCONNECTIONS INDIVIDUAL…SJRC TEXAS INC: $510,000 · Human ServicesSJRC TEXAS INCANY BABY CAN OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $452,000 · Human ServicesANY BABY CAN OF SAN AN…COMAL IDD: $315,000 · Human ServicesCOMAL IDDTHE ABBA FUND INC: $305,925 · Human ServicesTHE ABBA FUND INCCOMAL COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS FOUNDATION: $275,300 · Human ServicesCOMAL COUNTY SENIOR CI…FAMILY LIFE CENTER OF NEW BRAUNFELS: $270,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY LIFE CENTER OF …FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER NEW BRAUNFELS: $181,582 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION INC OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $143,000 · Human Services+5 more: $209,800 · Human Services+5 moreCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF SOUTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $982,776 · Community ImprovementNEW BRAUNFELS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $255,175 · Community ImprovementCRRC OF CANYON LAKE INC: $466,950 · Recreation & SportsBULVERDE SENIOR CENTER: $191,500 · Recreation & SportsKinetic Kids Inc: $66,000 · Recreation & SportsSPRING BRANCH TENNIS ASSOCIATION: $55,000 · Recreation & SportsNB HOUSING PARTNERS: $566,265 · Housing & ShelterTEXAS RAMP PROJECT: $70,000 · Housing & ShelterCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF COMAL COUN: $359,875 · Crime & Legal
Health$6,952,932Other$5,885,303Human Services$3,904,209Community Improvement$1,237,951Recreation & Sports$779,450Housing & Shelter$636,265Crime & Legal$359,875

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMCKENNA HEALTH MANAGEMENT: $3,086,633 over 8y, 29% of budgetCONNECTIONS INDIVIDUAL AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $1,241,602 over 7y, 7.9% of budgetNEW BRAUNFELS CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $1,127,819 over 8y, 12% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF SOUTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $982,776 over 8y, 9.7% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $944,690 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetRIVER CITY ADVOCACY: $844,803 over 7y, 20% of budgetHIS CENTRE: $750,000 over 1y, 45% of budgetRECOVERYWERKS: $679,325 over 8y, 63% of budgetNB HOUSING PARTNERS: $566,265 over 4y, 18% of budgetSJRC TEXAS INC: $510,000 over 3y, 7.3% of budgetCRRC OF CANYON LAKE INC: $466,950 over 7y, 12% of budgetANY BABY CAN OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $452,000 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTL COMAL COUNTY: $438,281 over 6y, 13% of budgetCOMAL COUNTY FAMILY VIOLENCE SHELTER: $412,253 over 7y, 4.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF COMAL COUN: $359,875 over 8y, 6.5% of budgetCASA of Central Texas Inc: $347,015 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetCOMAL IDD: $315,000 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetTHE ABBA FUND INC: $305,925 over 8y, 15% of budgetFriends of Santa Rosa Foundation: $296,852 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetCOMAL COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS FOUNDATION: $275,300 over 7y, 4.6% of budgetFAMILY LIFE CENTER OF NEW BRAUNFELS: $270,000 over 8y, 8.2% of budgetNEW BRAUNFELS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $255,175 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetCANINE CLASSMATES: $250,672 over 7y, 74% of budgetBULVERDE SENIOR CENTER: $191,500 over 8y, 6.4% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER NEW BRAUNFELS: $181,582 over 8y, 18% of budgetCENTRAL TEXAS ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER INC: $180,325 over 7y, 40% of budgetNew Braunfels Youth Collaborative: $167,745 over 2y, 28% of budgetSTEPS FOR LIFE: $166,351 over 8y, 31% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION INC OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $143,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH TEXAS INC: $125,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetBULVERDE FOOD PANTRY INC: $104,481 over 8y, 3.0% of budgetTHE NONPROFIT COUNCIL: $84,000 over 5y, 20% of budgetTEXAS RAMP PROJECT: $70,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetNEW BRAUNFELS 24 HOUR CLUB: $67,867 over 2y, 48% of budgetKinetic Kids Inc: $66,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetBELIEVE IT FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetHOPE HOSPICE: $60,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION OF THE BULVERDE AREA RURAL LIBRARY DISTRICT: $50,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetProject MEND: $42,500 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetACACIA MEDICAL MISSION: $37,500 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetCANYON LAKE FIREEMS: $32,086 over 2y, 44% of budget1HOPE FOR KIDS INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTRANSFORMATIONS BY AUSTIN ANGELS: $22,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetPROJECT 10 27 INC: $18,300 over 2y, 9.5% of budgetBULVERDE SPRING BRANCH PREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC: $17,500 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetTexas Suicide Prevention Collaborative: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetMID-TEXAS SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetBulverde Spring Branch Emergency Services: $9,875 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MCKENNA HEALTH MANAGEMENT ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTIONS INDIVIDUAL AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW BRAUNFELS CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF SOUTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds RIVER CITY ADVOCACY ↗
  • Who funds HIS CENTRE ↗
  • Who funds RECOVERYWERKS ↗
  • Who funds NB HOUSING PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds SJRC TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds CRRC OF CANYON LAKE INC ↗
  • Who funds ANY BABY CAN OF SAN ANTONIO INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTL COMAL COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds COMAL COUNTY FAMILY VIOLENCE SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF COMAL COUN ↗
  • Who funds CASA of Central Texas Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMAL IDD ↗
  • Who funds THE ABBA FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Santa Rosa Foundation ↗
  • Who funds COMAL COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY LIFE CENTER OF NEW BRAUNFELS ↗
  • Who funds NEW BRAUNFELS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CANINE CLASSMATES ↗
  • Who funds BULVERDE SENIOR CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER NEW BRAUNFELS ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL TEXAS ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds New Braunfels Youth Collaborative ↗
  • Who funds STEPS FOR LIFE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION INC OF CENTRAL TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds BULVERDE FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NONPROFIT COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds NEW BRAUNFELS PROFESSIONAL FIRE FIGHTERS CHARITIES ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS RAMP PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds NEW BRAUNFELS 24 HOUR CLUB ↗
  • Who funds Kinetic Kids Inc ↗
  • Who funds BELIEVE IT FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Gvtc Foundation I…New Braunfels Area Co…United Way of Comal C…San Antonio Area Foun…Harvey E Najim Charit…Veramendi Charitable …John L Santikos Chari…Carl C Anderson Sr an…St Luke's Lutheran He…Methodist Healthcare …San Antonio Food BankIngram Family Foundat…
The Gvtc Foundation IncTX59.9× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Gvtc Foundation Inc · New Braunfels Area Community Foundation · United Way of Comal County · San Antonio Area Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · Veramendi Charitable Foundation · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · St Luke's Lutheran Health Ministries Inc · Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas Inc · San Antonio Food Bank · Ingram Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization McKenna Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from McKenna Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on McKenna’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home