Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

McGlynn Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$820k
Granted FY2025still arriving
56
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$85k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Education$1.8MHealth$1.5MHuman Services$1.2MPhilanthropy$635kHousing & Shelter$591kReligion$438kPublic Safety & Disaster$182kFood & Nutrition$147kOther$0
02FY2025 · 56 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k27 grants · $96k
  • $10k–50k25 grants · $444k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $280k
$10,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$7.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MATTHEW'S HOUSE$85,000
HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION$75,000
MAYO CLINIC$70,000
BE THE MATCH FOUNDATION$50,000
ANNUNCIATION CHURCH AND SCHOOL$40,000
TUNNELS TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$34,000
GARY SINISE FOUNDATION$30,000
CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$26,000
COLORADO SEMINARY$25,000
CONNECTICUT COLLEGE$25,000
SHARING AND CARING HANDS$25,000
ST JUDE OF THE LAKE CATHOLIC SCHOOL$20,000
OUR LADY OF MERCY CHURCH$20,000
YELLOWSTONE CLUB COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$20,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $607k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WISHES & MORE: $5k → 7%MINNESOTA RECOVERY CONNECTION: $5k → 14%MISERICORDIA HOME: $5k → 14%MINNESOTA RECOVERY CONNECTION: $5k → 14%Greater Minneapolis Crisis Nursery: $22k → 11%LETTERS OF LOVE: $3k → 11%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF SAINT PAUL: $100k → 14%THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN AND CHILDREN: $50k → 10%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF SAINT PAUL: $80k → 14%THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN AND CHILDREN: $25k → 10%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF SAINT PAUL: $50k → 14%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF SAINT PAUL: $25k → 14%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF SAINT PAUL: $10k → 14%BREAKING FREE: $4k → 14%BREAKING FREE: $4k → 14%BREAKING FREE: $4k → 14%BREAKING FREE: $3k → 14%BREAKING FREE: $3k → 14%BREAKING FREE: $3k → 14%BREAKING FREE: $2k → 14%SHARING AND CARING HANDS: $25k → 11%SHARING AND CARING HANDS: $25k → 11%SHARING AND CARING HANDS: $25k → 11%SHARING AND CARING HANDS: $25k → 11%SHARING AND CARING HANDS: $25k → 11%SHARING AND CARING HANDS: $20k → 11%HAMMER RESIDENCES INC: $10k → 11%HAMMER RESIDENCES INC: $6k → 11%HAMMER RESIDENCES INC: $6k → 11%HAMMER RESIDENCES INC: $5k → 11%HAMMER RESIDENCES INC: $5k → 11%HAMMER RESIDENCES INC: $5k → 11%HAMMER RESIDENCES INC: $5k → 11%HAMMER RESIDENCES INC: $5k → 11%HAMMER RESIDENCES INC: $5k → 11%BRIGHTER DAYS GRIEF CENTER: $3k → 11%BRIGHTER DAYS GRIEF CENTER: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
IN
CT
CA
CO
KY
MD
TN
NC
DC
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.6M · 73 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

73 repeat relationships — 46 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

73
47

Total granted

$5.6M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+37%

Still filing today

66%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $93k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $562k · revenue +205%
  • HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $540k · revenue +24%
  • NF
    NMDP FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $427k · revenue +106%

Funded once

  • CO
    COLLEGE OF SAINT BENEDICT
    one grant, 2017 · $305k · revenue -5%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $200k
  • SC
    ST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $200k · revenue +6%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
2
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

—
6
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
7
Mitchell Hamline School of Law

Mitchell hamline school of law is an independent law school that advances its mission through a combination of legal education, public service, and community engagement. it is dedicated to preparing students to practice law, while also…

Education
8
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

—
9
Minneapolis College of Art and Design

Mcad provides a transformative education within a community of support for creative students of all backgrounds to work, collaborate, and lead with confidence in a dynamic, interconnected world.

Education
10
Minnesota Institute for Talented Youth

Mity's mission is to inspire and challenge intellectually curious students to pursue their passions within a diverse, inclusive community and empower them by building skills and relationships for lifelong success.

—
11
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
12
Minnesota State University Student Association Inc

Led by minnesota state university students, we are the inclusive voice for all future, current, and former students. we actively work to represent and support minnesota state university students and advocate at a campus, state, and federal…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Operation Open Arms Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsSenior Support ServicesVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Health Access Advocacy and …Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Military Veterans SupportFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Cancer Support ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity FoundationsEquine Therapy ProgramsAddiction Recovery ServicesFood Banks and PantriesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Environmental Conservation …Developmental Disabilities …Domestic Violence Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%2%<5yr12%3%5–10yr20%13%10–20yr17%31%20–35yr16%18%35–55yr18%32%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr20%5%10–20yr17%37%20–35yr16%11%35–55yr18%46%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/93
the rest of the field
10%
3,829/38,896

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

88 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 88 of the 131 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
87/88
Grantees still filing
61/88
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

STJOHN'S UNIVERSITY — $311,000 · OtherSTJOHN'S UNIVERSITYLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR — $213,000 · OtherLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POORIndividual grant recipient — $200,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMERICAN RED CROSS — $182,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSDE LA SALLE HIGH SCHOOL — $135,000 · OtherPERSPECTIVES INC — $125,000 · OtherCOLORADO SEMINARY — $125,000 · OtherCHAMPIONS FOR LEARNING — $125,000 · Other+73 more — $1,411,000 · Other+73 moreCOLLEGE OF SAINT BENEDICT — $305,000 · EducationCOLLEGE OF SAINT B…ST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY — $200,000 · EducationST CATHERINE UNIVE…CONNECTICUT COLLEGE — $190,000 · EducationCONNECTICUT COLLEG…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $143,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUN…CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $110,000 · EducationCHILDREN'S FOUNDAT…Breck School — $73,500 · EducationBreck SchoolUNIVERSITY OF DENVER — $50,000 · Education+6 more — $117,500 · Education+6 moreNMDP FOUNDATION — $427,000 · PhilanthropyNMDP FOUNDATIONGREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY — $227,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER TWIN CIT…GARY SINISE FOUNDATION — $107,000 · PhilanthropyGARY SINISE FOUN…YELLOWSTONE CLUB COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $100,000 · PhilanthropyYELLOWSTONE CLUB…The United Way of Lee County Inc — $77,000 · PhilanthropyThe United Way o…NAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC — $47,500 · Philanthropy+4 more — $47,000 · PhilanthropyHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION — $540,000 · HealthHAZELDEN BETT…MAYO CLINIC — $234,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICGILDA'S CLUB TWIN CITIES INC — $30,000 · Health+8 more — $50,000 · Health+8 moreLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF ST PAUL — $265,000 · Human ServicesLITTLE SI…SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC — $145,000 · Human ServicesSHARING A…THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC — $75,000 · Human ServicesTHE SHELT…Hammer Residences Inc — $51,500 · Human ServicesHammer Re…Breaking Free Inc — $23,000 · Human ServicesGREATER MINNEAPOLIS CRISIS NURSERY — $21,802 · Human Services+6 more — $31,000 · Human ServicesST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC — $561,500 · Housing & ShelterST MATTHE…SHELTER INC — $20,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more — $2,500 · Housing & ShelterFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC — $129,000 · International
Other$2,827,000Education$1,189,000Philanthropy$1,032,500Health$854,000Human Services$612,302Housing & Shelter$584,000International$129,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC — $561,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION — $540,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNMDP FOUNDATION — $427,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetCOLLEGE OF SAINT BENEDICT — $305,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF ST PAUL — $265,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $234,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY — $227,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY — $200,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONNECTICUT COLLEGE — $190,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC — $145,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $143,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC — $129,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPERSPECTIVES INC — $125,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetCHILDREN'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $110,000 over 4y, 6.3% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION — $107,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetYELLOWSTONE CLUB COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetThe United Way of Lee County Inc — $77,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC — $75,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBreck School — $73,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTEAMWOMENMN — $56,000 over 5y, 5.2% of budgetNAMI MINNESOTA — $52,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetHammer Residences Inc — $51,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMACPHAIL CENTER FOR MUSIC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC — $47,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAnimal Humane Society — $42,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSOMERSET COUNTRY CLUB — $34,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetPROVIDENCE ACADEMY — $34,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMINNEHAHA ACADEMY — $34,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT SUCCESS — $33,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetOperation Second Chance Inc — $30,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetGILDA'S CLUB TWIN CITIES INC — $30,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetFORMAN SCHOOL INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Lift Garage — $25,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetThe Junior League of Saint Paul Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetAMERICAN CAMPING ASSOCIATION INC — $24,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBreaking Free Inc — $23,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S UNIVERSITY — $22,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER MINNEAPOLIS CRISIS NURSERY — $21,802 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $21,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTER INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOCA GRANDE WOMAN'S CLUB INC — $20,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWomen's Foundation of Minnesota — $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetOPERATION OPEN ARMS INC — $15,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetUNICEF USA Impact Fund for Children Inc — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL WAGR SYNDROME ASSOCIATION — $15,000 over 3y, 9.0% of budgetTHOMAS E SMITH FOUNDATION INC — $12,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NMDP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF SAINT BENEDICT ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF ST PAUL ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds ST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds PERSPECTIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YELLOWSTONE CLUB COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The United Way of Lee County Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds Breck School ↗
  • Who funds TEAMWOMENMN ↗
  • Who funds NAMI MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds Hammer Residences Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER ↗
  • Who funds MACPHAIL CENTER FOR MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds NAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saint Paul & Minnesot…The Minneapolis Found…Mightycause Charitabl…The Richard M Schulze…Xcel Energy FoundationMargaret a Cargill Fo…United Way WorldwideCatholic Community Fo…Otto Bremer TrustMithun Family Foundat…Richard G Jacobus Fam…Fr Bigelow Foundation
Saint Paul & Minnesota FoundationMN34.8× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Margaret a Cargill Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Catholic Community Foundation of Minnesota · Otto Bremer Trust · Mithun Family Foundation · Richard G Jacobus Family Foundation · Fr Bigelow Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization McGlynn Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • South Shore Peer Recovery Inc — 71% of income from government
  • The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc — 2% of income from government
  • The United Way of Lee County Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Connecticut College — 0% of income from government
  • Trinity College — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to McGlynn Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to McGlynn Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 131 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines