Skip to content

· Private foundation

McClure Charitable Fdn of 2007

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$129k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$324kHousing & Shelter$215kRecreation & Sports$43kYouth Development$42kFood & Nutrition$30kPhilanthropy$23kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kHealth$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $115k
$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SAN ANTONIO INC$25,000
FRIENDS OF CHRISTUS SANTA ROAS FOUNATION$25,000
ACTS MISSIONS$20,000
ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN ANTONIO$15,000
SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES$15,000
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$15,000
CANDLELIGHT RANCH FOUNDATION$5,000
ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN ANTONIO$3,000
FOOD FOR THE POOR INC$2,000
UNIVERSITY of TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE$2,000
HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES$1,000
HEALY MURPHY CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $5k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 10%FOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $5k → 13%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $15k → 8%MERCY CORPS: $6k → 12%ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN ANTONIO: $15k → 16%FOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $5k → 13%ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN ANTONIO: $5k → 16%FOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $5k → 13%ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN ANTONIO: $5k → 16%ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN ANTONIO: $5k → 16%ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN ANTONIO: $5k → 16%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $25k → 16%ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN ANTONIO: $5k → 16%SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $5k → 16%IMPACT SAN ANTONIO FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%IMPACT SAN ANTONIO FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%IMPACT SAN ANTONIO FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%UNIVERSITY of TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE: $5k → 16%HEALY MURPHY CENTER: $5k → 16%HEALY MURPHY CENTER: $5k → 16%HEALY MURPHY CENTER: $5k → 16%HEALY MURPHY CENTER: $5k → 16%HEALY MURPHY CENTER: $5k → 16%HEALY MURPHY SUPPORT INC: $5k → 16%HEALY MURPHY CENTER: $5k → 16%FRIENDS OF CHRISTUS SANTA ROAS FOUNATION: $25k → 16%FRIENDS OF CHRISTUS SANTA ROAS FOUNATION: $25k → 16%SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $25k → 16%ACTS MISSIONS: $20k → 16%SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $20k → 16%SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $20k → 16%ACTS MISSIONS: $20k → 16%SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $20k → 16%SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $20k → 16%ACTS MISSIONS: $20k → 16%ACTS MISSIONS: $20k → 16%SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $20k → 16%SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $20k → 16%ACTS MISSIONS: $20k → 16%ACTS MISSIONS: $20k → 16%ACTS MISSIONS: $20k → 16%ACTS MISSIONS: $20k → 16%SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $20k → 16%ACTS MISSIONS: $20k → 16%SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $15k → 16%FRIENDS OF CHRISTUS SANTA ROAS FOUNATION: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$683k · 13 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +80% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
7

Total granted

$683k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+1%

Still filing today

69%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $180k · revenue +120%
  • CR
    CANDLELIGHT RANCH FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $43k · revenue +115%
  • HC
    HEALY-MURPHY CENTER
    8× · 2017–2025 · $36k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue +1%
  • MC
    Mercy Corps
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue -28%
  • HS
    HEALY-MURPHY SUPPORT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +99%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Antonio Medical Foundation

The mission of the san antonio medical foundation is to improvehealth care, advance biomedical science, and enhance communitywell-being by providing leadership & active stewardship of our landand other assets.

Health
2
Greater Satx

The mission of greater:satx is to lead the developemnt and diversification of san antonio regional economy through the recruitment and expansion of qualify employers and job producing investments.

—
3
San Antonio Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Inc

The mission of the san antonio hispanic chamber of commerce is to advocate in building a better san antonio through the growth and prosperity of hispanic, small minority, women-owned businesses, and hispanic professional and trade…

—
4
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
5
San Antonio Hospital Foundation Inc

To develop the resources to support san antonio regional hospital's mission to improve the health and wellbeing of the people we serve.

Health
6
Sa Talent Inc Sa Works

The mission of sa talent, inc. is to educate and develop youth and adults into the talent needs of san antonio's current and future employers and provide services for the regional employers for the retention and growth of their local…

Education
7
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
8
San Antonio Christian School

Partner with families to provide students a christ-centered education while fostering a life of faith and service. the school desires to associate with like-minded teachers, administrators, staff, parents, and students to communicate the…

—
9
San Angelo Area Foundation

The mission of the san angelo area foundation is to build a legacy of philanthropy by attracting and prudently managing endowed gifts in order to match donor interest with community needs of the area.

Philanthropy
10
Asante

Asante exists to provide quality healthcare services in a compassionate manner, valued by the communities we serve.

Health
11
Austin Habitat for Humanity Inc

Through faith in action, austin habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
12
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Antonio Area Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Candlelight Ranch Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $180,000 · OtherSAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INCACTS MISSIONS: $180,000 · OtherACTS MISSIONSFRIENDS OF CHRISTUS SANTA ROAS FOUNATION: $90,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF CHRISTUS SANTA ROAS FOUNATIONARCHDIOCESE OF SAN ANTONIO: $52,000 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF SAN ANTONIO+8 more: $45,000 · Other+8 moreCANDLELIGHT RANCH FOUNDATION: $42,500 · Recreation & SportsHEALY-MURPHY CENTER: $36,000 · EducationHEALY-MURPHY SUPPORT INC: $5,000 · EducationHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $35,000 · Housing & ShelterFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $22,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,500 · InternationalMercy Corps: $5,500 · InternationalIMPACT SAN ANTONIO FOUNDATION INC: $17,500 · PhilanthropySAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $6,000 · Youth Development
Other$547,000Recreation & Sports$42,500Education$41,000Housing & Shelter$35,000International$33,000Philanthropy$22,500Youth Development$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $180,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCANDLELIGHT RANCH FOUNDATION: $42,500 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetHEALY-MURPHY CENTER: $36,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $35,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $22,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACT SAN ANTONIO FOUNDATION INC: $17,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Corps: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALY-MURPHY SUPPORT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetSAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSA CANCER COUNCIL: $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CANDLELIGHT RANCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEALY-MURPHY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SAN ANTONIO INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT SAN ANTONIO FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
  • Who funds HEALY-MURPHY SUPPORT INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SA CANCER COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area FoundationTX17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Charitable Foundation Frost F0359600 · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization McClure Charitable Fdn of 2007 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from McClure Charitable Fdn of 2007. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on McClure Charitable Fdn of 2007’s filings →

More from the funding graph