· Private foundation
McClure Charitable Fdn of 2007
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $115k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FRIENDS OF CHRISTUS SANTA ROAS FOUNATION | $25,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SAN ANTONIO INC | $25,000 |
| ACTS MISSIONS | $20,000 |
| SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES | $15,000 |
| CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES | $15,000 |
| ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN ANTONIO | $15,000 |
| CANDLELIGHT RANCH FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN ANTONIO | $3,000 |
| UNIVERSITY of TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE | $2,000 |
| FOOD FOR THE POOR INC | $2,000 |
| HEALY MURPHY CENTER | $1,000 |
| HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 97% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +80% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SASAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC9× · 2017–2025 · $180k · revenue +87%
- CRCANDLELIGHT RANCH FOUNDATION9× · 2017–2025 · $43k · revenue +115%
- HCHEALY-MURPHY CENTER8× · 2017–2025 · $36k · revenue +89%
Funded once
- MCMercy Corpsone grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue -28%
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCone grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue +1%- HSHEALY-MURPHY SUPPORT INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +99%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the san antonio medical foundation is to improvehealth care, advance biomedical science, and enhance communitywell-being by providing leadership & active stewardship of our landand other assets.
The mission of greater:satx is to lead the developemnt and diversification of san antonio regional economy through the recruitment and expansion of qualify employers and job producing investments.
The mission of the san antonio hispanic chamber of commerce is to advocate in building a better san antonio through the growth and prosperity of hispanic, small minority, women-owned businesses, and hispanic professional and trade…
The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…
To develop the resources to support san antonio regional hospital's mission to improve the health and wellbeing of the people we serve.
The mission of sa talent, inc. is to educate and develop youth and adults into the talent needs of san antonio's current and future employers and provide services for the regional employers for the retention and growth of their local…
To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.
Partner with families to provide students a christ-centered education while fostering a life of faith and service. the school desires to associate with like-minded teachers, administrators, staff, parents, and students to communicate the…
The mission of the san angelo area foundation is to build a legacy of philanthropy by attracting and prudently managing endowed gifts in order to match donor interest with community needs of the area.
Asante exists to provide quality healthcare services in a compassionate manner, valued by the communities we serve.
Through faith in action, austin habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.
The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Antonio Area Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Candlelight Ranch Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds CANDLELIGHT RANCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HEALY-MURPHY CENTER ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SAN ANTONIO INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
- Who funds IMPACT SAN ANTONIO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES ↗
- Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HEALY-MURPHY SUPPORT INC ↗
- Who funds SA CANCER COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Charitable Foundation Frost F0359600 · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization McClure Charitable Fdn of 2007 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
- Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.