Skip to content
Maureen & Mark Rossi Charitable Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Maureen & Mark Rossi Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$86k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$63k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.1MHousing & Shelter$45kInternational$13kHuman Services$11kHealth$6kFood & Nutrition$6kPhilanthropy$4kReligion$2k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $63k
$600
Median grant
7
States reached
$241k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST VINCENT COLLEGE$63,000
INNER-CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND$12,000
CHAMPIONS FOR QUALITY EDUCATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,600
ONE ACRE FUND$2,591
Individual grant recipient$600
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR$200
FRIENDS OF CORPUS CHRISTI HOLY ROSARY$100
SISTERS OF SAINT BENEDICT$100
AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND$100
LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 11%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $200 → 14%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 11%CARVER CENTER: $1k → 9%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $200 → 14%CARVER CENTER: $1k → 9%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $100 → 11%PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER: $500 → 9%PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER: $500 → 9%PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER: $500 → 9%PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER: $250 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MD
AZ
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 17 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
24

Total granted

$1.1M
$78k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+21%

Still filing today

59%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthInternationalPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SV
    SAINT VINCENT COLLEGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $566k · revenue +19%
  • SARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $78k · revenue +14%
  • OA
    ONE ACRE FUND
    2× · 2018–2025 · $13k · revenue +168%

Funded once

  • BH
    BLESSED HOME PROJECT
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • ST
    SAINT THOMAS UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • US
    URSULINE SCHOOL OF NEW ROCHELLE
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
3
Association of Catholic Colleges and University

The association of catholic colleges and universities, founded in 1899, serves as the collective voice of u.s catholic higher education. through programs and services, the association strengthens and promptes the catholic identity and…

—
4
St Francis College

St. francis college is an independent, coeducational institution of higher education chartered by an act of the regents of the university of the state of new york on april 10, 1957.

Education
5
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
6
La Roche University

La roche university advances learning informed by ethical and service-oriented values, reflecting its catholic heritage and the charism of the sisters of divine providence.

Education
7
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
9
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
11
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
St John's University New York

St. john's university is a catholic, vincentian, metropolitan, and global institution of higher education (continued on schedule o).

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Little Sisters of the Assumption Family Health Service Inc; the most unlike its peers is Catholic Men's Fellowship of Phoenix Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/22
Grantees still filing
11/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAINT VINCENT COLLEGE: $566,435 · EducationSAINT VINCENT COLLEGESARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE: $77,500 · EducationSARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE+3 more: $2,640 · EducationINNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $364,400 · OtherINNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INCCHAMPIONS FOR QUALITY EDUCATION: $52,800 · OtherCHAMPIONS FOR QUALITY EDUCATIONBLESSED HOME PROJECT: $25,000 · OtherKellogg FinNet Inc: $22,500 · Other+25 more: $57,806 · Other+25 moreLIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $20,100 · Human ServicesPORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC: $3,750 · Human Services+1 more: $400 · Human ServicesONE ACRE FUND: $12,591 · InternationalSwim Across America Inc: $3,500 · PhilanthropyTOURETTE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC: $1,000 · HealthCANCER BRIDGES: $1,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $150 · HealthHORIZONS NATIONAL STUDENT ENRICHMENT PROGRAM INC: $1,043 · Youth DevelopmentGIVING TREE GLOBAL INC: $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Education$646,575Other$522,506Human Services$24,250International$12,591Philanthropy$3,500Health$2,150Youth Development$1,043Food & Nutrition$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAINT VINCENT COLLEGE: $566,435 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetINNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $364,400 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetSARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE: $77,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKellogg FinNet Inc: $22,500 over 4y, 7.9% of budgetLIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $20,100 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetONE ACRE FUND: $12,591 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC GUARDIAN SERVICES: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC: $3,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSwim Across America Inc: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE ASSUMPTION FAMILY HEALTH SERVICE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAVE MARIA UNIVERSITY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHORIZONS NATIONAL STUDENT ENRICHMENT PROGRAM INC: $1,043 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOURETTE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIVING TREE GLOBAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCATHOLIC MEN'S FELLOWSHIP OF PHOENIX INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCANCER BRIDGES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF CORPUS CHRISTI ROSARY SCHOOL TRUST: $900 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLazarex Cancer Foundation: $540 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAINT VINCENT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds INNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Kellogg FinNet Inc ↗
  • Who funds LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ONE ACRE FUND ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC GUARDIAN SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Swim Across America Inc ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE ASSUMPTION FAMILY HEALTH SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds AVE MARIA UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds HORIZONS NATIONAL STUDENT ENRICHMENT PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds TOURETTE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds GIVING TREE GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC MEN'S FELLOWSHIP OF PHOENIX INC ↗
  • Who funds CANCER BRIDGES ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF CORPUS CHRISTI ROSARY SCHOOL TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Lazarex Cancer Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Phil…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Bank of America C…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Morgan Stanley Global…Donor Advised Charita…Natl Christian Charit…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY11.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Maureen & Mark Rossi Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Maureen & Mark Rossi Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Ave Maria University Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Maureen & Mark Rossi Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Maureen & Mark Rossi Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Maureen & Mark Rossi’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home