Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Matthew 620 Foundation

Support the purpose of Christian Community Foundation DBA WaterStone

$304k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Religion$1.0MInternational$231kYouth Development$48kHuman Services$10kArts & Culture$10k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $287,104 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $304,044 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $16,940 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $122k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$29,604
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Summit Ministries$100,000
IF Gathering$50,000
Crossroads Church of Aspen$36,000
Watermark Community Church$36,000
Family Legacy Missions Int$29,604
Matthew 10 International$10,000
Actions in Africa$10,000
Helping Hands Ministries$8,000
CRU$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Helping Hands Ministries: $8k → 9%Matthew 10 International: $10k → 12%Matthew 10 International: $8k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
OR
IA
CO
AZ
TN
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 12 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against -45% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$1.3M
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
-45%

Still filing today

58%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalReligionEducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    SUMMIT MINISTRIES INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $300k · revenue +22%
  • IG
    IF GATHERING
    4× · 2021–2024 · $200k · revenue +91%
  • AN
    AFRICA NEW LIFE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL
    3× · 2021–2023 · $37k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -45%
  • TR
    THE REFUGE FOR DMST
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -59%
  • MM
    MATTHEWS MEMORIAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF ALBANY
    one grant, 2023 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
2
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

3
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
4
Freedom in Christ Ministries

To provide resources, training, and continuing support to leaders in the us and around the world in order that they may help others find freedom in christ.

Religion
5
Zimzam Global

Equip and develop leaders and church planters (includes evangelism, discipleship, leadership development and church planting). empower children and, through them, next generation churches. engage communities through the church as a…

Religion
6
Reconciliation Ministries International Inc

Reconciliaton Ministries Intl. is a Christian evangelical organization preaching and teaching the Word of God in over 60 countries. The ministry equips and encourages Christians everywhere to be saved, healed, and delivered according to…

Religion
7
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
8
A Jesus Mission

A Jesus Mission creates unique opportunities for individuals or teams to serves as Christian missionaires around the world through traditional evangelism, discipleship training, and outreach.

Religion
9
Amazima Ministries International Education and Empowerment for East

To make disciples of Jesus through authentic relationships, excellent education, and strengthened communities.

International
10
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
11
Christian Harvest International Min

To provide strategic teaching about prayer, prophecy, and intercession in the US and abroad. Books, manuals, and audio teachings are also used to equip Christians in strategic level spiritual prayer and warfare.

Religion
12
I58 Global

i58 Global is a Christian ministry dedicated to recruiting, sending and organizing relief workers to provide aid and share hope to refugees in various European countries.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life and the most unlike its peers is Friends of United Hatzalah Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SUMMIT MINISTRIES INC — $300,000 · OtherSUMMIT MINISTRIES INCFOCUS ON THE FAMILY — $166,088 · OtherFOCUS ON THE FAMILYCROSSROADS CHURCH OF ASPEN — $166,000 · OtherCROSSROADS CHURCH OF ASPENFamily Legacy Missions International — $158,308 · OtherFamily Legacy Missions InternationalCALVARY CHAPEL OF PUERTO RICO INC — $92,000 · OtherCALVARY CHAPEL OF PUERTO RICO INCWATERMARK COMMUNITY CHURCH — $72,000 · OtherWATERMARK COMMUNITY CHURCHTHE GREAT COMMISSION FOUNDATION OF CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC — $34,500 · Other+2 more — $18,000 · OtherIF GATHERING — $200,000 · ReligionIF GATHERINGAFRICA NEW LIFE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL — $37,320 · EducationACTION IN AFRICA INC — $35,000 · InternationalMatthew 10 International Ministry Inc Attn Dr Pete Sulack — $17,500 · Human ServicesHELPING HANDS MINISTRIES INC — $8,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG LIFE — $13,600 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,006,896Religion$200,000Education$37,320International$35,000Human Services$25,500Youth Development$13,600Arts & Culture$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSUMMIT MINISTRIES INC — $300,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetIF GATHERING — $200,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetFamily Legacy Missions International — $158,308 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAFRICA NEW LIFE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL — $37,320 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetACTION IN AFRICA INC — $35,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetMatthew 10 International Ministry Inc Attn Dr Pete Sulack — $17,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $13,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE REFUGE FOR DMST — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHELPING HANDS MINISTRIES INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SUMMIT MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds IF GATHERING
  • Who funds Family Legacy Missions International
  • Who funds AFRICA NEW LIFE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds ACTION IN AFRICA INC
  • Who funds Matthew 10 International Ministry Inc Attn Dr Pete Sulack
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC
  • Who funds THE REFUGE FOR DMST
  • Who funds HELPING HANDS MINISTRIES INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO18.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Servant Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Matthew 620 Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Matthew 620 Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Matthew 620 Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph