· Private foundation
Mary S Mulligan Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k31 grants · $130k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $121k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TUFTS UNIVERSITY | $36,150 |
| GEVA THEATRE CENTER | $25,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE | $15,000 |
| ABBY WHITESIDE FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| ROCHESTER FRINGE FESTIVAL INC | $10,000 |
| YOUNG WOMEN'S LEADERSHIP NETWORK | $10,000 |
| WRITERS AND BOOKS | $10,000 |
| GENESEE COUNTRY VILLAGE & MUSEUM | $6,000 |
| LINWOOD LTD | $5,225 |
| BOA EDITIONS LTD | $5,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF GREATER ROCHESTER | $5,000 |
| DAVID HOCHSTEIN MEMORIAL MUSIC SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ROCHESTER | $5,000 |
| HILLSIDE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| JUDICIAL PROCESS COMMISSION | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
36 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GTGEVA THEATRE CENTER INC6× · 2020–2025 · $170k · revenue +5%
- WBWRITERS & BOOKS INC6× · 2020–2025 · $140k · revenue +16%
Trustees of Tufts College5× · 2021–2025 · $96k · revenue +17%
Funded once
- AFASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND ANDone grant, 2020 · $5k
- SHSOJOURNER HOUSEone grant, 2020 · $5k
- RRAIHNone grant, 2020 · $4k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of new york city center is to be new york city's leading center for dance and musical theater. dedicated to making the arts accessible to the broadest possible audience, city center seeks to create a welcoming environment and…
Rochester art center offers the opportunity for all people to understand and value the arts through innovative experiences with contemporary art. through world-class exhibitions and programs, we present a welcoming, integrated, and diverse…
The mission of rochester civic theatre is to engage community organizations through collaboration and shared resources, enrich lives through education and outreach, and elevate human connection through theatre arts.
The rep's mission is to provide theater productions of the highest quality that will challenge, develop and enhance the skills of directors, actors, designers and technicians, while intriguing, challenging and delighting our audiences.
To engage the community in life-long learning for all through equal access to information, technology, gathering spaces and expert staff.
The mission of the Roxie is to promote and preserve the art of film and theater while encouraging independent thought and artistic experimentation in an ever-growing community of artists and arts supporters.
The rochester opera house is a nonprofit performing arts organization. its mission is to entertain, stimulate and educate audiences of all ages with high quality artistic programming, and to preserve historic rochester opera house as a…
To provide an artistic home for the development and production of contemporary plays that engage and challenge a diverse audience.
FLO is committed to the professional creation and production of opera in Rochester and the Finger Lakes region with a roster of mainstage and emerging young artists drawn from diverse regions and backgrounds. Through engagement and…
A center for exhibitions, information, and documentation about living artists since 1977, which continues to be a place of experimentation and a hub of new art and new ideas.
Productions
Creative residency programs, artist development workshops, advanced training opportunities, and mentorship for professional actors and people who wish to participate in the performing arts.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Geva Theatre Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Self Reliance New Wave of Immigrants Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GEVA THEATRE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WRITERS & BOOKS INC ↗
- Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
- Who funds ABBY WHITESIDE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Rochester Fringe Festival Inc ↗
- Who funds BOA EDITIONS LTD ↗
- Who funds GENESEE COUNTRY MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Push Physical Theatre Inc ↗
- Who funds ROCHESTER CONTEMPORARY ART CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds JUDICIAL PROCESS COMMISSION INC ↗
- Who funds LOTTS CREEK COMMUNITY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds DIMITRI HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds WILLOW DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds Joseph Avenue Arts and Culture Alliance Inc ↗
- Who funds LINWOOD LTD ↗
- Who funds The David Hochstein Memorial Music School Inc ↗
- Who funds Cancer Action Inc DBA Cancer Support Community Rochester ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ROCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds SENECA PARK ZOO SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds HILLSIDE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ROCHESTER PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds FOODLINK INC ↗
- Who funds STUDENT LEADERSHIP NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds COMPEER ROCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds Family Promise of Greater Rochester Inc ↗
- Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF ROCHESTER & MONROE COUNTY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ↗
- Who funds HILLSIDE CHILDREN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology ↗
- Who funds ROCHESTER FRIENDLY HOME ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rochester Area Community Foundation · Max and Marian Farash Charitable Foundation · Daisy Marquis Jones Foundation · United Way of Greater Rochester and the Finger Lakes Inc · Paychex Charitable Foundation Inc · Ames-Amzalak Memorial Trust · Esl Charitable Foundation · Rochester Area Community Foundation Depository Inc · The Polisseni Foundation Inc · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · Alstom Signaling Foundation Inc · The Guido and Ellen Palma Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mary S Mulligan Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.