· Private foundation
The Guido and Ellen Palma Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k34 grants · $206k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GENESEE-ORLEANS REGIONAL ARTS COUNCIL | $10,000 |
| ROCHESTER PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA | $10,000 |
| DEEP ARTS INC | $10,000 |
| DISCOVERY ACADEMY OF SCIENCE AND ART (DASA) PRESCHOOL | $10,000 |
| ROCHESTER CITY BALLET | $10,000 |
| PUSH PHYSICAL THEATRE | $9,000 |
| GENESEE COUNTRY VILLAGE AND MUSEUM | $7,500 |
| FLOWER CITY ARTS CENTER | $7,500 |
| MEMORIAL ART GALLERY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER | $7,500 |
| CAYUGA MUSEUM OF HISTORY & ART | $7,500 |
| WRITERS & BOOKS | $7,500 |
| HOPE HALL | $7,500 |
| LANDMARK SOCIETY OF WESTERN NEW YORK | $7,500 |
| CORN HILL WATERFRONT & NAVIGATION FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
| THE KEYS PROGRAM | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $61k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
47 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GRGenesee-Orleanse Regional Arts Council3× · 2022–2025 · $35k · revenue +50%
- GCGENESEE COUNTRY MUSEUM4× · 2020–2025 · $33k · revenue +78%
- WBWRITERS & BOOKS INC4× · 2021–2025 · $33k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- DIDASAP Incgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +26%
- AIASSISI INSTITUTEone grant, 2022 · $10k
- HFHILLSIDE FAMILY OF AGENCIESone grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue -9%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The rochester opera house is a nonprofit performing arts organization. its mission is to entertain, stimulate and educate audiences of all ages with high quality artistic programming, and to preserve historic rochester opera house as a…
The mission of rochester civic theatre is to engage community organizations through collaboration and shared resources, enrich lives through education and outreach, and elevate human connection through theatre arts.
The rep's mission is to provide theater productions of the highest quality that will challenge, develop and enhance the skills of directors, actors, designers and technicians, while intriguing, challenging and delighting our audiences.
To engage the community in life-long learning for all through equal access to information, technology, gathering spaces and expert staff.
To create dialogue and build community through contemporary art exhibitions and related programs
Rochester art center offers the opportunity for all people to understand and value the arts through innovative experiences with contemporary art. through world-class exhibitions and programs, we present a welcoming, integrated, and diverse…
Productions
The Center's mission is to inspire, entertain, educate, and serve all in Northern Michigan year-round by presenting exceptional experiences across the full spectrum of the performing arts and offering impactful educational opportunities.
The mission of Syracuse Children's Theatre is to provide cultural enrichment to the children of Central New York through enjoyable, exciting and enlightening theatrical experiences, as well as highly acclaimed children's theatrical…
The mission of the Binghamton Philharmonic is building community through the power of live music.
A summer arts program for children, exhibitions, performances, literary events, and community arts in education outreach.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Geva Theatre Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Humane Society of Rochester & Monroe County for the Prevention of Cruelty to. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 25. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 14% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Genesee-Orleanse Regional Arts Council ↗
- Who funds GENESEE COUNTRY MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds SENECA PARK ZOO SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds WRITERS & BOOKS INC ↗
- Who funds ROCHESTER PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds KEYS CORP ↗
- Who funds A MAGICAL JOURNEY THRU STAGES INC ↗
- Who funds Flower City Arts Center Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ROCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds Joseph Avenue Arts and Culture Alliance Inc ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
- Who funds Deep Arts Inc ↗
- Who funds The Center for Youth Services Inc ↗
- Who funds ROCHESTER CITY BALLET INC ↗
- Who funds MARY CARIOLA CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE LANDMARK SOCIETY OF WESTERN NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds Push Physical Theatre Inc ↗
- Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF ROCHESTER & MONROE COUNTY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ↗
- Who funds FINGER LAKES OPERA INC ↗
- Who funds VILLA OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds Girls Rock Rochester INC ↗
- Who funds Canandaigua Lake Watershed Association ↗
- Who funds MACEDON PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds Clyde Savannah Public Library ↗
- Who funds THE CORN HILL WATERFRONT & NAVIGATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AUTISMUP INC ↗
- Who funds Endless Highway Inc ↗
- Who funds CAYUGA MUSEUM OF HISTORY & ART INC ↗
- Who funds BORINQUEN DANCE THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds RAINBOW JUNCTION LTD ↗
- Who funds CAMP PUZZLE PEACE ↗
- Who funds ROCHESTER MUSEUM & SCIENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds GEVA THEATRE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds DASAP Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rochester Area Community Foundation · Max and Marian Farash Charitable Foundation · Esl Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater Rochester and the Finger Lakes Inc · Daisy Marquis Jones Foundation · Rochester Area Community Foundation Depository Inc · William & Sheila Konar Foundation · Paychex Charitable Foundation Inc · Ames-Amzalak Memorial Trust · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · Greater Rochester Health Foundation · The Joan and Harold Feinbloom Supporting Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Guido and Ellen Palma Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.