Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Marinus and Minna B Koster Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$225k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Arts & Culture$984kHuman Services$221kEmployment$156kEducation$156kYouth Development$42kCivil Rights$41kReligion$21kCrime & Legal$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $196k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$7.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EDLAVITCH JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF DC$30,000
DC YOUTH ORCHESTRA PROGRAM$20,000
PENNSYLVANIA WOMEN WORK$18,000
SITAR ARTS CENTER$18,000
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION$15,000
CENTER FOR TRADITIONAL MUSIC AND DANCE$13,000
AMERICAN YOUTH PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRAS$12,000
END SIJS BACKLOG COALITION$10,000
AVODAH THE JEWISH SERVICE CORPS$10,000
STRATHMORE HALL FOUNDATION$10,000
THE WORKERS CIRCLE$10,000
AMERICAN UNIVERSITY$10,000
STRATHMORE HALL FOUNDATION$10,000
THE FORWARD ASSOCIATION$10,000
EDU-FUTURO$8,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $168k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA WOMEN WORK: $20k → 11%BENDER JCC OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $10k → 8%PENNSYLVANIA WOMEN WORK: $18k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA WOMEN WORK: $17k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA WOMEN WORK: $16k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA WOMEN WORK: $15k → 11%BENDER JCC OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $10k → 8%PENNSYLVANIA WOMEN WORK: $15k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA WOMEN WORK: $15k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA WOMEN WORK: $10k → 11%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $5k → 8%LUTHERAN SOCIA SERVICES OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA: $12k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 5% of Marinus and Minna B Koster Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Marinus and Minna B Koster Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.3% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 26 repeat orgs$136k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

26 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
14

Total granted

$1.5M
$96k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+19%

Still filing today

65%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationInternationalCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EJ
    EDLAVITCH JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF WASHINGTON DC INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $164k · revenue +22%
  • PW
    PENNSYLVANIA WOMEN WORK
    8× · 2018–2025 · $126k · revenue +47%
  • DC YOUTH ORCHESTRA PROGRAM
    8× · 2018–2025 · $126k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • TJ
    THE JEWISH SERVICE CORPS
    one grant, 2022 · $13k
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    one grant, 2022 · $12k · revenue -40%
  • LS
    LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES NATIONAL CAPITAL AREAINC
    one grant, 2022 · $12k · revenue +19%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Young Men's and Young Women's Hebrew Association

For over 150 years, the 92nd street y, new york has been serving its communities and the larger world by bringing people together (continued on schedule o)and providing exceptional, groundbreaking programs in the performing and visual…

Religion
2
Manhattan School of Music

Manhattan school of music is deeply committed to excellence in education, performance, and creative activity; to the humanity of the school's environment; and to the cultural enrichment of the larger community. a premiere international…

Arts & Culture
3
Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History

The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…

Arts & Culture
4
Move(Nyc) Foundation Inc

Move|nyc| is a civic arts and social justice organization committed to cultivating a more diverse and inclusive society through transforming the field of professional dance. more than an arts organization, move|nyc| is a movement for…

Public Benefit
5
The Diller-Quaile School of Music Inc

For more than a century, diller-quaile has offered an environment where music can flourish in all its aspects, enriching the lives of students of all ages and cultural backgrounds. the belief that music is a fundamental part of human life…

Arts & Culture
6
San Francisco Jazz Organization

The san francisco jazz organization (the organization) is a recognized international leader in jazz creation, presentation, and education. the organization explores the full spectrum of jazz, from the music's origins in the african…

Arts & Culture
7
Young Concert Artists Inc

The mission of the organization is to discover and launch the careers of extraordinary young classical musicians, and to expand the reach and relevance of classical music.

Arts & Culture
8
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
9
Annapolis Symphony Orchestra Inc

The mission of the annapolis symphony orchestra is to inspire, educate and enrich lives near and far by creating extraordinary musical experiences with uncompromising artistic excellence.

Arts & Culture
10
Equity Arc

Equity arc is a coalition charged by its diverse membership of local and national organizations to align, promote, and develop equitable opportunities for aspiring classical musicians from underrepresented ethnicities.

Arts & Culture
11
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
12
New World Symphony Inc

Prepares gifted graduates of prestigious music programs for successful careers in orchestras and ensembles.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Forward Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is In Geveb Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Public University Foundatio…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Jewish Community FederationsClassical Music Ensembles
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%32%35–55yr16%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr13%34%35–55yr16%19%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,539

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
18/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DC YOUTH ORCHESTRA PROGRAM — $125,500 · Arts & CultureDC YOUTH ORCHESTRA PROGRAMSITAR ARTS CENTER — $121,500 · Arts & CultureSITAR ARTS CENTERThe Forward Association Inc — $90,000 · Arts & CultureThe Forward Association IncIn Geveb Inc — $78,000 · Arts & CultureIn Geveb IncAMERICAN YOUTH PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRAS — $66,500 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN YOUTH PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRASTHE WASHINGTON CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC — $65,500 · Arts & CultureTHE WASHINGTON CONSERVATORY OF MUSICTHE STRATHMORE HALL FOUNDATION INC — $57,500 · Arts & CultureTHE STRATHMORE HALL FOUNDATION INCLEVINE MUSIC INC — $52,000 · Arts & CultureLEVINE MUSIC INCBLUES ALLEY JAZZ SOCIETY — $50,000 · Arts & CultureBLUES ALLEY JAZZ SOCIETYCenter for Traditional Music and Dance Inc — $43,000 · Arts & CultureCenter for Traditional Music and Dance IncEDLAVITCH JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF WASHINGTON DC INC — $164,000 · OtherEDLAVITCH JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTE…Individual grant recipient — $45,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDI GOLDENE KEYT LTD — $38,000 · OtherDI GOLDENE KEYT LTDEDLAVITCH JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF DC — $30,000 · OtherEDLAVITCH JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTE…THE WORKERS CIRCLE — $30,000 · OtherTHE WORKERS CIRCLELUTHERAN CHURCH OF THE REFORMATION -GOOD NEIGHBORS BAPITOL HILL REFUGEE RES — $17,500 · OtherNEW YIDDISH REPERTORY THEATER — $17,500 · OtherJEWISH PEOPLE'S PHILHARMONIC CHORUS — $16,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $16,000 · Other+9 more — $59,000 · Other+9 moreAMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $88,000 · EducationAMERICAN UNIV…UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC — $67,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF…EDU-FUTURO — $41,500 · EducationEDU-FUTUROPENNSYLVANIA WOMEN WORK — $126,000 · Human ServicesPENNSYLVANI…BENDER JCC OF GREATER WASHINGTON — $20,000 · Human ServicesBENDER JCC …LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES NATIONAL CAPITAL AREAINC — $12,250 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN SO…+2 more — $10,000 · Human Services+2 moreAVODAH THE JEWISH SERVICE CORPS INC — $31,000 · Community ImprovementWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $12,250 · InternationalHIAS INC — $5,000 · InternationalNATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD INC — $10,000 · Civil RightsMIGRATION RESOURCE CENTER — $7,500 · Crime & Legal
Arts & Culture$749,500Other$473,500Education$197,000Human Services$168,250Community Improvement$31,000International$17,250Civil Rights$10,000Crime & Legal$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEDLAVITCH JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF WASHINGTON DC INC — $164,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA WOMEN WORK — $126,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetDC YOUTH ORCHESTRA PROGRAM — $125,500 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetSITAR ARTS CENTER — $121,500 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetThe Forward Association Inc — $90,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $88,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetIn Geveb Inc — $78,000 over 8y, 41% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC — $67,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN YOUTH PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRAS — $66,500 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetTHE WASHINGTON CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC — $65,500 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetTHE STRATHMORE HALL FOUNDATION INC — $57,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLEVINE MUSIC INC — $52,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBLUES ALLEY JAZZ SOCIETY — $50,000 over 5y, 22% of budgetCenter for Traditional Music and Dance Inc — $43,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetEDU-FUTURO — $41,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetAVODAH THE JEWISH SERVICE CORPS INC — $31,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBENDER JCC OF GREATER WASHINGTON — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $12,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES NATIONAL CAPITAL AREAINC — $12,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMIGRATION RESOURCE CENTER — $7,500 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLYMOUTH PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHIAS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYUGNTRUF-YOUTH FOR YIDDISH INC — $4,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EDLAVITCH JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF WASHINGTON DC INC
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA WOMEN WORK
  • Who funds DC YOUTH ORCHESTRA PROGRAM
  • Who funds SITAR ARTS CENTER
  • Who funds The Forward Association Inc
  • Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds In Geveb Inc
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN YOUTH PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRAS
  • Who funds THE WASHINGTON CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC
  • Who funds THE STRATHMORE HALL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds LEVINE MUSIC INC
  • Who funds BLUES ALLEY JAZZ SOCIETY
  • Who funds Center for Traditional Music and Dance Inc
  • Who funds EDU-FUTURO
  • Who funds AVODAH THE JEWISH SERVICE CORPS INC
  • Who funds BENDER JCC OF GREATER WASHINGTON
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES NATIONAL CAPITAL AREAINC
  • Who funds NATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD INC
  • Who funds MIGRATION RESOURCE CENTER
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH
  • Who funds PLYMOUTH PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA INC
  • Who funds HIAS INC
  • Who funds JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Clark-Winchcole FoundationMD19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Clark-Winchcole Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Galena-Yorktown Foundation · Dimick Foundation John M Lynham Jr Trustee · Dallas Morse Coors Foundation for the Performing Arts · Howard and Geraldine Polinger Family Foundation · World Bank Community Connections Fund · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · Hattie M Strong Foundation · Harman Family Foundation · Arts and Humanities Council of Montgomer

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Marinus and Minna B Koster Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Hias Inc88% of income from government
  • The Strathmore Hall Foundation Inc7% of income from government
  • Bender Jcc of Greater Washington1% of income from government
  • Jewish Social Service Agency1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Marinus and Minna B Koster Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Marinus and Minna B Koster Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph