Skip to content
Marietta K Randall Foundation Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Marietta K Randall Foundation Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$117kHuman Services$100kHousing & Shelter$48kReligion$25kYouth Development$18kFood & Nutrition$11kEducation$9kEnvironment$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$886k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$10,000
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$8,000
GUADALUPE COMMUNITY CENTER$4,000
ST PETER-ST JOSEPH CHILDRENS HOME$3,000
GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER SAN ANTONIO$3,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES ACHDIOCESE$3,000
SETON HOME$2,000
SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRY INC$2,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN ANTONIO$2,000
BIG BROTHERS AND SISTERS OF SOUTH TEXAS$1,000
SAN ANTONIO MARRIAGE INITIATIVE$1,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC$1,000
ROY MAAS YOUTH ALTERNATIVES$1,000
HAVEN FOR HOPE OF BEXAR COUNTY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $58k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ST JUDE'S RANCH FOR CHILDREN TEXAS REGION INC: $3k → 7%HILL COUNTRY YOUTH RANCH: $4k → 13%FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION SERVICES INC: $2k → 16%ST JUDE'S RANCH FOR CHILDREN TEXAS REGION INC: $2k → 7%BOYSVILLE FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION SERVICES INC: $1k → 16%FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION SERVICES INC: $1k → 16%THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $3k → 16%THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $2k → 16%THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $1k → 16%GUADALUPE COMMUNITY CENTER: $4k → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER SAN ANTONIO: $3k → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER SAN ANTONIO: $2k → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER SAN ANTONIO: $2k → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER SAN ANTONIO: $2k → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER SAN ANTONIO: $2k → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER SAN ANTONIO: $2k → 16%SUCCESSFUL CONNECTIONS INC: $2k → 16%CHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE MINISTRY: $3k → 16%CHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE MINISTRY: $2k → 16%HOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY SERVICE: $1k → 16%FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $2k → 16%ANY BABY CAN OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $2k → 16%FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $2k → 16%FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $2k → 16%ANY BABY CAN OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $2k → 16%FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $1k → 16%CHILDSAFE: $2k → 16%CHILDSAFE: $1k → 16%MORNINGSIDE MINISTRIES: $1k → 16%THE CHILDRENS SHELTER: $2k → 16%THE CHILDRENS SHELTER: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$288k · 32 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
24

Total granted

$288k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+3%

Still filing today

75%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $83k · revenue +72%
  • SA
    SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $16k · revenue +111%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    3× · 2022–2025 · $15k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • HC
    HILL COUNTRY YOUTH RANCH
    one grant, 2022 · $4k · revenue +3%
  • EC
    ECUMENICAL CENTER FOR RELIGION AND HEALT
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +7%
  • OL
    OUR LADY OF THE HILLS COLLEGE PREP
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Antonio Foster Care and Adoption and Services

San antonio foster care and adoption services inc. is a licensed child placement agency in the state of texas. the organization cares for children placed in foster care by the state of texas.

Human Services
2
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of San Antonio Inc

To provide a safe, caring, and temporary home away from home for the families of children receiving essential medical services in san antonio, texas.

Health
3
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
4
Child Advocates San Antonio

To recruit, develop, and lead court-appointed volunteer advocates who provide constancy for abused and neglected children and youth while advocating for services and placement in safe and permanent homes.

Civil Rights
5
Respite Care of San Antonio Inc

Respite Care of San Antonio is dedicated to providing specialized care for children with special needs and complex medical conditions through a General Residential Operation (GRO), Developmental Childcare Center, and Community Programs for…

Human Services
6
Communities in Schools of San Antonio

To surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.

Education
7
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
8
Children's Aid Society of West Tx Inc

To provide shelter, supervision, and counseling for children in crisis; to cooperate with other agencies in order to resolve problems related to the welfare of these children; to assist the families of these children in seeking possible…

Human Services
9
Casa of South Texas Inc

Child Advocacy

Human Services
10
Advocates Social Services of San Antonio Texas

To educate qualified individuals of public benefits that they may be entitled to. we accomplish this by working with local city, state, and federal agencies for the purpose of outreach and verification work. recently we have focused mainly…

—
11
San Antonio Christian School

Partner with families to provide students a christ-centered education while fostering a life of faith and service. the school desires to associate with like-minded teachers, administrators, staff, parents, and students to communicate the…

—
12
Family and Child Guidance Center

Our mission is to provide quality mental health services to children and adults in low income families who are impacted by severe and persistent mental illness, emotional disturbances, child abuse and neglect, high-risk behaviors and…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Good Samaritan Center of San Antonio; the most unlike its peers is Texas Diaper Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/42
Grantees still filing
30/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $16,393 · OtherSAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INCST PETER-ST JOSEPH CHILDRENS HOME: $15,750 · OtherST PETER-ST JOSEPH CHILDRENS HOMESETON HOME INC: $13,500 · OtherSETON HOME INCTHE SALVATION ARMY: $11,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYCATHOLIC CHARITIES ACHDIOCESE: $8,500 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES ACHDIOCESEBENEDICTINE SISTERS: $7,000 · OtherBENEDICTINE SISTERSSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $7,000 · OtherSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANKDISCALCED CARMELITE FATHERS OF SAN ANTONIO: $4,500 · Other+21 more: $43,600 · Other+21 moreCHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $83,000 · HealthCHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $15,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDRENRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $5,500 · Health+6 more: $8,500 · Health+6 moreGOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO: $12,000 · Human ServicesGOOD SAMARITAN CENT…THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $8,500 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S SHEL…Family Service Association of San Antonio Inc: $6,500 · Human ServicesFamily Service Asso…Christian Assistance Ministry: $4,500 · Human ServicesChristian Assistanc…GUADALUPE COMMUNITY CENTER: $4,000 · Human ServicesGUADALUPE COMMUNITY…FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION SERVICES INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY VIOLENCE PRE…SJRC TEXAS INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesSJRC TEXAS INCANY BABY CAN OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $3,500 · Human ServicesANY BABY CAN OF SAN…HILL COUNTRY YOUTH RANCH: $3,500 · Human ServicesHILL COUNTRY YOUTH …CHILDSAFE: $2,500 · Human Services+4 more: $5,000 · Human Services+4 moreHaven for Hope of Bexar County: $12,000 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $6,500 · Housing & ShelterBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SAN ANTONIO: $7,500 · Youth DevelopmentSAN ANTONIO MARRIAGE INITIATIVE: $5,000 · ReligionHeadwaters at Incarnate Word Inc: $2,500 · Crime & LegalJOVEN INC: $1,500 · Crime & Legal
Other$127,243Health$112,000Human Services$58,000Housing & Shelter$18,500Youth Development$7,500Religion$5,000Crime & Legal$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $83,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $16,393 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHaven for Hope of Bexar County: $12,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO: $12,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $8,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SAN ANTONIO: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Service Association of San Antonio Inc: $6,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $5,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSAN ANTONIO MARRIAGE INITIATIVE: $5,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetChristian Assistance Ministry: $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGUADALUPE COMMUNITY CENTER: $4,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION SERVICES INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF AUSTIN: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSJRC TEXAS INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANY BABY CAN OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHILL COUNTRY YOUTH RANCH: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS SAN ANTONIO: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetECUMENICAL CENTER FOR RELIGION AND HEALT: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SAN ANTONIO: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHeadwaters at Incarnate Word Inc: $2,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDSAFE: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROY MAAS' YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC: $2,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKinetic Kids Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHWEST TEXAS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL & SOUTH TEXAS: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHTON CENTER: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLARITY CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMPOWER HOUSE SA: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJOVEN INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOYSVILLE FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSUCCESSFUL CONNECTIONS INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetProject MEND: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAUTISTIC TREATMENT CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH TEXAS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMORNINGSIDE MINISTRIES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHouse of Neighborly Service of San Antonio Texas: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS DIAPER BANK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAILY BREAD MINISTRIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area Foun…Harvey E Najim Charit…Faye L & William L Co…Nancy Smith Hurd Foun…The Texas Cavaliers C…Marcia & Otto Koehler…St Luke's Lutheran He…John L Santikos Chari…The Charity Ball Asso…Elizabeth Huth Coates…United Way of San Ant…Carl C Anderson Sr an…
San Antonio Area FoundationTX68× affinity32 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation · Marcia & Otto Koehler Foundation · St Luke's Lutheran Health Ministries Inc · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · The Charity Ball Association of San Antonio Inc · Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992 · United Way of San Antonio and Bexar County · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marietta K Randall Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marietta K Randall Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Marietta K Randall’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home