· Private foundation
Marietta K Randall Foundation Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k13 grants · $32k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN | $8,000 |
| GUADALUPE COMMUNITY CENTER | $4,000 |
| ST PETER-ST JOSEPH CHILDRENS HOME | $3,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES ACHDIOCESE | $3,000 |
| GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER SAN ANTONIO | $3,000 |
| SETON HOME | $2,000 |
| SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRY INC | $2,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN ANTONIO | $2,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC | $1,000 |
| HAVEN FOR HOPE OF BEXAR COUNTY | $1,000 |
| SAN ANTONIO MARRIAGE INITIATIVE | $1,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS AND SISTERS OF SOUTH TEXAS | $1,000 |
| ROY MAAS YOUTH ALTERNATIVES | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $58k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +60% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
32 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION9× · 2017–2025 · $83k · revenue +72%
- SASAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC7× · 2019–2025 · $16k · revenue +80%
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN3× · 2022–2025 · $15k · revenue +78%
Funded once
- HCHILL COUNTRY YOUTH RANCHone grant, 2022 · $4k · revenue +3%
- ECECUMENICAL CENTER FOR RELIGION AND HEALTone grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +7%
- OLOUR LADY OF THE HILLS COLLEGE PREPone grant, 2024 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
San antonio foster care and adoption services inc. is a licensed child placement agency in the state of texas. the organization cares for children placed in foster care by the state of texas.
To provide a safe, caring, and temporary home away from home for the families of children receiving essential medical services in san antonio, texas.
Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.
To recruit, develop, and lead court-appointed volunteer advocates who provide constancy for abused and neglected children and youth while advocating for services and placement in safe and permanent homes.
Respite Care of San Antonio is dedicated to providing specialized care for children with special needs and complex medical conditions through a General Residential Operation (GRO), Developmental Childcare Center, and Community Programs for…
To surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.
To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.
To provide shelter, supervision, and counseling for children in crisis; to cooperate with other agencies in order to resolve problems related to the welfare of these children; to assist the families of these children in seeking possible…
Child Advocacy
To educate qualified individuals of public benefits that they may be entitled to. we accomplish this by working with local city, state, and federal agencies for the purpose of outreach and verification work. recently we have focused mainly…
Partner with families to provide students a christ-centered education while fostering a life of faith and service. the school desires to associate with like-minded teachers, administrators, staff, parents, and students to communicate the…
Our mission is to provide quality mental health services to children and adults in low income families who are impacted by severe and persistent mental illness, emotional disturbances, child abuse and neglect, high-risk behaviors and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Good Samaritan Center of San Antonio and the most unlike its peers is Texas Diaper Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds Haven for Hope of Bexar County ↗
- Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Family Service Association of San Antonio Inc ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SAN ANTONIO INC ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO MARRIAGE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds Christian Assistance Ministry ↗
- Who funds GUADALUPE COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF AUSTIN ↗
- Who funds SJRC TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds HILL COUNTRY YOUTH RANCH ↗
- Who funds ANY BABY CAN OF SAN ANTONIO INC ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds CHILDSAFE ↗
- Who funds ECUMENICAL CENTER FOR RELIGION AND HEALT ↗
- Who funds Headwaters at Incarnate Word Inc ↗
- Who funds ROY MAAS' YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds HILL COUNTRY CHRISTIAN COUNSELING INC ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHWEST TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds Kinetic Kids Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation · Marcia & Otto Koehler Foundation · St Luke's Lutheran Health Ministries Inc · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · The Charity Ball Association of San Antonio Inc · Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992 · United Way of San Antonio and Bexar County · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Marietta K Randall Foundation Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.