· Private foundation
Marian & Pinkus Happ Fund
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES | $10,000 |
| MCKINLEY CHILDRENS CENTER INC | $10,000 |
| LOVE MORE | $10,000 |
| BLIND CHILDRENS CENTER INC | $10,000 |
| GIANT STEPS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTE | $8,000 |
| THREE STARLINGS FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| KIDS ENJOY EXERCISE NOW | $5,000 |
| NORTH COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC | $4,500 |
| WE CARE SERVICES FOR CHILDREN | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $233k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMcKinley Children's Center Inc4× · 2019–2025 · $35k · revenue +117%
- SASt Anne's Family Services3× · 2019–2024 · $35k · revenue +63%
- WFWayfinder Family Services4× · 2019–2024 · $33k · revenue +43%
Funded once
- SPSAFE - PROJECT USone grant, 2023 · $12k
- CKCONGA KIDSgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +472%
- CCCATERINAS CLUBone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -5%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)
Child lane provides care in an environment where play is valued and children are supported to reach their full potential.
By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…
Our mission is to provide our children and families with love, education and family based concurrent services. We feel honored to have served more than 20,176 children and youth during our 31 years of service.
QCS provides early childhood development and childcare program services to children from underserved and disadvantaged families. The programs are funded by various governmental entities and are located in the counties of Los Angeles Madera…
Bayfront Youth & Family Services is a quality provider of behavioral and mental health treatment services for children, adolescents, and their caregivers. Our mission is to provide a comprehensive support system that promotes safe and…
The mission of the Family Care Network is to enhance the wellbeing of children, adults, and families in partnership with our community.
California Alliance of Caregivers represents the voices of relative and non-relative caregivers to promote the well-being of children in foster care. California Alliance of Caregivers provides training information support and advocacy for…
Through a holistic approach to emotional well-being, Wellnest offers hope, healing, and opportunity to the children, young adults, families, and communities we serve. Our commitment remains steadfast as we enter our second century of…
The center is a non-profit organization providing quality early education and care for infants, toddlers and preschool age children for the caltech and pasadena communities. caring, nurturing educators staff this outstanding program. the…
Ettie Lee Youth & Family Services ("Ettie Lee") operates residential care facilities, a network of treatment foster homes, a substance abuse treatment program and provides an array of mental health services for young people and their…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is We Care Services for Children and the most unlike its peers is Wayfinder Family Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ABILITYFIRST ↗
- Who funds McKinley Children's Center Inc ↗
- Who funds St Anne's Family Services ↗
- Who funds Wayfinder Family Services ↗
- Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds HOMELESS NOT TOOTHLESS ↗
- Who funds VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds The Blind Childrens Center Inc ↗
- Who funds California Aquatic Therapy & Wellness Center Inc ↗
- Who funds CONGA KIDS ↗
- Who funds CATERINAS CLUB ↗
- Who funds Yolo Crisis Nursery ↗
- Who funds EDUCATING STUDENTS TOGETHER INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOC OF OC ↗
- Who funds SAN PEDRO CITY BALLET ↗
- Who funds OUR HOUSE GRIEF SUPPORT CENTER ↗
- Who funds Helping Hands Society of Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds LOVE MORE ↗
- Who funds CLASSICS FOR KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds Giant Steps Therapeutic Equestrian Center Inc ↗
- Who funds NORTH COUNTY LIFELINE INC DBA LIFELINE COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds TOGETHER WE RISE ↗
- Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CONEJO VALLEY ↗
- Who funds KIDS ENJOY EXERCISE NOW LOS ANGELES CO DENTONS ↗
- Who funds THREE STARLINGS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds FEEDING SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds ECHOES OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds JEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds North County Education Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds We Care Services For Children ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Goodwin Family Memorial Tua · Henry L Guenther Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · California Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Thomas & Dorothy Leavey Foundation · Adams Mastrovich Fam Fdn · Carrie Estelle Doheny Foundation · S Mark Taper Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Network for Good
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Marian & Pinkus Happ Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.