Skip to content

New York · Private foundation

Mari and Norman Epstein Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$134k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
10
Grants FY2024
7
Organizations funded FY2023
0%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$20,421
Largest grant, FY2024
$25,000
Organizations funded a year
5 to 17
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
5
Total assets, FY2024
$451k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations Mari and Norman Epstein Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
AnimalsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CultureEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving8$134k0%
FY20237$141k0%
FY20225$101k20%
FY20217$167k0%
FY202015$154k13%
FY201913$92k15%
FY201817$95k53%
FY201712$62kn/a
97% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$833kEnvironment$54kFood & Nutrition$38kYouth Development$9kArts & Culture$6kHuman Services$3kHealth$1kEmployment$1kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Animal Equality$178,67361%
Wild Bird Fund Inc$159,04782%
Wildaid Inc$147,06871%
Animal Welfare Institute$97,77441%
International Primate Protection League$95,90281%
Rainforest Trust$54,16640%
The Humane League$46,00030%
American Bird Conservancy$27,79740%
Days End Farm Horse Rescue Inc$26,50070%
Mercy for Animals Inc$20,00010%
Show all 20 grantees
All grantees of Mari and Norman Epstein Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Animal Equality$178,67361%
Wild Bird Fund Inc$159,04782%
Wildaid Inc$147,06871%
Animal Welfare Institute$97,77441%
International Primate Protection League$95,90281%
Rainforest Trust$54,16640%
The Humane League$46,00030%
American Bird Conservancy$27,79740%
Days End Farm Horse Rescue Inc$26,50070%
Mercy for Animals Inc$20,00010%
Hunger Free America Inc$17,00030%
Wildlife Conservation Network Inc$16,00020%
The Good Food Institute Inc$16,00020%
Girls Inc$8,00040%
Animal Outlook Inc$6,00020%
Dancing Dreams$6,00041%
Whyhunger Inc$5,00010%
W Connection Inc$1,50021%
Compassion in World Farming Inc$1,0001n/a
Per Scholas Inc$1,00010%

Plus 6 recipients with no EIN on record ($16k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Mari and Norman Epstein Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAnimal Equality: $178,673 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetWild Bird Fund Inc: $159,047 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetWildaid Inc: $147,068 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetAnimal Welfare Institute: $97,774 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetInternational Primate Protection League: $95,902 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetRainforest Trust: $54,166 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe Humane League: $46,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Bird Conservancy: $27,797 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDays End Farm Horse Rescue Inc: $26,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetMercy for Animals Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHunger Free America Inc: $17,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWildlife Conservation Network Inc: $16,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Good Food Institute Inc: $16,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGirls Inc: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Outlook Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetDancing Dreams: $6,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetWhyhunger Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetW Connection Inc: $1,500 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetPer Scholas Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 19.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Mari and Norman Epstein Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mari and Norman Epstein Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Mari and Norman Epstein Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Mari and Norman Epstein Foundation

How much does Mari and Norman Epstein Foundation give?
Mari and Norman Epstein Foundation reported 10 grants totaling $133,686 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 17 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Mari and Norman Epstein Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Animals (88%), Environment (6%), Food & Nutrition (4%).
Who are Mari and Norman Epstein Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Animal Equality ($179k), Wild Bird Fund Inc ($159k), Wildaid Inc ($147k).
Does Mari and Norman Epstein Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Mari and Norman Epstein Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Mari and Norman Epstein Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Greater Kansas City Community Foundation, Aetna Foundation Inc, Network for Good.
Where is Mari and Norman Epstein Foundation based?
Mari and Norman Epstein Foundation is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mari and Norman Epstein’s filings →

More from the funding graph