Skip to content

· Public charity

Mann Charitable Foundation

To support causes helping a variety of charitable purposes through grants to applicable tax-exempt charitable organizations

$430k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$463kHealth$224kEducation$37kAnimals$30kPhilanthropy$26kCrime & Legal$25kInternational$25kHuman Services$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 22 grants below total $391,275, the rows itemized in this filing. The $429,982 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $38,707 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $249k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $105k
$12,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$775k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC$55,000
J Paul Getty Museum$50,000
Individual grant recipient$25,500
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES$25,000
HOLOCAUST MUSEUM$25,000
FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFENSE FUND$25,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER INC$25,000
ASIAN HALL OF FAME$20,992
ALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES$20,000
Etta$18,000
DEBBIE ALLEN DANCE ACADEMY$12,000
THE HAROLD & CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION$12,000
Partners In Care Foundation$10,362
ASIA SOCIETY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$10,300
Segerstrom Center for the Arts$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%American Friends of Unit 669: $5k → 16%FARHANG FOUNDATION: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$556k · 13 repeat orgs$342k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +6% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
13

Total granted

$556k
$194k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
0%

Still filing today

77%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $148k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesAnimalsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $155k · revenue +18%
  • HM
    HOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA
    3× · 2023–2025 · $50k · revenue +33%
  • AG
    ALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES
    2× · 2024–2025 · $30k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • GL
    GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue -7%
  • BT
    BET TZEDEK
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +11%
  • TH
    THE HEART FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +39%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lupus La Co Emerge

Lupus la promotes lupus research, awareness, and education, and serves the needs of people with lupus and their families in los angeles county

Health
2
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
3
California Institute for Immunology and Immunotherapy

To harness the power of the human immune system and advanced computing technologies to create and translate scientific discoveries into next generation vaccines and therapies for prevention, control and cure of chronic diseases, enabling…

Health
4
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
5
Armand Hammer Museum of Art and Cultural Center Inc

The hammer museum at ucla believes in the promise of art and ideas to illuminate our lives and build a more just world.

Arts & Culture
6
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
7
Los Angeles County Medical Association

To enhance the professionalism and clinical autonomy of physicians to allow them to advocate for their patients and the health of the community of los angeles.

—
8
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
9
Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce

Chamber's mission: design and advance opportunities and solutions for a thriving regional economy that are inclusive and globally competitive. 1) advocacy - be a bold advocate for business as a driver of a strong economy that enables…

—
10
Ucla Alumni Association

The mission of the ucla alumni association is to enrich the lives of alumni and involve them in the future of ucla.

Education
11
Los Angeles World Affairs Council and Town Hall

The organization is a non-partisan, membership based speakers' forum that connects business leaders, community members, and engaged individuals with shared interest in local, national, and global affairs. it provides an open and accessible…

International
12
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ucla Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Aajc Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
12/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $155,000 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATIONHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $50,000 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LAASIAN HALL OF FAME: $30,992 · Arts & CultureASIAN HALL OF FAMELOS ANGELES BALLET INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES BALLET INCFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $18,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INCSegerstrom Center for the Arts: $16,500 · Arts & CultureSegerstrom Center for the ArtsCAMERATA PACIFICA: $15,450 · Arts & CultureJ PAUL GETTY MUSEUM: $100,000 · OtherJ PAUL GETTY MUSEUMIndividual grant recipient: $25,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBET TZEDEK: $25,000 · OtherBET TZEDEKFRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFENSE FUND: $25,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFENSE FUNDASIA SOCIETY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $20,300 · OtherASIA SOCIETY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAWALLIS ANNENBERG FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherWALLIS ANNENBERG FOUNDATIONTIKVAH-ETTA AND LAZEAR ISRAEL CENTER FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED: $18,000 · OtherTIKVAH-ETTA AND LAZEAR ISRAEL CENTER…CEDARS-SINAI BOARD OF GOVERNORS: $15,000 · Other+8 more: $52,166 · Other+8 moreTHE HAROLD AND CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION (FKA THE HAROLD PUMP FOUNDATION): $31,000 · HealthTHE HAROLD AND CARO…ALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES: $30,000 · HealthALZHEIMERS GREATER …AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER INC: $25,000 · HealthAMERICAN FRIENDS OF…Children's Hospital Los Angeles: $25,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital…PARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION: $17,862 · HealthPARTNERS IN CARE FO…CURE DUCHENNE: $15,026 · HealthCURE DUCHENNENATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $12,500 · HealthNATIONAL JEWISH HEA…+1 more: $5,181 · HealthDEBBIE ALLEN DANCE INC DEBBIE ALLEN DANCE ACADEMY: $49,500 · EducationDEBBIE AL…UCLA FOUNDATION: $16,000 · EducationUCLA FOUN…ALLIANCE COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $15,000 · EducationALLIANCE …GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION: $30,150 · AnimalsTHE HEART FOUNDATION: $19,500 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE LOS ANGELES DODGERS FOUNDATION: $15,530 · Recreation & Sports
Arts & Culture$305,942Other$300,966Health$161,569Education$80,500Animals$30,150Philanthropy$29,500Recreation & Sports$15,530

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $155,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $50,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDEBBIE ALLEN DANCE INC DEBBIE ALLEN DANCE ACADEMY: $49,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE HAROLD AND CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION (FKA THE HAROLD PUMP FOUNDATION): $31,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetASIAN HALL OF FAME: $30,992 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetGREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION: $30,150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES: $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBET TZEDEK: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES BALLET INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HEART FOUNDATION: $19,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIKVAH-ETTA AND LAZEAR ISRAEL CENTER FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED: $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION: $17,862 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSegerstrom Center for the Arts: $16,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LOS ANGELES DODGERS FOUNDATION: $15,530 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMERATA PACIFICA: $15,450 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCURE DUCHENNE: $15,026 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetALLIANCE COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFARHANG FOUNDATION: $7,510 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMINDS MATTER OF LOS ANGELES INC: $6,214 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - AAJC INC: $5,317 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOLIGO NATION: $5,181 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHP 11-99 FOUNDATION: $5,075 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA19.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Alfred E Mann Charities Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Charities Aid Foundation America · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mann Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mann Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mann Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Mann Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mann’s filings →

    More from the funding graph