Skip to content

· Public charity

Manaus

Manaus is a non-profit fund that works in partnership with others using the principle of community organizing and human-centered design to create sustainable solutions to issues that further equity.

$158k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$355kCivil Rights$345kHousing & Shelter$140kHuman Services$77kArts & Culture$39kCrime & Legal$21kHealth$7kReligion$1k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $120k
$6,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Two Rivers Community School$120,000
Roaring Fork CDC$20,000
Rocky Mountain Early Childhood Conference$6,500
TACAW$6,000
River Bridge Regional Center$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $77k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%La Medichi: $55k → 6%LaMedichi: $14k → 6%LaMedichi: $8k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$488k · 4 repeat orgs$496k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +62% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
8

Total granted

$488k
$484k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+62%

Still filing today

75%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHealthCivil RightsHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    Two Rivers Community School
    4× · 2021–2024 · $206k · revenue +66%
  • RF
    Roaring Fork Community Development Corporation
    2× · 2023–2024 · $140k · revenue -32%
  • FR
    FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF THE ROARING FORK SCHOOLS
    2× · 2021–2022 · $116k

Funded once

  • MV
    Mountain Voices Project
    one grant, 2019 · $329k · revenue -74%
  • TS
    The Savings Collaborative
    one grant, 2021 · $77k · revenue -11%
  • EI
    English in Actiongraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $19k · revenue +349%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fraser Valley Community Media Inc

Fraser Valley Community Media operates community radio stations KFFR 88.3 FM and KWTR 89.1 FM to unite Grand County, Colorado, by broadcasting local music, news, cultural programming, youth education, and civic information.

Arts & Culture
2
Colorado Learning Connections

Through individualized learning and responsive mentoring, we inspire, guide and empower students and families.

Education
3
High Rockies Community School

Our mission is to provide individualized educational options where students and teachers engage in playful, exploratory learning by creating a culture of collaboration in a safe, diverse, multi-age environment. Our students are encouraged…

Education
4
Rogue Climate

Rogue Climate's mission is to empower Southern Oregon communities most impacted by climate change including low-income, rural, youth, seniors & communities of color, to win climate justice by organizing for clean energy, sustainable jobs &…

Education
5
Aspen Valley Land Trust

Protecting the open land and special places of the roaring fork and middle colorado river valleys for wildlife, agriculture, and community forever.

Environment
6
Center for Nonprofit Excellence

The Center for Nonprofit Excellence strengthens Southern Colorado's nonprofit sector through leadership and resource development, advocacy and collaboration. Together, with our partners, we are co-creating a vibrant community in the Pikes…

—
7
Roaring Fork Safe Passages

The RFSP works to improve safety for wildlife crossing Colorado Highway 82, focusing on reducing wildlife-vehicle collisions. The initiative specifically addresses wildlife like elk, mule deer,and other animals that get caught in traffic…

Environment
8
Colorado Press Association

Promote the general interest of daily, weekly, and monthly newspapers and online publications, improve editorials and business methods of daily and weekly newspapers, and advance those newspapers' usefulness and influence in the public…

—
9
Mvp Education Fund

The MVP Education Fund is a broad-based organization along Colorados Western Slope. MVP is comprised of local institutions, including but not limited to, congregations, educational organizations non-profits, and neighborhood organizations…

Community Improvement
10
Rocky Mountain Land Library

To help people connect to nature and the land.

Environment
11
Boulder Watershed Collective

The Boulder Watershed Collective is a 501c3 non-profit stakeholder-driven organization established to address forested watershed health,resiliency and stewardship. We have three program areas: ClimateAdaptation and Resilience Watershed…

Environment
12
The Pinon Project

The Pinon Project Family Resource Center strengthens our community by providing comprehensive services for children and families.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Roaring Fork Public Radio Inc; the most unlike its peers is Children's Hospital Colorado. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Mountain Voices Project: $328,510 · Civil RightsMountain Voices ProjectTwo Rivers Community School: $205,778 · EducationTwo Rivers Community Scho…English in Action: $19,000 · EducationEnglish in ActionFAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF THE ROARING FORK SCHOOLS: $115,500 · OtherFAMILY RESOURCE C…ROARING FORK PUBLIC RADIO INC: $16,290 · OtherROARING FORK PUBL…COMPASS FOR LIFELONG DISCOVERY: $15,000 · OtherCOMPASS FOR LIFEL…+1 more: $1,000 · OtherRoaring Fork Community Development Corporation: $140,000 · Community ImprovementRoaring Fork Com…The Savings Collaborative: $76,739 · Human ServicesTHE ARTS CAMPUS AT WILLITS: $26,381 · Arts & CultureTHE SOPRIS SUN INC: $12,500 · Arts & CultureALPINE LEGAL SERVICES INC: $15,000 · Crime & LegalChildren's Hospital Colorado: $6,500 · HealthRIVER BRIDGE REGIONAL CENTER INC: $5,500 · Health
Civil Rights$328,510Education$224,778Other$147,790Community Improvement$140,000Human Services$76,739Arts & Culture$38,881Crime & Legal$15,000Health$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTwo Rivers Community School: $205,778 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetRoaring Fork Community Development Corporation: $140,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetThe Savings Collaborative: $76,739 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetTHE ARTS CAMPUS AT WILLITS: $26,381 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetROARING FORK PUBLIC RADIO INC: $16,290 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetALPINE LEGAL SERVICES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCOMPASS FOR LIFELONG DISCOVERY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SOPRIS SUN INC: $12,500 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIVER BRIDGE REGIONAL CENTER INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Aspen Community FoundationCO26× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Aspen Community Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Thrift Shop · Western Colorado Community Foundation Inc · Rose Community Foundation · The Magnolia Charitable Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · Gates Family Foundation · The Fullerton Family Charitable Fund · The North Star Charitable Foundation · Castaways Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Manaus funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Manaus. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Manaus?

    Find your warmest path to Manaus through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Manaus’ filings →

    More from the funding graph