Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The North Star Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15M
Granted FY2024still arriving
56
Grants FY2024still arriving
17
States reached
$4.0M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$16MEducation$14MEnvironment$4.9MFood & Nutrition$2.8MHuman Services$2.2MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.2MAnimals$1.1MInternational$857kOther$0
02FY2024 · 56 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $297k
  • $50k–250k27 grants · $2.1M
  • $250k+14 grants · $13M
$75,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION$4,000,000
THE COLORADO COLLEGE$1,559,000
Individual grant recipient$1,250,000
CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK$1,100,000
FEEL GOOD ACTION$1,000,000
SEATTLE AQUARIUM SOCIETY$801,000
CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL$570,000
MALALA FUND$550,000
UNITED SERVICES ORGANIZATION (USO)$500,000
NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE$350,000
EVERYBODY MATTERS$300,000
ARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL$276,596
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE ROARING FORK$250,000
CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY$250,000
NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM$200,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE: $350k → 16%THE NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL: $150k → 16%MAMATOTO VILLAGE: $100k → 14%MAMATOTO VILLAGE: $50k → 14%MAMATOTO VILLAGE: $30k → 14%EVERYBODY MATTERS: $50k → 11%EVERYBODY MATTERS: $300k → 11%EVERYBODY MATTERS: $300k → 11%SILVER SPRING VILLAGE: $2k → 8%EVERYBODY MATTERS: $300k → 11%EVERYBODY MATTERS: $185k → 11%EVERYBODY MATTERS: $150k → 11%EVERYBODY MATTERS: $140k → 11%FAMILY LAW CASA OF KING COUNTY: $200k → 9%FAMILY LAW CASA OF KING COUNTY: $100k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
WY
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$44M · 52 repeat orgs$4.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

52 repeat relationships — 37 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

52
24

Total granted

$44M
$679k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+11%

Still filing today

79%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationEnvironmentArts & CultureFood & NutritionHuman ServicesHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $16M · revenue +12%
  • TC
    THE COLORADO COLLEGE
    7× · 2017–2024 · $4.6M · revenue +39%
  • EW
    EMMA WILLARD SCHOOL
    5× · 2018–2023 · $4.3M · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • BB
    BUILDING BRIDGES ACROSS THE RIVER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +40%
  • NJ
    NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • SA
    SEATTLE ART MUSEUMgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +28%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
3
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
6
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
7
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
8
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
9
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
10
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
11
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
12
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Aspen Institute Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pedigree Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFood Banks and PantriesCommunity FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Christian Missionary Organi…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Local Food System Organizat…Policy Research and AdvocacyChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Affordable Housing Developm…United Way AffiliatesCommunity College Foundatio…Pregnancy Support ServicesLocal History MuseumsOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Cancer Support ServicesSenior Support ServicesIndependent K-12 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%3%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%42%20–35yr13%19%35–55yr16%28%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/71
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,494

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

69 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 69 of the 95 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
68/69
Grantees still filing
42/69
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $16,025,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERI…+3 more — $155,000 · HealthTHE COLORADO COLLEGE — $4,580,355 · EducationTHE COLORADO COLLEGEEMMA WILLARD SCHOOL — $4,250,000 · EducationEMMA WILLARD SCHOOLTHE MALALA FUND — $1,175,000 · EducationTHE MALALA FUNDCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $800,000 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY+14 more — $2,675,000 · Education+14 moreIndividual grant recipient — $1,250,000 · OtherIndividual grant …UNITED SERVICES ORGANIZATION (USO) — $1,170,000 · OtherUNITED SERVICES O…NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM — $400,000 · OtherAMERICAN UNIVERSITY WAMU — $300,000 · OtherCOLLEGE OF WILLIAM & MARY — $290,000 · OtherINTERFAITH WORKS OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC — $255,000 · OtherAMIGOS OF COSTA RICA INC — $367,000 · OtherALIGHT — $270,000 · OtherARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC — $276,596 · Other+45 more — $3,042,979 · Other+45 moreCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $2,170,000 · EnvironmentCONSERVATIO…Feel Good Action — $1,000,000 · EnvironmentFeel Good A…WILDERNESS INQUIRY INC — $720,000 · EnvironmentWILDERNESS …MONTANA WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION — $380,000 · EnvironmentMONTANA WIL…NATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL — $375,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL OU…WILD MONTANA ACTION FUND — $200,000 · Environment+1 more — $50,000 · EnvironmentEVERYBODY MATTERS INC — $1,424,625 · Human ServicesTHE NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE INC — $500,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY LAW CASA OF KING COUNTY — $300,000 · Human ServicesMAMATOTO VILLAGE INC — $180,000 · Human Services+1 more — $2,000 · Human ServicesCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $2,150,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC — $175,000 · Food & Nutrition+4 more — $60,000 · Food & NutritionTHE SEATTLE AQUARIUM SOCIETY — $1,051,000 · Animals
Health$16,180,000Education$13,480,355Other$7,621,575Environment$4,895,000Human Services$2,406,625Food & Nutrition$2,385,000Animals$1,051,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $16,025,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetTHE COLORADO COLLEGE — $4,580,355 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetEMMA WILLARD SCHOOL — $4,250,000 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $2,170,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $2,150,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetEVERYBODY MATTERS INC — $1,424,625 over 7y, 41% of budgetTHE MALALA FUND — $1,175,000 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetTHE SEATTLE AQUARIUM SOCIETY — $1,051,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetFeel Good Action — $1,000,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $800,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWILDERNESS INQUIRY INC — $720,000 over 7y, 4.5% of budgetTHE NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE INC — $500,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM — $400,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL — $400,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMONTANA WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION — $380,000 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetNATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL — $375,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetAMIGOS OF COSTA RICA INC — $367,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetHOMEFRONT INC — $360,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCOLORADO ROCKY MOUNTAIN SCHOOL INC — $350,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetBARD COLLEGE — $325,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY LAW CASA OF KING COUNTY — $300,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetScholarCHIPS Inc — $295,000 over 6y, 29% of budgetGENERATION HOPE — $280,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC — $276,596 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetALIGHT — $270,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $250,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BAIL PROJECT INC — $250,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetWILD MONTANA ACTION FUND — $200,000 over 2y, 68% of budgetWilliam & Mary Foundation — $200,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY — $200,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTREEHOUSE — $200,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMAMATOTO VILLAGE INC — $180,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC — $175,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMONTGOMERY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $175,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetPLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES — $170,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE URBAN ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBUILDING BRIDGES ACROSS THE RIVER INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCenter for Human Services — $100,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSEATTLE ART MUSEUM — $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVALLEY SETTLEMENT — $100,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetSolid Ground Washington — $95,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPEACEJAM FOUNDATION — $80,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetREPROHUB — $75,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTEPPING STONES OF THE ROARING FORK VALLEY — $50,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES — $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPITT HOPKINS RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COLORADO COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds EMMA WILLARD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds EVERYBODY MATTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MALALA FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE SEATTLE AQUARIUM SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Feel Good Action ↗
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WILDERNESS INQUIRY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
  • Who funds THE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds AMIGOS OF COSTA RICA INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMEFRONT INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO ROCKY MOUNTAIN SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds BARD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY LAW CASA OF KING COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds ScholarCHIPS Inc ↗
  • Who funds GENERATION HOPE ↗
  • Who funds ARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ALIGHT ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BAIL PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds WILD MONTANA ACTION FUND ↗
  • Who funds William & Mary Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds TREEHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds MAMATOTO VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Aspen Community Found…Colorado Gives Founda…The Morris and Gwendo…Seattle FoundationThe Thrift ShopGates Family Foundati…Rose Community Founda…El Pomar FoundationManausThe Magnolia Charitab…The Thendara Foundati…The Denver Foundation
Aspen Community FoundationCO19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Aspen Community Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Seattle Foundation · The Thrift Shop · Gates Family Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Manaus · The Magnolia Charitable Foundation · The Thendara Foundation · The Denver Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The North Star Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Homefront Inc — 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The North Star Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The North Star Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 95 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines