Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Magnolia Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$131k
Granted FY2024still arriving
48
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$265kHuman Services$142kHealth$137kArts & Culture$110kCommunity Improvement$66kAnimals$49kHousing & Shelter$47kInternational$38kOther$0
02FY2024 · 48 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k46 grants · $106k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$2,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ENGLISH IN ACTION$15,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC$10,000
SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC$5,000
CARRY THE LOAD$5,000
RANDOLPH COLLEGE$5,000
AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL INC$5,000
BORDER PARTNERS$5,000
FREEDOM RANCH INC$5,000
ANNUNCIATION HOUSE INC$5,000
LENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTER CORPORATION$5,000
A CHANCE TO CHANGE FOUNDATION$5,000
YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OKLAHOMA CIT$4,000
OKLAHOMA GUARDIAN AD LITEM INSTITUTE$4,000
ANGEL S FOSTER FAMILY NETWORK OKC INC$4,000
PEPPERS RANCH INC$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $130k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SAVANNAH STATION THERAPEUTIC RIDING PROGRAM INC: $5k → 9%PEPPERS RANCH INC: $3k → 12%FOUNDATION FOR EXCEPTIONAL WARRIORS INC: $1k → 18%BETHLEHEM HOUSE INC: $2k → 15%AHAL INC: $3k → 11%PEPPERS RANCH INC: $2k → 12%AHAL INC: $5k → 11%PEPPERS RANCH INC: $2k → 12%JOHN 3 16 MISSION: $1k → 14%FOUNDATION FOR EXCEPTIONAL WARRIORS INC: $2k → 15%FOOD DEPOT: $2k → 12%FOUNDATION FOR EXCEPTIONAL WARRIORS INC: $1k → 15%SUPPORT A SOLDIER CLEARINGHOUSE: $5k → 12%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $2k → 10%SUPPORT A SOLDIER CLEARINGHOUSE: $5k → 12%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $2k → 10%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $2k → 14%SUPPORT A SOLDIER CLEARINGHOUSE: $5k → 12%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $2k → 14%SUPPORT A SOLDIER CLEARINGHOUSE: $2k → 12%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $2k → 14%ENDING COMMUNITY HOMELESSNESS COALITION INC: $2k → 10%ENDING COMMUNITY HOMELESSNESS COALITION INC: $2k → 10%CALM WATERS CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $2k → 16%CALM WATERS CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $2k → 16%CALM WATERS CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $2k → 16%CALM WATERS CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $1k → 16%CALM WATERS CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $1k → 16%YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OKLAHOMA CIT: $10k → 16%YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OKLAHOMA CIT: $5k → 16%YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OKLAHOMA CIT: $5k → 16%YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OKLAHOMA CIT: $4k → 16%YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OKLAHOMA CIT: $3k → 16%HUGS PROJECT INCORPORATED: $2k → 16%HUGS PROJECT INCORPORATED: $1k → 16%ANGEL S FOSTER FAMILY NETWORK OKC INC: $4k → 16%TO BY FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $5k → 16%PIVOT INC: $3k → 16%PIVOT INC: $3k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $2k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $2k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $2k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $1k → 16%HALO PROJECT INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $4k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $1k → 16%OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION FOR THE DISABLED INC: $1k → 16%LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY INC: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
MN
IL
NY
WY
PA
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
NC
DC
HI
OK
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$909k · 82 repeat orgs$213k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

82 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2024, 51 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

82
80

Total granted

$909k
$166k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+20%

Still filing today

85%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationAnimalsYouth DevelopmentHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RANDOLPH COLLEGE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $121k · revenue +0%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $63k · revenue +40%
  • UI
    URBAN INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $55k · revenue +10% · 39% of their budget

Funded once

  • AO
    ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • LI
    LIFE INTER FAITH TEAM ON UNEMPLOYMENT AND POVERTY
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue -17%
  • DIRECT RELIEF
    one grant, 2020 · $7k · revenue +20%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc

United way of central oklahoma is committed to connecting people and resources to improve the well being of those in our community.

Philanthropy
2
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
3
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
4
Life International

To partner with leaders globally to boldly proclaim the biblical truth of the father's heart for life, champion the gospel of jesus christ, and establish life-giving ministries.

Health
5
Oklahoma Casa Association Inc

To provide a statewide voice for children by enhancing & sustaining the growth of local casa programs which provide trained community volunteers to represent the best interests of abused & neglected children.

Human Services
6
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
7
Opportunity Partners

Mission: together we advance the quality of life for people with disabilities. vision: people of all abilities thrive in the world. values: impact- generate solutions that make a difference. choice - create opportunities for people to lead…

Employment
8
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
9
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
10
Casa of Southern Oklahoma Inc

Solicit, train & direct activities of court-appointed volunteer advocates for children in cases involving child abuse and neglect. assist in direct expense needs of individual children in court-appointed cases.

Civil Rights
11
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
12
Oklahoma Hall of Fame

The oklahoma hall of fame preserves oklahomas unique history while promoting pride in our great state through each of its programs and the gaylord-pickens museum. the association honors our states rich tradition by telling oklahomas story…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leadership Oklahoma City Inc and the most unlike its peers is Aspen Equestrian Team. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPregnancy Support ServicesAnimal Rescue and ShelterSchool District FoundationsMilitary Veterans SupportYouth Development ServicesEquine Therapy ProgramsFood Banks and PantriesImmigrant Worker SupportCommunity Food PantriesYouth Sports ProgramsEnvironmental Conservation …Women & Girls Leadership De…Affordable Housing Developm…Elementary Literacy TutoringAffordable Housing Construc…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Developmental Disabilities …Health Access Advocacy and …Community Arts CentersYouth Development CentersPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%38%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%2/173
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,392

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

156 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 156 of the 184 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
49
Early backer (in before they grew)
152/156
Grantees still filing
114/156
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RANDOLPH COLLEGE INC — $120,500 · EducationRANDOLPH COLLEGE INCURBAN INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $55,000 · EducationURBAN INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT …UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC — $42,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDA…VALLEY SETTLEMENT — $23,500 · EducationVALLEY SETTLEMENTEnglish in Action — $18,000 · EducationEnglish in ActionOklahoma State University Foundation — $16,000 · EducationOklahoma State University Fou…OKLAHOMA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC — $12,000 · Education+6 more — $11,000 · EducationROARING FORK PUBLIC RADIO INC — $18,000 · OtherA CHANCE TO CHANGE FOUNDATION — $15,000 · OtherInternational Rescue Committee INC — $15,000 · OtherTHE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC — $22,500 · OtherTHE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INCASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES — $21,000 · OtherTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $18,500 · Other+95 more — $311,700 · Other+95 moreYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OKLAHOMA CI — $27,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMENS C…SUPPORT A SOLDIER CLEARINGHOUSE INC — $17,000 · Human ServicesSUPPORT A SOLD…INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC — $12,500 · Human ServicesINFANT CRISIS …PEPPERS RANCH INC — $11,500 · Human ServicesPEPPERS RANCH …AHAL INC — $7,500 · Human ServicesTHE CHRISTMAS CONNECTION INC — $7,000 · Human ServicesCALM WATERS CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC — $6,500 · Human ServicesHalo Project International Foundation — $6,000 · Human ServicesPIVOT INC — $6,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $6,000 · Human ServicesSavannah Station TRP Incorporation — $5,000 · Human ServicesLATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY INC — $5,000 · Human Services+13 more — $29,500 · Human Services+13 moreNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC — $36,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL …ROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC — $14,500 · Arts & CultureROCKY MOU…FRIENDS OF OETA INC — $7,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS O…THE ARTS CAMPUS AT WILLITS — $5,000 · Arts & CultureOKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY ARTS CENTER INC — $5,000 · Arts & CultureThe Z Space Studio — $4,500 · Arts & CultureThe Art Base — $4,500 · Arts & CultureMINDPOP — $4,000 · Arts & Culture+8 more — $13,450 · Arts & Culture+8 morePLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $62,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $10,000 · HealthSKRABAN-DEARDORFF SYNDROME FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Health+6 more — $8,000 · HealthASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $14,500 · PhilanthropyHealthy All Together — $12,500 · PhilanthropyCARRY THE LOAD — $10,000 · PhilanthropyLENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTER — $5,000 · Philanthropy22KILL — $5,000 · Philanthropy+3 more — $3,000 · PhilanthropySECOND CHANCE ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC — $11,000 · AnimalsFREE TO LIVE INC — $11,000 · AnimalsOKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY — $5,500 · AnimalsANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE — $5,000 · AnimalsFRIENDS WITH FOUR PAWS INC — $4,500 · AnimalsTHE PET FOOD PANTRY OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC — $4,000 · Animals+6 more — $6,000 · Animals
Education$298,000Other$421,700Human Services$146,500Arts & Culture$93,950Health$85,500Philanthropy$50,000Animals$47,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRANDOLPH COLLEGE INC — $120,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $62,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $55,000 over 2y, 39% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC — $42,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC — $36,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OKLAHOMA CI — $27,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetVALLEY SETTLEMENT — $23,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC — $22,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES — $21,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $18,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEnglish in Action — $18,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetROARING FORK PUBLIC RADIO INC — $18,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSUPPORT A SOLDIER CLEARINGHOUSE INC — $17,000 over 4y, 23% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation — $16,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetA CHANCE TO CHANGE FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC — $14,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $14,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetINFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC — $12,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHealthy All Together — $12,500 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC — $12,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE REDBUD FOUNDATION INC — $12,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetPEPPERS RANCH INC — $11,500 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetSECOND CHANCE ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC — $11,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetFREE TO LIVE INC — $11,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER INC — $11,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC — $10,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCARRY THE LOAD — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC — $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE INTER FAITH TEAM ON UNEMPLOYMENT AND POVERTY — $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAHAL INC — $7,500 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF OETA INC — $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSANTAS CAUSE INC — $7,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetTHE CHRISTMAS CONNECTION INC — $7,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF — $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC — $6,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetREMERGE INC — $6,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCALM WATERS CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC — $6,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMOUNT SOPRIS NORDIC COUNCIL INC — $6,400 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetHalo Project International Foundation — $6,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetPIVOT INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC — $5,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY — $5,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ARTS CAMPUS AT WILLITS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY ARTS CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFREEDOM RANCH INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

El and Thelma Gaylord…Oklahoma City Communi…American Fidelity Fou…Communities Foundatio…Inasmuch FoundationCresap Family Foundat…Harris Foundation IncLove Meyer Family Fou…The Merrick FoundationThe Anne and Henry Za…Fred Jones Family Fou…Sarkeys Foundation
El and Thelma Gaylord FoundationOK70.9× affinity33 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · American Fidelity Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Inasmuch Foundation · Cresap Family Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc · Love Meyer Family Foundation · The Merrick Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Fred Jones Family Foundation · Sarkeys Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Magnolia Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 420%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Big Brothers Big Sisters of America — 21% of income from government
  • Oklahoma City Family Justice Center Inc — 14% of income from government
  • Variety Care Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Remerge Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Pivot Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Oklahoma Arts Institute Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
42get no government money at all
51report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Magnolia Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Magnolia Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 184 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines