· Community foundation
Western Colorado Community Foundation Inc
Western colorado community foundation amplifies the generosity in our communities by providing leadership, connections, and resources to meet the ever-evolving needs of our western colorado home.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 194 grants below total $8,018,883 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $9,536,053 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,517,170 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k40 grants · $273k
- $10k–50k122 grants · $2.4M
- $50k–250k24 grants · $2.1M
- $250k+8 grants · $3.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HILLTOP COMMUNITY RESOURCES | $538,445 |
| PRIMEHEALTH | $446,819 |
| HOMEWARDBOUND OF THE GRAND VALLEY | $435,590 |
| GRAND VALLEY CATHOLIC OUTREACH | $401,081 |
| MESA COUNTY PARTNERS | $391,606 |
| HOPEWEST | $368,009 |
| ROICE HURST HUMANE SOCIETY | $345,260 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MESA COUNTY | $343,480 |
| COLORADO WEST LAND TRUST - GRAND JUNCTION | $242,413 |
| COMMUNITY FOOD BANK | $159,500 |
| RIVERSIDE EDUCATION CENTERS | $136,000 |
| HOLY FAMILY SCHOOL | $125,810 |
| CITY OF GRAND JUNCTION - POLICE DEPARTMENT | $101,827 |
| WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT | $100,000 |
| GRAND JUNCTION SYMPHONY FOUNDATION | $85,250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $6.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 7% of Western Colorado Community Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 96% of the giving stays in CO; read by stated purpose it is 90% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
206 repeat relationships — 141 still active in FY2025, 65 since wound down; 43 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $768k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GVGRAND VALLEY CATHOLIC OUTREACH INC9× · 2017–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +56%
- MCMARILLAC CLINIC INC9× · 2017–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +100%
- HHHILLTOP HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION9× · 2017–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +34%
Funded once
- CSCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2019 · $139k
- GBGJ BLACKOUTone grant, 2024 · $101k · revenue -2%
- GJGRAND JUNCTION HOUSING AUTHORITYone grant, 2024 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…
AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…
Colorado Thrives exists to support Coloradans to achieve economic mobility through access to good jobs.
To empower visitors and locals to explore, learn about and protect the spectacular public lands of Southwest Colorado.
The mission of the Colorado Wildlife Heritage Foundation is to provide a legacy for Colorado through support of environmental stewardship conservation of wildlife and the protection of critical habitat.
Healthier colorado is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to raising the voices of coloradans in the public policy process to improve the health of our state's residents. we believe that every coloradan should have a fair…
The Boulder Watershed Collective is a 501c3 non-profit stakeholder-driven organization established to address forested watershed health,resiliency and stewardship. We have three program areas: ClimateAdaptation and Resilience Watershed…
Increases resilience to wildfire in Delta, Gunnison, Hinsdale, Montrose, Ouray and San Miguel Counties in Colorado
Promote the general interest of daily, weekly, and monthly newspapers and online publications, improve editorials and business methods of daily and weekly newspapers, and advance those newspapers' usefulness and influence in the public…
Works with farmers and ranchers to address water issues around the state impacting agriculture.
The mission of the grand junction economic partnership is to generate high quality economic development by attracting business and quality jobs to mesa county, colorado.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Conservation Colorado Education Fund and the most unlike its peers is Mark & Kathryn Ford Family Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
291 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 291 of the 392 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GRAND VALLEY CATHOLIC OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds MARILLAC CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds HILLTOP HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds HOMEWARD BOUND OF THE GRAND VALLEY ↗
- Who funds HopeWest ↗
- Who funds MESA YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds ROICE-HURST HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MESA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds RIVERSIDE EDUCATIONAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds ST MARY'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COLORADO MESA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MESA COUNTY LAND CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds COLORADO NORTHWESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KARIS INC ↗
- Who funds LIFE INTER FAITH TEAM ON UNEMPLOYMENT AND POVERTY ↗
- Who funds JOSEPH CENTER ↗
- Who funds EUREKA MCCONNELL SCIENCE MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds MESA DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds CASA OF THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ROARING FORK ↗
- Who funds LA PLAZA ↗
- Who funds KIDS AID KIDS AID ↗
- Who funds YOUTHZONE INC ↗
- Who funds MESA COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Clifton Christian Church Food Bank ↗
- Who funds HARMONY ACRES EQUESTRIAN CENTER ↗
- Who funds HOUSING RESOURCES OF WESTERN COLORADO ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR ENRICHED COMMUNICATION ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds GRAND JUNCTION SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds GRAND JUNCTION SYMPHONY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Confluence Center of Colorado Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · The Goodwin Foundation · Gates Family Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Aspen Community Foundation · Bacon Family Foundation · The Colorado Trust · International Association of Lions 3602 · Caring for Colorado Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Western Colorado Community Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Shriners' Hospital for Children — 6% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.