Skip to content
Makahakama Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Makahakama Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$530k
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Environment$848kCommunity Improvement$176kInternational$40kHuman Services$40kEducation$35kPhilanthropy$35kArts & Culture$28kYouth Development$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $64k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $106k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$19M
Total assets

Anchored by a single position: about 91% of reported assets are held in Bill Com Holdings.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Lahaina Community Land Trust$300,000
The Nature Conservancy$60,000
The Acceleration Project$36,000
Hawaiian Islands Land Trust$20,000
African Diaspora Network$20,000
Ayudando Latinos a Sonar$10,000
Teach For America Bay Area$10,000
Peninsula Open Space Trust$10,000
The Audacity Performing Arts Project Inc$5,000
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley$5,000
The Trust for Hidden Villa$5,000
Earth Island Institute$5,000
Immigrant Legal Resource Center$5,000
LifeMoves$5,000
Boys & Girls Clubs of the Peninsula$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Korean American Community Foundation of San Franci: $3k → 10%Korean American Community Foundation of San Franci: $3k → 10%Immigrant Legal Resource Center: $5k → 10%Ayudando Latinos a Sonar: $30k → 7%Immigrant Legal Resource Center: $5k → 10%Ayudando Latinos a Sonar: $10k → 7%Climate Resilient Communities: $5k → 8%Working Solutions CDFI: $10k → 10%Climate Resilient Communities: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

25%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$213k · 16 repeat orgs$636k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +8% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
10

Total granted

$213k
$268k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
-5%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $369k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
EnvironmentCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    ALAS AYUDANDO LATINOS A SONAR
    2× · 2023–2024 · $40k · revenue +80%
  • PO
    PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST
    2× · 2023–2024 · $15k · revenue +152%
  • TD
    TRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +267%

Funded once

  • VV
    VIDA VERDE NATURE EDUCATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +94%
  • HC
    HAWAII COMMUNITY LENDINGgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +178%
  • RE
    RAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Santa Cruz Local Inc

Independent nonpartisan newsroom serving Santa Cruz County, California we are all watching and engaged in our local government, our needs are addressed, democracy works better and our community is stronger.

—
2
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
3
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
4
Silicon Valley Rising Action

Silicon Valley Rising Action takes on occupational segregation and income inequality with a comprehensive campaign to raise wages, create affordable housing, and build a tech economy that works for everyone.

—
5
Silicon Valley Social Venture Fund - SV2

Silicon Valley Social Venture Funds (SV2) mission is to unleash the talents and resources of the Bay Area community to achieve meaningful social impact. SV2 works to build the organizational capacity of our Nonprofit Grantees and Impact…

Philanthropy
6
Asian Law Caucus

The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…

Crime & Legal
7
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
8
Active San Gabriel Valley

Active San Gabriel Valley (ActiveSGV) is a community-based environmental advocacy and public health non-profit organization. Our mission is to promote a more sustainable, equitable, and livable San Gabriel Valley.

Community Improvement
9
Los Altos Chamber of Commerce

To encourage and promote businesses and to stimulate a vibrant economy in los altos and los altos hills.

—
10
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
11
Unitedly

Unitedly is a nonprofit organization based in San Mateo County, California. Unitedly was established to ensure Asian families and communities have access to equitable opportunities and resources to thrive in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Human Services
12
California Coastkeeper dba California Coastkeeper Alliance

California Coastkeeper Alliance unites Waterkeeper programs statewide to fight for swimmable, fishable, and drinkable waters for all Californians.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pacific Community Ventures Inc; the most unlike its peers is Alas Ayudando Latinos a Sonar. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
18/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $367,500 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION+11 more: $73,000 · Other+11 moreLAHAINA COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $300,000 · Housing & ShelterLAHAINA COMMUNITY LAND TRUS…VIDA VERDE NATURE EDUCATION: $100,000 · EnvironmentVIDA VERDE NATU…HAWAIIAN ISLANDS LAND TRUST: $20,000 · EnvironmentHAWAIIAN ISLAND…PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST: $15,000 · EnvironmentPENINSULA OPEN …TRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST: $10,000 · EnvironmentTRUCKEE DONNER …ELEMENTAL EXCELERATOR INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentELEMENTAL EXCEL…+3 more: $15,000 · Environment+3 moreHAWAII COMMUNITY LENDING: $100,000 · Community ImprovementHAWAII COMMUNIT…THE ACCELERATION PROJECT INC: $36,000 · Community ImprovementTHE ACCELERATIO…PACIFIC COMMUNITY VENTURES INC: $10,000 · Community ImprovementPACIFIC COMMUNI…LA COCINA: $10,000 · Community ImprovementLA COCINARenaissance Entrepreneurship Center: $10,000 · Community ImprovementRenaissance Ent…ALAS AYUDANDO LATINOS A SONAR: $40,000 · Human ServicesIMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER: $10,000 · Human ServicesWORKING SOLUTIONS CDFI: $10,000 · Human ServicesClimate Resilient Communities: $10,000 · Human ServicesKOREAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $5,000 · Human ServicesAfrican Diaspora Network: $40,000 · InternationalTeach for America Inc: $20,000 · EducationRAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationSilicon Valley Urban Debate League: $5,000 · Education
Other$465,500Housing & Shelter$300,000Environment$170,000Community Improvement$166,000Human Services$75,000International$40,000Education$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $367,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAHAINA COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $300,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetVIDA VERDE NATURE EDUCATION: $100,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY LENDING: $100,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAfrican Diaspora Network: $40,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetALAS AYUDANDO LATINOS A SONAR: $40,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE ACCELERATION PROJECT INC: $36,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAIIAN ISLANDS LAND TRUST: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetIMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetELEMENTAL EXCELERATOR INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUDACITY PERFORMING ARTS PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIFEMOVES: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC COMMUNITY VENTURES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORKING SOLUTIONS CDFI: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLA COCINA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetClimate Resilient Communities: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRenaissance Entrepreneurship Center: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSan Jose Jazz: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKOREAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEarth Island Institute Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSilicon Valley Urban Debate League: $5,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetEPACENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTRUST FOR HIDDEN VILLA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBig Sur Land Trust: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChopsticks Alley Art: $4,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSan Jose Taiko Group Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKITCHEN TABLE ADVISORS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLAAD INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Commun…The David and Lucile …The San Francisco Fou…The Sobrato Family Fo…The Palo Alto Communi…Marin Community Found…Philanthropic Venture…Tides FoundationSand Hill FoundationAtkinson FoundationGs Donor Advised Phil…East Bay Community Fo…
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA33.8× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · The Sobrato Family Foundation · The Palo Alto Community Fund · Marin Community Foundation · Philanthropic Ventures Foundation · Tides Foundation · Sand Hill Foundation · Atkinson Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · East Bay Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Makahakama Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Makahakama Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Makahakama’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home