· Public charity
Maine Womens Fund
The maine women's fund makes bold investments that transform the lives of maine women and girls by incubating and investing in nonprofit organizations, partnering with grantees, and connecting people and organizations making social change.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2021.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 16 grants below total $210,908 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $220,908 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $10,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2021
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $142k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $61k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WABANAKI HLTH & WELLNESS | $61,408 |
| MANO EN MANO | $12,000 |
| IMMIGRANT LEGAL ADVOCACY PROJ | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| FOUR DIRECTIONS DEVELOPMENT | $10,000 |
| IN HER PRESENCE | $10,000 |
| SOMAI BANTU COMMUNITY ASSOC | $10,000 |
| NEW VENTURES MAINE | $10,000 |
| THE YWCA OF CENTRAL MAINE | $10,000 |
| RESTORATIVE JUSTICE INST | $10,000 |
| ELDER ABUSE INSTITUTE OF ME | $10,000 |
| MABEL WADSWORTH WOMENS HEALT | $10,000 |
| ME COALITION TO END DOMESTIC | $10,000 |
| MAINE TRANSGENDER NETWORK | $10,000 |
| MAINE WOMENS LOBBY EDUCATION | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–21, $61k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +103% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2021, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WHWABANAKI HEALTH & WELLNESS NPC2× · 2020–2021 · $113k · revenue +239%
- MWMABEL WADSWORTH WOMEN'S HEALTH CTR4× · 2017–2021 · $40k · revenue +103%
- MCMAINE COALITION TO END DOMESTIC VIOLENCE2× · 2020–2021 · $39k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- WWWABANAKI WOMENS COALITION INCone grant, 2020 · $17k · revenue -18%
- MCMAINE COMMUNITY INTEGRATIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +427%
- HGHARDY GIRLS HEALTHY WOMEN INCone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +21%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We support the self-determination of Wabanaki People through Education, Truth-Telling, Restorative Justice, and Restorative Practices in Wabanaki and Maine communities. We design out structures and processes to be responsive to Wabanaki…
To recognize the resiliency of people who use drugs and to work in collaboration to create access points for overdose prevention and harm reduction services in Maine.
This is a women-led nonprofit organization that supports formerly incarcerated and system-impacted women in Maine through education, reentry services, and economic mobility programming. Also, to provide direct assistance, peer support,…
EqualityMaine works to protect and advance full equality for all lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer Mainers by creating an inclusive and intersectional movement through political action, community building, education,…
Maine Equal Justice is a nonprofit legal aid and economic justice organization working to increase economic security, opportunity and equity for people in Maine.
MCAN catalyzes transformative education and action in response to the climate crisis. We seek to honor, unite and amplify the voices of youth, frontline communities, and others historically excluded from the climate conversation and…
The Down East Aids Network and the Health Equity Alliance empowers marginalized communities to improve their health and wellbeing and affect social and cultural change by facilitating collaboration, education, advocacy, and action
MANA is an immigrant-led organization that promotes social & personal empowerment of immigrants in Maine through raising awareness of individual and collective trauma and how they affect our lives, expanding people's resilience building…
To build a permanent and powerful progressive movement in Maine. We will promote a healthy, just, equitable democracy through research, engagement, and education of Maine's citizens. We will engage in democracy expansion, voter engagement,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maine Coalition Against Sexual Assault and the most unlike its peers is Speak About It. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 8% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WABANAKI HEALTH & WELLNESS NPC ↗
- Who funds MABEL WADSWORTH WOMEN'S HEALTH CTR ↗
- Who funds MAINE COALITION TO END DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds Four Directions Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds IMMIGRANT LEGAL ADVOCACY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds YWCA Central Maine ↗
- Who funds ARTVAN ↗
- Who funds A Company of Girls ↗
- Who funds TREE STREET YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds Hand in Hand Mano en Mano ↗
- Who funds MAINE TRANSGENDER NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds ELDER ABUSE INSTITUTE OF MAINE ↗
- Who funds League of Women Voters of Maine Education Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds MAINE COALITION AGAINST SEXUAL ASSAULT ↗
- Who funds In Her Presence ↗
- Who funds GEDAKINA INC ↗
- Who funds WABANAKI WOMENS COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds WAYFINDER SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds MAINE COMMUNITY INTEGRATION ↗
- Who funds HARDY GIRLS HEALTHY WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds MAINE WOMEN'S LOBBY EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds RESTORATIVE JUSTICE INSTITUTE OF MAINE ↗
- Who funds EqualityMaine Foundation ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF MAINE INC ↗
- Who funds OASIS HEALTH NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds SUNRISE COUNTY ECONOMIC COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Maine Council on Aging ↗
- Who funds SPEAK ABOUT IT ↗
- Who funds MAINE CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND ARAB AMERICAN ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds Spurwink Services Inc ↗
- Who funds MAINE INSIDE OUT ↗
- Who funds Safe Voices ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Elmina B Sewall Foundation · John T Gorman Foundation · Maine Health Access Foundation Inc · Maine Initiativesinc · Onion Foundation · Sam L Cohen Foundation · Stephen & Tabitha King Foundation Inc · Albert B Glickman Family Foundation · Davis Family Foundation · United Way Inc · Fisher Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Maine Womens Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Maine Womens Fund?
Find your warmest path to Maine Womens Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.