Skip to content
Madigan Edward Fdn Tuw at a glance

· Private foundation

Madigan Edward Fdn Tuw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$150k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$123kHuman Services$117kYouth Development$110kEducation$108kCommunity Improvement$29kInternational$20kHousing & Shelter$15kArts & Culture$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $80k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $70k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SUN VALLEY YOUTH CENTER INC$10,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF PUEBLO COUNTY$10,000
THE EXODUS ROAD$10,000
LABORATORY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING$10,000
GROWE FOUNDATION$10,000
MINDS MATTER COLORADO$10,000
MOTHER HOUSE INC$10,000
HEART & HAND CENTER$7,500
ARRUPE JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL$7,500
CROSSPURPOSE$7,500
COLORADO ASSN BLACK PROF ENG SCIENTISTS$7,500
TRI-LAKES CARES$5,000
CAREERS IN CONSTRUCTION COLORADO$5,000
YOU BE YOU EARLY LEARNING$5,000
AURORA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%A PRECIOUS CHILD INC: $8k → 5%CHILDRENS SPEECH AND READING CENTER: $5k → 11%A PRECIOUS CHILD INC: $3k → 5%DIAKONIA: $10k → 9%DIAKONIA: $5k → 9%TRI-LAKES CARES: $5k → 9%ATTENTION HOMES: $5k → 12%WEECYCLE: $5k → 8%TRI LAKES CARES: $5k → 9%Attention Inc: $4k → 12%LABORATORY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING: $10k → 12%LABORATORY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING: $10k → 12%WEECYCLE: $5k → 8%LABORATORY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING: $5k → 12%LABORATORY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING: $5k → 12%CLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER: $5k → 12%CLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER: $5k → 12%SUN VALLEY YOUTH CENTER INC: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$428k · 26 repeat orgs$176k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
20

Total granted

$428k
$116k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+12%

Still filing today

88%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Craig Hospital Foundation
    5× · 2020–2024 · $30k · revenue +148%
  • LT
    LABORATORY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING
    4× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +45%
  • BG
    Boys & Girls Clubs of Pueblo County
    3× · 2022–2025 · $25k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • CC
    COMMUNITY COALITION FOR FAMILIES
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • RC
    RESOURCE CONNECT
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • TI
    THE INTREPID FALLEN HEROES FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Rise School of Denver

The purpose of the Rise School of Denver is to provide the highest quality inclusive early childhood education and therapy for children with and without developmental disabilities. We do this by providing exemplary school- and clinic-based…

Education
2
Colorado Dream Foundation

We partner with youth and their families as they successfully navigate school, college, and career by providing a holistic academic, social, and emotional program from elementary school through college, along with post-secondary…

—
3
Denver Kids Inc

Provides professional, educational counseling and volunteer mentors for denver public school students, grades third through twelve, with the goal of keeping them in the school system until they graduate from high school.

Education
4
A Shared Vision Partners in Pediatric Blindness and Visual Imp

A Shared Vision educates, inspires, and empowers families to nurture the development of their young children who are blind or visually impaired. We provide early intervention vision services in families' homes and community settings…

Health
5
Urban Peak Denver

Urban peak helps youth experiencing homelessness and youth at risk of becoming homeless overcome real life challenges by providing essential services and a supportive community, empowering them to become self-sufficient adults.

Housing & Shelter
6
Invest in Kids

Invest in kids partners with local communities to ensure the success of evidence-based programs that improve the health and well-being of colorado's youngest children and their families.

Youth Development
7
Denver Area Youth Services

To promote and provide a continuum of human services to youth and their families.

Human Services
8
Activate Work Inc

We provide training, coaching, community supports and access to leading colorado employers enabling coloradans to acheive economic security, mobility and prosperity.

Human Services
9
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
10
Denver Police Activities League Inc

The denver police activities league's (pal) mission is to create strong communities by providing under-resourced children with opportunities, exposure, and experiences with the intent of changing young people's lives in a positive way.

Youth Development
11
Delta Gamma Anchor Center for Blind Children

Part i and part iii, line 1: anchor center for blind children is a nationally recognized leader in teaching children with vision, cortical visual, dual sensory (vision and hearing), and co-occurring disabilities during their most formative…

—
12
Parent Possible

We envision a colorado where every family is a thriving ecosystem of learning, laughing, and well-being. our mission is to equip parents with the tools and information to be their child's most valuable teacher, trainer, and mentor in life.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Children's Home; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/46
Grantees still filing
29/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Boys & Girls Clubs of Pueblo County: $25,000 · OtherBoys & Girls Clubs of Pueblo CountyARRUPE JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $20,000 · OtherARRUPE JESUIT HIGH SCHOOLGIGIS PLAYHOUSE INC: $15,000 · OtherGIGIS PLAYHOUSE INCYou Be You Early Learning: $15,000 · OtherYou Be You Early LearningMOTHER HOUSE DBA HAVEN RIDGE: $15,000 · OtherMOTHER HOUSE DBA HAVEN RIDGEREAD TO ME: $12,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY COALITION FOR FAMILIES: $10,000 · OtherRESOURCE CONNECT: $10,000 · OtherCOLORADO ASSN BLACK PROF ENG SCIENTISTS: $7,500 · OtherTHE INTREPID FALLEN HEROES FUND: $10,000 · OtherMARIA DROSTE SERVICES OF COLORADO INC: $11,000 · OtherCROSSPURPOSE: $7,500 · OtherCASA of the Pikes Peak Region: $8,000 · Other+12 more: $59,000 · Other+12 moreLABORATORY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING: $30,000 · Human ServicesLABORATORY TO COMBAT HU…CLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesCLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENV…Diakonia: $15,000 · Human ServicesDiakoniaA PRECIOUS CHILD INC: $10,500 · Human ServicesA PRECIOUS CHILD INCWEECYCLE: $10,000 · Human ServicesWEECYCLESUN VALLEY YOUTH CENTER INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesSUN VALLEY YOUTH CENTER…TRI-LAKES CARES: $10,000 · Human ServicesTRI-LAKES CARESATTENTION INC: $9,000 · Human ServicesATTENTION INCREZILIENTKIDZ: $5,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S SPEECH & READING CENTER: $5,000 · Human ServicesCraig Hospital Foundation: $30,000 · HealthCraig Hospital Fou…COLORADO CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $16,000 · HealthCOLORADO CENTER FO…THE MORGAN ADAMS FOUNDATION: $15,000 · HealthTHE MORGAN ADAMS F…NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $15,000 · HealthNATIONAL JEWISH HE…American Diabetes Association: $10,000 · HealthAmerican Diabetes …DENVER CHILDREN'S HOME: $10,000 · HealthDENVER CHILDREN'S …ANCHOR INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 · HealthALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $23,400 · EducationALLIANCE FO…TINY TIM CENTER INC DBA TLC LEARNING CENTER: $11,000 · EducationTINY TIM CE…Montessori del Mundo Charter School: $5,000 · EducationMontessori …READING PARTNERS: $5,000 · EducationREADING PAR…PEDALING MINDS INC: $5,000 · EducationPEDALING MI…HIGHLINE ACADEMY: $5,000 · EducationHIGHLINE AC…SEXUAL ASSAULT VICTIM ADVOCATE CENTER: $5,000 · EducationSEXUAL ASSA…HEART AND HAND CENTER: $42,500 · Crime & LegalMINDS MATTER COLORADO INC: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentGROWE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF COLORADO INC: $7,000 · Youth DevelopmentJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-ROCKY MOUNTAIN INC: $10,000 · InternationalTHE EXODUS ROAD INC: $10,000 · International
Other$225,000Human Services$124,500Health$101,000Education$59,400Crime & Legal$42,500Youth Development$37,000International$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEART AND HAND CENTER: $42,500 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetCraig Hospital Foundation: $30,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLABORATORY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING: $30,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Pueblo County: $25,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $23,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMINDS MATTER COLORADO INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCOLORADO CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $16,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetDiakonia: $15,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetYou Be You Early Learning: $15,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetMOTHER HOUSE DBA HAVEN RIDGE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MORGAN ADAMS FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARIA DROSTE SERVICES OF COLORADO INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTINY TIM CENTER INC DBA TLC LEARNING CENTER: $11,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetA PRECIOUS CHILD INC: $10,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWEECYCLE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGROWE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-ROCKY MOUNTAIN INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE EXODUS ROAD INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDENVER CHILDREN'S HOME: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE INTREPID FALLEN HEROES FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRI-LAKES CARES: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetATTENTION INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCASA of the Pikes Peak Region: $8,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetREVEL: $7,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF COLORADO INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOMEWARD BOUND OF THE GRAND VALLEY: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMontessori del Mundo Charter School: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOCKWOOD FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetREADING PARTNERS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREZILIENTKIDZ: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHUNGER FREE COLORADO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEDALING MINDS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetCASA OF THE NINTH: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetAurora Public Schools Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOLORADO FRIENDSHIP INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetANCHOR INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetHIGHLINE ACADEMY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEXUAL ASSAULT VICTIM ADVOCATE CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives Founda…The Denver FoundationThe Colorado Health F…El Pomar FoundationAnschutz Family Found…Mile High United Way …McInnes S and J Char …Rose Community Founda…Xcel Energy FoundationThe Denver Children's…The Anschutz Foundati…Hill Foundation Wells…
Colorado Gives FoundationCO63× affinity35 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · McInnes S and J Char Tr · Rose Community Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Denver Children's Foundation · The Anschutz Foundation · Hill Foundation Wells Fargo Bank Na

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Madigan Edward Fdn Tuw funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Madigan Edward Fdn Tuw. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    25report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Madigan Edward Fdn Tuw’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home