· Private foundation
Zichron Chaim Charity Fund
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k235 grants · $112k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AGUDATH ISRAEL BAIS BINYOMIN | $10,135 |
| TALMUDICAL YESHIVA OF PHILADELPHIA | $10,000 |
| KHAL BNEI AVROHOM YAAKOV INC | $7,840 |
| KEREN HASHVIIS | $5,000 |
| YESHIVA IMRE YOSEF | $4,000 |
| SINAI ACADAMY | $3,700 |
| DERECH HATORAH KIRYAT SEFER | $3,600 |
| CONG TORAH CENTER OF CHESTNUT RIDGE | $3,600 |
| KOLLEL INTERNATIONAL INC | $3,100 |
| BNOS BAIS YAAKOVTICHON MEIR MOSHE | $3,000 |
| ROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY | $2,680 |
| INSTITUTE FOR DAYANIM | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| ZICHRON TZVI ELIMELECH | $1,980 |
| PTACH | $1,810 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +6% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
277 repeat relationships — 138 still active in FY2024, 139 since wound down; 97 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MRMosdos Rabbainu Nachum Meshadyk5× · 2020–2024 · $107k · revenue +61%
- RCROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC4× · 2021–2024 · $11k · revenue +6%
- IFINSTITUTE FOR DAYANIM4× · 2021–2024 · $10k · revenue +61%
Funded once
- AHADERES HATORAH SUMMER EXPERIENCone grant, 2022 · $10k
- GYGOAN YAACOVone grant, 2021 · $10k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Religious Teaching
Religious School
Support of religious schools in Israel
encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lev Lalev Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Project Raanana. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
205 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 205 of the 623 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Mosdos Rabbainu Nachum Meshadyk ↗
- Who funds CONGREGATION BNOS YAKOV ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INC ↗
- Who funds ROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR DAYANIM ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC ↗
- Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗
- Who funds IMREI YOSEF ↗
- Who funds AGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds KEREN HASHVIIS INC ↗
- Who funds Womens Institute of Torah Seminary for Girls ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA NESIVOS HATORAH INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVATH MEOR HATALMUD ↗
- Who funds CONG CHASDEI YISROEL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · The Ojc Fund · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · Moses and Miriam Vogel Charitable Foundation Tr · The Jmg Foundation · The Sorala Foundation · Regina Goldwasser Foundation · The R & S Family Foundation Inc · The Basch Family Foundation · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Zichron Chaim Charity Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Talmud Torah Yesodei Hatorah Inc — 17% of income from government
- Yeshiva Nachlei Torah Inc — 9% of income from government
- Yeshiva Nesivos Hatorah Inc — 3% of income from government
- Yeshiva Tiferes Torah Inc — 3% of income from government
- Oorah Inc — 0% of income from government
- Torah Academy of Boca Raton Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.