· Private foundation
The Yad Charity Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 167 grants below total $690,840 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $868,866 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $178,026 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k157 grants · $98k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $46k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $546k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Donors' Fund Inc. | $230,000 |
| Yeshiva Minchas Eluzor | $63,000 |
| Hebron Fund Inc. | $53,425 |
| Brooklyn Talmudical Academy | $50,000 |
| Rambam Research Academy | $50,000 |
| American Theological Institute | $50,000 |
| Central Charity Institute | $50,000 |
| Chabad At Midtown, Inc. | $20,000 |
| Friends Of Toldos Tzvi | $15,000 |
| Paypal-give Fund Chabad Of Miami Gardens | $11,000 |
| Cong. Yeshiva Bais Yitzchok | $9,750 |
| Am. Friends Of Yeshiva Gedolah Matisyahu | $6,800 |
| Upy Yad Elkana-kiryat Arba | $6,375 |
| RCCS- Rofeh Cholim Cancer Society | $5,682 |
| Ezrat Israel Inc. | $5,200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
118 repeat relationships — 93 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 69 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $96k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HFHEBRON FUND INC4× · 2019–2025 · $187k · revenue +93%
- TSTOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC4× · 2019–2025 · $10k · revenue +127%
- MEMY EXTENDED FAMILY INC3× · 2019–2025 · $9k · revenue +227%
Funded once
- CJCong Jewish Education Program JEPone grant, 2019 · $40k
- AFAm. Friends Of Yeshiva Gedolah Malisyahuone grant, 2022 · $34k
- BYBAIS YAAKOV ACADEMY FOR GIRLSone grant, 2019 · $26k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To further jewish education in israel
To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs
The organization will provide financial assistance to educational institutions that promote the observance of the jewish religion, its laws and traditions, and sacred texts, including yeshivat nachalat yossef, located in jerusalem, israel.
Support of religious schools in Israel
To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.
To support and promote the study of torah (bible) among members of jewish faith worldwide.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mesorah Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Camp Extreme D/B/a Project Extreme. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 367 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Eisenberg Family Foundation Inc · The Albert and Yetta Lupin Memorial Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Weiskopf Family Foundation · Cross River Community Foundation · The Jmg Foundation · Dinim Foundation · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Gertrude and Morris Bienenfeld Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.