Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lowe - Skilling Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$14k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Arts & Culture$43kCrime & Legal$25kAnimals$18kEducation$10kCommunity Improvement$10kEnvironment$3kHuman Services$1kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$580k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEXAS PERFORMING ARTS$5,000
FRIENDS OF AUSTIN ANIMAL CENTER$2,500
HIGHLAND COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$2,500
THE LITERACY & LEARNING CENTER$1,000
THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC$1,000
THE BASCOM CORPORATION$1,000
HIGHLAND PERFORMING ARTS CENTER$1,000
TEXAS DPS TROOPERS FOUNDATION$50
MARINE CORPS ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION$42
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $700) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $500 → 10%TEXAS DPS TROOPERS FOUNDATION: $50 → 10%TEXAS DPS TROOPERS FOUNDATION: $50 → 10%TEXAS DPS TROOPERS FOUNDATION: $50 → 10%TEXAS DPS TROOPERS FOUNDATION: $50 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

OH
CT
CA
NE
VA
NC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$67k · 11 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +15% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
16

Total granted

$67k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+11%

Still filing today

82%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureAnimalsRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    TEXAS HERITAGE SONGWRITERS ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $25k · revenue +104%
  • THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $6k · revenue +44%
  • TB
    The Bascom Corporation
    4× · 2021–2024 · $6k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • PE
    PRISON ENTERPRENEUR FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • TL
    Three Lakes Community Improvement Assoc DBA Pinecrest Community Improvement Assc
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +0%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Medical Association

The texas medical association (tma), the nation's largest and one of the oldest state medical societies, represents over 59,000 physicians and medical students dedicated to enhancing the health of all texans. in collaboration with 110…

2
The Humane Society of Austin & Travis County Inc

The austin humane society (ahs) offers comprehensive, humane, life-saving animal services, transforming the lives of animals and those who love them. because we believe homeless animals deserve a chance to thrive in a loving environment,…

Animals
3
The University of Texas Foundation No 1

To support the university of texas system

4
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education
5
Cca Texas Fund

To support coastal conservation association in carrying out the charitable and educational purpose for which it was organized and is operated, namely, promoting and advancing the preservation, conservation and protection of marine, plant…

Environment
6
The University of Texas Foundation No 2

To support the university of texas system

7
Texas Pharmacy Association

The association's purpose is to promote the role of the pharmacist and the practice of pharmacy in the state of texas.

8
Spca of Texas

The spca of texas is dedicated to providing every animal exceptional care and a loving home.

Animals
9
Texas Hospital Association

The texas hospital association's mission is to provide leadership in advocacy, information and education to enable texas hospitals to deliver superior, cost effective care which enhances the health care of individuals and their communities.

Health
10
Texas Alliance for Patient Access

Preserve access to quality healthcare for all texans

Community Improvement
11
Texas Children's Hospital Foundation

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and research.

Health
12
The Texas Golf Association

To promote the playing and advancement of the royal and ancient game of golf in texas.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The University of Texas Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Three Lakes Community Improvement Assoc Dba Pinecrest Community Improvement Assc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PRISON ENTERPRENEUR FUND — $25,000 · OtherPRISON ENTERPRENEUR FUNDTEXAS PERFORMING ARTS — $11,000 · OtherTEXAS PERFORMING ARTSHIGHLANDS LAKES CANINE RESCUE — $9,000 · OtherHIGHLANDS LAKES CANINE RESCUETHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INCIndividual grant recipient — $3,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFRIENDS OF CENTRAL TEXAS WATER COALITION — $3,000 · Other+13 more — $4,550 · Other+13 moreTEXAS HERITAGE SONGWRITERS ASSOCIATION — $25,000 · Arts & CultureTEXAS HERITAGE SONGWRITERS AS…The Bascom Corporation — $5,500 · Arts & CultureThe Bascom Corporation+1 more — $442 · Arts & CultureThree Lakes Community Improvement Assoc DBA Pinecrest Community Improvement Assc — $10,150 · Community ImprovementThree Lak…FRIENDS OF AUSTIN ANIMAL CENTER — $5,000 · AnimalsHIGHLAND COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $2,500 · AnimalsAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC — $1,000 · AnimalsLiteracy Council of Highlands Inc — $2,420 · EducationRabun Gap-Nacoochee School — $2,000 · EducationTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC — $1,000 · PhilanthropyCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $800 · Food & Nutrition
Other$62,050Arts & Culture$30,942Community Improvement$10,150Animals$8,500Education$4,420Philanthropy$1,000Food & Nutrition$800

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTEXAS HERITAGE SONGWRITERS ASSOCIATION — $25,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetThree Lakes Community Improvement Assoc DBA Pinecrest Community Improvement Assc — $10,150 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Bascom Corporation — $5,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF AUSTIN ANIMAL CENTER — $5,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetHIGHLAND COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLiteracy Council of Highlands Inc — $2,420 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetRabun Gap-Nacoochee School — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE AUSTIN — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE CORPS ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION — $442 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPHOENIX CENTER — $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR CHILD PROTECTION — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Junior Golf Association Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALS ASSOCIATION-TEXAS CHAPTER — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS DPS TROOPERS FOUNDATION INC — $200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lowe - Skilling Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph