Skip to content

· Private foundation

Louise P Hackett Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$104k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$248kInternational$105kHousing & Shelter$102kArts & Culture$73kEnvironment$60kFood & Nutrition$55kYouth Development$35kEducation$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $74k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$713k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Doctors Without Borders USA Inc$15,000
Pancreatic Cancer Action Network Inc$15,000
Planned Parenthood Federation of$6,000
Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS$5,000
St Jude Children's Research Hospital$5,000
Trinity Center Walnut Creek$5,000
SHELTER Inc of Contra Costa County$5,000
Environmental Defense Fund EDF$5,000
Big Brothers Big Sisters of America$5,000
National Endowment for the Arts (NEA)$5,000
Habitat for Humanity International$5,000
FOOD BANK CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO$5,000
OCEAN CONSERVANCY INC$5,000
MEALS ON WHEELS OF CONTRA COSTA INC$5,000
National Public Radio Inc$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Trinity Center Walnut Creek: $5k → 9%Trinity Center Walnut Creek: $5k → 9%Trinity Center Walnut Creek: $5k → 9%Trinity Center Walnut Creek: $5k → 9%Trinity Center Walnut Creek: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
CA
CO
KY
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$710k · 22 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against -24% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
2

Total granted

$710k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
-24%

Still filing today

59%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHousing & ShelterEnvironmentFood & NutritionInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $105k · revenue +89%
  • NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $35k · revenue +41%
  • BB
    Big Brothers Big Sisters Of America
    7× · 2018–2024 · $35k · revenue +158%

Funded once

  • CV
    CHARITABLE VENTURES OF ORANGE COUNTY
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -24%
  • HO
    Hospice of the Carolina Foothills Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
2
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
3
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
4
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
5
Extrafood

Food Rescue - The Organization rescues excess fresh food from Bay Area businesses, schools and non-profits and immediately delivers the food to safety net partners - such as senior housing centers, after-school programs, and homeless…

Food & Nutrition
6
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
7
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
8
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
9
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
10
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
11
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
12
Public Health Institute

Public health institute generates and promotes research, leadership and partnerships to build capacity for strong public health policy, programs, systems and practices.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shelter Inc; the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels Contra Costa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Pancreatic Cancer Action Network Inc: $105,000 · OtherPancreatic Cancer Action Network IncPlanned Parenthood Federation of: $37,000 · OtherPlanned Parenthood Federation ofBig Brothers Big Sisters Of America: $35,000 · OtherBig Brothers Big Sisters Of AmericaNational Endowment for the Arts (NEA): $35,000 · OtherNational Endowment for the Arts (NEA)Habitat for Humanity International: $35,000 · OtherHabitat for Humanity InternationalHospice Foundation of the East Bay: $17,500 · OtherPlanned Parenthood Walnut Creek: $16,000 · OtherMT Diablo Alternative Education Fund: $15,000 · OtherTRINITY CENTER WALNUT CREEK: $25,000 · OtherTRINITY CENTER WALNUT CREEKSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $14,000 · Other+4 more: $15,500 · OtherMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $105,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FR…ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION: $35,000 · HealthELIZABETH G…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $35,000 · HealthST JUDE CHI…OCEAN CONSERVANCY: $35,000 · EnvironmentOCEAN CON…ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $25,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONME…MEALS ON WHEELS CONTRA COSTA INC: $30,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $25,000 · Food & NutritionSHELTER INC: $35,000 · Housing & ShelterMISSION ACTION INC: $7,000 · Housing & ShelterNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $35,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$350,000International$105,000Health$70,000Environment$60,000Food & Nutrition$55,000Housing & Shelter$42,000Arts & Culture$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $105,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters Of America: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTER INC: $35,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS CONTRA COSTA INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY CENTER WALNUT CREEK: $25,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $14,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION ACTION INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITABLE VENTURES OF ORANGE COUNTY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPS OF HOPE: $5,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetThe Pacifica Foundation: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC ↗
  • Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters Of America ↗
  • Who funds ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS CONTRA COSTA INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY CENTER WALNUT CREEK ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSION ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARITABLE VENTURES OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds STEPS OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds The Pacifica Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community FoundationCA15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Louise P Hackett Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Louise P Hackett Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Big Brothers Big Sisters of America: 21% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $106k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Louise P Hackett’s filings →

More from the funding graph